Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges

View through CrossRef
13 Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2017)Do judges make decisions that are truly impartial? A wide range of experimental and field studies reveal that several extra-legal factors influence judicial decision making. Demographic characteristics of judges and litigants affect judges’ decisions. Judges also rely heavily on intuitive reasoning in deciding cases, making them vulnerable to the use of mental shortcuts that can lead to mistakes. Furthermore, judges sometimes rely on facts outside the record and rule more favorably towards litigants who are more sympathetic or with whom they share demographic characteristics. On the whole, judges are excellent decision makers, and sometimes resist common errors of judgment that influence ordinary adults. The weight of the evidence, however, suggests that judges are vulnerable to systematic deviations from the ideal of judicial impartiality.
Title: Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges
Description:
13 Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2017)Do judges make decisions that are truly impartial? A wide range of experimental and field studies reveal that several extra-legal factors influence judicial decision making.
Demographic characteristics of judges and litigants affect judges’ decisions.
Judges also rely heavily on intuitive reasoning in deciding cases, making them vulnerable to the use of mental shortcuts that can lead to mistakes.
Furthermore, judges sometimes rely on facts outside the record and rule more favorably towards litigants who are more sympathetic or with whom they share demographic characteristics.
On the whole, judges are excellent decision makers, and sometimes resist common errors of judgment that influence ordinary adults.
The weight of the evidence, however, suggests that judges are vulnerable to systematic deviations from the ideal of judicial impartiality.

Related Results

The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
National Judicial Commission In India: The New Challenge
National Judicial Commission In India: The New Challenge
Art. 50 of our constitution provide - separation of powers and independent judiciary (under directive principles) and Art. 13 of the Indian constitution provide vital power to amen...
Judgecraft
Judgecraft
Abstract Judgecraft refers to the combination of practical skills associated with good judging. It varies with the type of court. In an apex court the focus is on...
Absolute and Relative Competence in Religious Jurisdiction in Indonesia
Absolute and Relative Competence in Religious Jurisdiction in Indonesia
The religious judiciary has undergone significant changes following independence. The emergence of regulations has greatly promoted progress in the field of religious judiciary in ...
Media Relations in the PR Structure of the Judiciary
Media Relations in the PR Structure of the Judiciary
The article analyzes the liaison between judges and journalists as part of the information policy of the judiciary. It is shown herein that the restriction of access to judicial in...
Professional Ethics for Judges – Lessons Learned from the Past. Dialogue as Didactics to Develop Moral Leadership for Judges
Professional Ethics for Judges – Lessons Learned from the Past. Dialogue as Didactics to Develop Moral Leadership for Judges
Professional Ethics for Judges – Lessons Learned from the Past. Dialogue as Didactics to Develop Moral Leadership for Judges Special Issue on Education in (Professional) Legal Ethi...
Towering Judges
Towering Judges
In Towering Judges: A Comparative Study of Constitutional Judges, Rehan Abeyratne and Iddo Porat lead an exploration of a new topic in comparative constitutional law: towering judg...
HIGHER JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: TUSSLE BETWEEN JUDICIARY AND EXECUTIVE
HIGHER JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: TUSSLE BETWEEN JUDICIARY AND EXECUTIVE
Executive, legislature and judiciary, the three organs of the government, need to be independent and accountable to each other as propounded by Montesqui’s Separation of Power doct...

Back to Top