Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Bridging Science to Science Policy - Why it Matters with Geologic Energy Research
View through CrossRef
Advising policy makers of ongoing geologic energy research is a key
facet of enabling long-term energy security. If policy makers and their
staffs do not hear from practicing scientists, they will likely rely on
public opinion instead of making scientifically-informed choices about
our energy future. As much of what the public hears related to geologic
energy research has negative connotations (e.g., environmental harm,
induced seismicity), this can lead to public pressure on policy makers
to discourage all geologic energy research. Providing information to
stakeholders to make informed decisions will help ground policy
decisions in facts. Traditional geologic energy fuels (e.g., coal, oil,
and natural gas) are still a necessary part of our energy portfolio,
even as other energy sources are being developed. The Energy
Investigations Program (EIP) at the Geological Survey of Alabama
conducts research on all geologic energy resources that would affect the
state and region, including fossil fuel resource assessment. EIP
provides unbiased information about potential development, including
projected costs, environmental impact, and broader economic impact. This
research helps people make informed decisions about how (or even if)
they want to develop these resources. Researchers must be sure that
policy makers are aware of the broader role of geologic energy research
as we move beyond old-school petroleum geology. For example, current
work in EIP focuses on how carbon dioxide produced from burning fossil
fuels might be captured and then either used or stored permanently
(carbon capture, utilization, and storage, CCUS). CCUS includes
permanent geologic sequestration and enhanced hydrocarbon recovery.
Knowledge and support of continued geologic CCUS work is vital to
long-term energy security. To ensure energy security, fossil fuels
cannot be the only geologic energy solution. For example, compressed air
energy storage and low-temperature geothermal energy are vital to
understand as part of the energy revolution beyond fossil fuels. If
decision-makers are unaware of these research efforts, it will be more
difficult to gain support for a more balanced energy portfolio. By
informing the public, legislators, and industry about these varied
geologic energy sources, we enable a stronger energy future and bridge
the interface between geoscience research and public policy.
Title: Bridging Science to Science Policy - Why it Matters with Geologic Energy Research
Description:
Advising policy makers of ongoing geologic energy research is a key
facet of enabling long-term energy security.
If policy makers and their
staffs do not hear from practicing scientists, they will likely rely on
public opinion instead of making scientifically-informed choices about
our energy future.
As much of what the public hears related to geologic
energy research has negative connotations (e.
g.
, environmental harm,
induced seismicity), this can lead to public pressure on policy makers
to discourage all geologic energy research.
Providing information to
stakeholders to make informed decisions will help ground policy
decisions in facts.
Traditional geologic energy fuels (e.
g.
, coal, oil,
and natural gas) are still a necessary part of our energy portfolio,
even as other energy sources are being developed.
The Energy
Investigations Program (EIP) at the Geological Survey of Alabama
conducts research on all geologic energy resources that would affect the
state and region, including fossil fuel resource assessment.
EIP
provides unbiased information about potential development, including
projected costs, environmental impact, and broader economic impact.
This
research helps people make informed decisions about how (or even if)
they want to develop these resources.
Researchers must be sure that
policy makers are aware of the broader role of geologic energy research
as we move beyond old-school petroleum geology.
For example, current
work in EIP focuses on how carbon dioxide produced from burning fossil
fuels might be captured and then either used or stored permanently
(carbon capture, utilization, and storage, CCUS).
CCUS includes
permanent geologic sequestration and enhanced hydrocarbon recovery.
Knowledge and support of continued geologic CCUS work is vital to
long-term energy security.
To ensure energy security, fossil fuels
cannot be the only geologic energy solution.
For example, compressed air
energy storage and low-temperature geothermal energy are vital to
understand as part of the energy revolution beyond fossil fuels.
If
decision-makers are unaware of these research efforts, it will be more
difficult to gain support for a more balanced energy portfolio.
By
informing the public, legislators, and industry about these varied
geologic energy sources, we enable a stronger energy future and bridge
the interface between geoscience research and public policy.
Related Results
Geologic Modeling And Visualization Facilitates The Transition From Exploration To Development
Geologic Modeling And Visualization Facilitates The Transition From Exploration To Development
Abstract
The development of interactive modeling tools and better integration of seismic and geology allow 3D geologic modeling to play a significant, new role in...
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
Piece by piece: Collaborative mosaic-making for inclusive policy development
This report sets out the findings from one of four projects commissioned by Wellcome Policy Lab to pilot creative approaches to policy development. In this project, Scientia Script...
Geology of Big Bend Ranch State Park, Texas
Geology of Big Bend Ranch State Park, Texas
Big Bend Ranch State Park, the largest in the Texas State Parks System, lies in the rugged Big Bend country of West Texas (figs. 1 and 2). The primary attraction of Big Bend countr...
DDE-TS: A semantic service for geologic time
DDE-TS: A semantic service for geologic time
Age is an important property in geologic data. It can tell us when a geologic event happened, how long did the event last. And it is important to know the sequence of events to con...
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Responsibilised Resilience? Reworking Neoliberal Social Policy Texts
Introduction This essay begins with the premise that resilience, broadly defined as positive adaptation despite adversity (Garmezy and Rutter), and resilience building are importa...
On bridging paired-end RNA-seq data
On bridging paired-end RNA-seq data
Abstract
Motivation
The widely-used high-throughput RNA-sequencing technologies (RNA-seq) usually produce ...
Spatial Database of 1: 2500000 Digital Geologic Map of People's Republic of China
Spatial Database of 1: 2500000 Digital Geologic Map of People's Republic of China
The People's Republic of China 1:2500000 digital geologic map space database was completed in 2001, after a two-year project. In addition to the main database, the database is comp...
Geothematic open data in Umbria region
Geothematic open data in Umbria region
Detailed information about geology, hydrogeology and seismic hazard issues for Umbria region are contained in a spatial database available as open data format (shape file or KMZ) a...

