Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Specifying Shrinkage Limited Cement (Type SL)

View through CrossRef
Abstract The Australian Standard AS 3972 specifies the maximum limit of 750 microstrain for the 28-day mortar drying shrinkage of samples prepared with shrinkage limited cement (Type SL). Although the current shrinkage limit is 750 microstrain, AS 3972 recommends a 600 microstrain for the maximum target or average of drying shrinkage of mortar samples. The lower recommended shrinkage level is justified in the Australian Standard by considering the inherent errors of the mortar drying shrinkage test method AS 2350.13, determined in 1997. The lower recommended shrinkage level is to provide a sufficient level of confidence that a single result obtained from different laboratories may not exceed the maximum limit of 750 microstrains. However, the “informative” recommendation of AS 3972 relating to the maximum average 600 microstrain shrinkage is considered a “normative” term by other specifiers in Australia such as road authorities and ATIC-SPEC SP-43. The current study investigated the past ten-years mortar drying shrinkage test results from round-robin proficiency programs of the major Australian laboratories to calculate the current inherent repeatability and reproducibility error of performing AS 2350.13 test. The average ten-year reproducibility error at 95 % confidence level was calculated 18.6 %, and therefore, it is recommended to increase the recommendation for the maximum average drying shrinkage guidance in Australian Standard AS 3972 Section A3.3.5 from 600 to 630 microstrain. Moreover, repeatability of test was calculated to be 6.3 %. This was equal to maximum of 44 microstrains for Type SL cement with maximum drying shrinkage of 750 microstrain. Results were compared with repeatability of other international test methods and some recommendations for improving the repeatability test procedure were provided for any future research in this area.
Title: Specifying Shrinkage Limited Cement (Type SL)
Description:
Abstract The Australian Standard AS 3972 specifies the maximum limit of 750 microstrain for the 28-day mortar drying shrinkage of samples prepared with shrinkage limited cement (Type SL).
Although the current shrinkage limit is 750 microstrain, AS 3972 recommends a 600 microstrain for the maximum target or average of drying shrinkage of mortar samples.
The lower recommended shrinkage level is justified in the Australian Standard by considering the inherent errors of the mortar drying shrinkage test method AS 2350.
13, determined in 1997.
The lower recommended shrinkage level is to provide a sufficient level of confidence that a single result obtained from different laboratories may not exceed the maximum limit of 750 microstrains.
However, the “informative” recommendation of AS 3972 relating to the maximum average 600 microstrain shrinkage is considered a “normative” term by other specifiers in Australia such as road authorities and ATIC-SPEC SP-43.
The current study investigated the past ten-years mortar drying shrinkage test results from round-robin proficiency programs of the major Australian laboratories to calculate the current inherent repeatability and reproducibility error of performing AS 2350.
13 test.
The average ten-year reproducibility error at 95 % confidence level was calculated 18.
6 %, and therefore, it is recommended to increase the recommendation for the maximum average drying shrinkage guidance in Australian Standard AS 3972 Section A3.
3.
5 from 600 to 630 microstrain.
Moreover, repeatability of test was calculated to be 6.
3 %.
This was equal to maximum of 44 microstrains for Type SL cement with maximum drying shrinkage of 750 microstrain.
Results were compared with repeatability of other international test methods and some recommendations for improving the repeatability test procedure were provided for any future research in this area.

Related Results

The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study
The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study
This study compares the strength of the native bone-cement bond and the old-new cement bond under cyclic loading, using third generation cementing technique, rasping and contaminat...
Expanding Cements for Primary Cementing
Expanding Cements for Primary Cementing
Abstract The expansion of cement and the effect of various expansive aids upon oil well cementing compositions have been investigated to determine the amount of e...
FLY ASH FOUNDATION REINFORCED BY CEMENT–SOIL MIXING PILES
FLY ASH FOUNDATION REINFORCED BY CEMENT–SOIL MIXING PILES
Cement-soil mixing piles have been commonly used to enhance the bearing capacity of fly ash stratum and mitigate the settlement damage to the surrounding environment. However, only...
Real-Time Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing for Cement Sheath Integrity Monitoring
Real-Time Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing for Cement Sheath Integrity Monitoring
ABSTRACT: The integrity of cement sheath is critical to oil and gas effective extraction, in which the cement displacement efficiency and solidify quality are the...
Behavior of Nano Calcium Carbonate Modified Smart Cement Contaminated with Oil Based Drilling Mud
Behavior of Nano Calcium Carbonate Modified Smart Cement Contaminated with Oil Based Drilling Mud
Abstract As oil and gas exploration and production expands around the world, there are unique challenges in well construction beginning at the seafloor. There are se...
First Implementation of Self-Healing Cement Systems in H2S/CO2 Aggressive Environment Across Pay-Zone
First Implementation of Self-Healing Cement Systems in H2S/CO2 Aggressive Environment Across Pay-Zone
Abstract Carbonate reservoirs are often characterized by high pressure and high content of H2S and CO2. For these reasons, drilling the reservoir is the most challen...
Cement Evaluation - A Risky Business
Cement Evaluation - A Risky Business
Abstract Cement evaluation is commonly thought of as running a cement bond log (CBL) and attempting to interpret the results to determine if there is isolation in th...
Experiment Study of Stress and Pore Pressure in Setting Cement Paste
Experiment Study of Stress and Pore Pressure in Setting Cement Paste
ABSTRACT: Cement sheath integrity plays an important role in ensuring the wellbore safety. Shear failure, tensile crack or debonding may happen in the cement shea...

Back to Top