Javascript must be enabled to continue!
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MICROSURGICAL VERICOCELECTOMY IN TERMS OF SPERM COUNT
View through CrossRef
Background: Infertility affects nearly 15% of couples of reproductive age, with male factors contributing to 40–50% of cases. Varicocele, an abnormal dilation of the pampiniform plexus veins, is one of the most common reversible causes of male infertility, observed in approximately 16–21% of men presenting to infertility clinics. It impairs spermatogenesis through testicular hyperthermia and venous congestion, leading to poor semen quality. Surgical correction through varicocelectomy remains the mainstay of treatment, with microscopic and laparoscopic techniques being the most widely practiced.
Objective: To compare the improvement in sperm count following laparoscopic and microscopic sub-inguinal varicocelectomy in infertile males diagnosed with varicocele.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from January 1, 2025, to June 30, 2025. A total of 80 males aged 18–40 years with Doppler-confirmed unilateral varicocele were enrolled and randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A (n=40) underwent microscopic sub-inguinal varicocelectomy, while Group B (n=40) underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Semen analyses were performed preoperatively and at four months postoperatively. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22, applying paired t-tests for within-group and independent t-tests for between-group comparisons, with a p-value <0.05 considered significant.
Results: The mean preoperative sperm count in the microscopic group was 13.68 ± 4.77 million/mL, increasing to 23.86 ± 6.14 million/mL postoperatively (t = −20.03, p < 0.001). In the laparoscopic group, counts rose from 15.25 ± 3.79 million/mL to 21.55 ± 4.42 million/mL (t = −13.84, p < 0.001). The between-group comparison showed a near-significant difference (t = 1.91, p = 0.061), suggesting a trend favoring the microscopic approach.
Conclusion: Both microscopic and laparoscopic varicocelectomy significantly improved sperm counts, confirming varicocelectomy as an effective surgical treatment for varicocele-related male infertility. The microscopic technique showed a slight advantage in enhancing spermatogenesis, though larger multicenter trials are needed to validate this difference.
Health and Research Insights
Title: COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS MICROSURGICAL VERICOCELECTOMY IN TERMS OF SPERM COUNT
Description:
Background: Infertility affects nearly 15% of couples of reproductive age, with male factors contributing to 40–50% of cases.
Varicocele, an abnormal dilation of the pampiniform plexus veins, is one of the most common reversible causes of male infertility, observed in approximately 16–21% of men presenting to infertility clinics.
It impairs spermatogenesis through testicular hyperthermia and venous congestion, leading to poor semen quality.
Surgical correction through varicocelectomy remains the mainstay of treatment, with microscopic and laparoscopic techniques being the most widely practiced.
Objective: To compare the improvement in sperm count following laparoscopic and microscopic sub-inguinal varicocelectomy in infertile males diagnosed with varicocele.
Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from January 1, 2025, to June 30, 2025.
A total of 80 males aged 18–40 years with Doppler-confirmed unilateral varicocele were enrolled and randomly divided into two equal groups.
Group A (n=40) underwent microscopic sub-inguinal varicocelectomy, while Group B (n=40) underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy.
Semen analyses were performed preoperatively and at four months postoperatively.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22, applying paired t-tests for within-group and independent t-tests for between-group comparisons, with a p-value <0.
05 considered significant.
Results: The mean preoperative sperm count in the microscopic group was 13.
68 ± 4.
77 million/mL, increasing to 23.
86 ± 6.
14 million/mL postoperatively (t = −20.
03, p < 0.
001).
In the laparoscopic group, counts rose from 15.
25 ± 3.
79 million/mL to 21.
55 ± 4.
42 million/mL (t = −13.
84, p < 0.
001).
The between-group comparison showed a near-significant difference (t = 1.
91, p = 0.
061), suggesting a trend favoring the microscopic approach.
Conclusion: Both microscopic and laparoscopic varicocelectomy significantly improved sperm counts, confirming varicocelectomy as an effective surgical treatment for varicocele-related male infertility.
The microscopic technique showed a slight advantage in enhancing spermatogenesis, though larger multicenter trials are needed to validate this difference.
Related Results
P-046 Effect of different sperm chromatin dispersion type on IVF/ICSI outcome and offspring profile
P-046 Effect of different sperm chromatin dispersion type on IVF/ICSI outcome and offspring profile
Abstract
Study question
Whether the percentage of different sperm chromatin dispersion type are associated with the IVF/ICSI out...
P–025 Sperm selection using a modified “swim up” technique in absence of sperm centrifugation improve sperm DNA fragmentation and decreases miscarriage rate
P–025 Sperm selection using a modified “swim up” technique in absence of sperm centrifugation improve sperm DNA fragmentation and decreases miscarriage rate
Abstract
Study question
Is it useful to avoid sperm centrifugation in laboratory routine work to improve sperm quality and repro...
Optimization of the TLR7/8 Activation-Based Sorting System for Goat Sperm
Optimization of the TLR7/8 Activation-Based Sorting System for Goat Sperm
Background:Current research indicates that the immunological separation method based on differentially expressed proteins in X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm represents a novel ap...
P–069 microfluidic sperm sorting vs density gradient to yield sperm with reduced DFI for patients undergoing IVF-ICSI
P–069 microfluidic sperm sorting vs density gradient to yield sperm with reduced DFI for patients undergoing IVF-ICSI
Abstract
Study question
To compare the effect of sperm preparation methods on the DFI of semen sample for patients undergoing IC...
P–101 Comparative assessment of laparoscopic, microsurgical varicocelectomy, and antioxidant therapy alone in Infertile men with pathozoospermia
P–101 Comparative assessment of laparoscopic, microsurgical varicocelectomy, and antioxidant therapy alone in Infertile men with pathozoospermia
Abstract
Study question
Which treatment option is better in men with clinical varicocele and pathozoospermia: laparoscopic, micr...
P-072 Fresh testicular sperm seems to yield more fertilization abnormalities and early pregnancy loss than frozen testicular sperm
P-072 Fresh testicular sperm seems to yield more fertilization abnormalities and early pregnancy loss than frozen testicular sperm
Abstract
Study question
How do ICSI outcomes using fresh testicular sperm, compare to those using frozen samples cryopreserved f...
P–103 Novel sperm preparation techniques compared with conventional preparation method
P–103 Novel sperm preparation techniques compared with conventional preparation method
Abstract
Study question
Which sperm preparation technique separate the best quality sperm?
...
Sperm Quality Assessment of White Shrimp (Litopenaeus Vannamei) Broodstock using Comet Assay
Sperm Quality Assessment of White Shrimp (Litopenaeus Vannamei) Broodstock using Comet Assay
The quality of sperms is considered one of the factors determining fertilization success of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Generally, conventional methods such as sperm count ...

