Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges

View through CrossRef
13 Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2017)Do judges make decisions that are truly impartial? A wide range of experimental and field studies reveal that several extra-legal factors influence judicial decision making. Demographic characteristics of judges and litigants affect judges’ decisions. Judges also rely heavily on intuitive reasoning in deciding cases, making them vulnerable to the use of mental shortcuts that can lead to mistakes. Furthermore, judges sometimes rely on facts outside the record and rule more favorably towards litigants who are more sympathetic or with whom they share demographic characteristics. On the whole, judges are excellent decision makers, and sometimes resist common errors of judgment that influence ordinary adults. The weight of the evidence, however, suggests that judges are vulnerable to systematic deviations from the ideal of judicial impartiality.
Title: Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges
Description:
13 Annual Review of Law and Social Science (2017)Do judges make decisions that are truly impartial? A wide range of experimental and field studies reveal that several extra-legal factors influence judicial decision making.
Demographic characteristics of judges and litigants affect judges’ decisions.
Judges also rely heavily on intuitive reasoning in deciding cases, making them vulnerable to the use of mental shortcuts that can lead to mistakes.
Furthermore, judges sometimes rely on facts outside the record and rule more favorably towards litigants who are more sympathetic or with whom they share demographic characteristics.
On the whole, judges are excellent decision makers, and sometimes resist common errors of judgment that influence ordinary adults.
The weight of the evidence, however, suggests that judges are vulnerable to systematic deviations from the ideal of judicial impartiality.

Related Results

Absolute and Relative Competence in Religious Jurisdiction in Indonesia
Absolute and Relative Competence in Religious Jurisdiction in Indonesia
The religious judiciary has undergone significant changes following independence. The emergence of regulations has greatly promoted progress in the field of religious judiciary in ...
Media Relations in the PR Structure of the Judiciary
Media Relations in the PR Structure of the Judiciary
The article analyzes the liaison between judges and journalists as part of the information policy of the judiciary. It is shown herein that the restriction of access to judicial in...
Professional Ethics for Judges – Lessons Learned from the Past. Dialogue as Didactics to Develop Moral Leadership for Judges
Professional Ethics for Judges – Lessons Learned from the Past. Dialogue as Didactics to Develop Moral Leadership for Judges
Professional Ethics for Judges – Lessons Learned from the Past. Dialogue as Didactics to Develop Moral Leadership for Judges Special Issue on Education in (Professional) Legal Ethi...
Judges’ characteristics and sentencing in Hong Kong
Judges’ characteristics and sentencing in Hong Kong
The influence of judges’ characteristics on sentencing remains an understudied area particularly in Asian contexts. Previous studies typically focus on the effects of judges’ demog...
URGENSITAS PENGUATAN ETIKA PROFESI HAKIM
URGENSITAS PENGUATAN ETIKA PROFESI HAKIM
The judge as the main element in the court places his profession as a representative of God, because the judge's job is to determine law and justice in society, so the responsibili...
Are Arbitrators Human?
Are Arbitrators Human?
Empirical research has confirmed the correctness of the legal realists’ assertion that “judges are human.” It demonstrates that judicial decisions are sometimes tainted by bias, id...
Role of Indian Judiciary in Ensuring Good Governance: A Comparative Analysis of South Asian Countries
Role of Indian Judiciary in Ensuring Good Governance: A Comparative Analysis of South Asian Countries
Good governance is a primary principal for the rule of law in any democratic society. Good governance constitutes fairness, accountability and transparency in the functioning of th...

Back to Top