1028 Systematic Review of Outcomes of Applications of Prineo-Dermabond

Abstract Aim The aims of this study are to assess published data regarding infection rates, delayed wound healing, cosmetic appearance and application time compared to conventional wound closure techniques across multiple surgical procedures. Method A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guideline using PubMed, SCOPUS and Science Direct. The primary outcome was the incidence of wound infection after Prineo Dermabond compared to controls. Secondary outcome measures included allergic reactions and time for application. Literature search identified 52 studies, of which 19 were eligible for qualitative synthesis and 12 for meta-analysis. Results Studies included reflected a broad range of applications of Dermeo-Prineo to wound closure in Abdominoplasty, Mammoplasty and Arthroplasty. Overall, all studies reporting on time of application found a positive indicator of Prineo Dermabond reducing time for wound closure. Meta-analysis identified a statistically significant reduction in rates of the 6 studies that described wound infection (Prineo 1.51%, Control N=2.13%, OR 0.65 (0.46–0.91); P=0.01) and in the 5 studies reporting delayed wound healing (Prineo 0.99%, Control N=1.79%, OR 0.42 (0.18–0.98); P=0.05) in the use of Prineo Dermabond versus controls. Three studies reported outcomes of scar cosmesis or long-term maturation. All attested to better cosmetic results in comparison to sutures. Two studies discussed cost-effectiveness of Dermabond with a hypothetical model concluded that Skin Closure System of Prineo Dermabond could achieve savings of $50–76 per patient, whilst a retrospective model found no statistically significant difference in Total Hospital costs or Operating room time. Conclusions Prineo Dermabond provides an alternative method of wound closure in reported studies.