Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of Outcomes in Candidemia Between COVID-19 and Non–COVID-19 Patients
View through CrossRef
Background: Fungemia is associated with high rates of morbidity, mortality, and increase in length of hospital stay. Several studies have recognized increased rates of candidemia since the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Patients with candidemia during January through May 2020 were identified through Theradoc. Patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital management, and microbiology were extracted by medical chart review. Patients were divided into cohorts based on COVID-19 status. The Fisher exact and Satterthwaite tests were used for analyses of categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results: Overall, 31 patients developed candidemia and 12 (38.7%) patients tested SARS-CoV-2 positive. Candida glabrata was the most prevalent causative organism in both groups. On average, COVID-19 patients developed fungemia 12.1 days from admission, compared to 17.8 days in the COVID-19 negative or untested cohort (P = .340). Additionally, COVID-19 patients with a fungemia coinfection were significantly more likely to expire; 10 COVID-19 patients (83.3%) died, compared to 7 (36.8%) in the COVID-19–negative or untested cohort (P = .025). The cohorts did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in terms of demographic, comorbidities, hospital management, or coinfections. Conclusions: The prevalence of fungemia in COVID-19 patients is significantly greater than historically reported figures. Known risk factors for candidemia, such as use of corticosteroid, use of central venous catheters, and prolonged ICU length of stay were higher in the SARS-CoV-2–positive cohort in this period, which likely contributed to increased fungemia rates, as these factors are also more pronounced in those with COVID-19. Patients who developed candidemia in the COVID-19 cohort had poorer outcomes than those who were SARS-CoV-2 negative or were untested. Further investigation should be conducted in larger studies.Funding: NoDisclosures: None
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Title: Comparison of Outcomes in Candidemia Between COVID-19 and Non–COVID-19 Patients
Description:
Background: Fungemia is associated with high rates of morbidity, mortality, and increase in length of hospital stay.
Several studies have recognized increased rates of candidemia since the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Patients with candidemia during January through May 2020 were identified through Theradoc.
Patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital management, and microbiology were extracted by medical chart review.
Patients were divided into cohorts based on COVID-19 status.
The Fisher exact and Satterthwaite tests were used for analyses of categorical and continuous variables, respectively.
Results: Overall, 31 patients developed candidemia and 12 (38.
7%) patients tested SARS-CoV-2 positive.
Candida glabrata was the most prevalent causative organism in both groups.
On average, COVID-19 patients developed fungemia 12.
1 days from admission, compared to 17.
8 days in the COVID-19 negative or untested cohort (P = .
340).
Additionally, COVID-19 patients with a fungemia coinfection were significantly more likely to expire; 10 COVID-19 patients (83.
3%) died, compared to 7 (36.
8%) in the COVID-19–negative or untested cohort (P = .
025).
The cohorts did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in terms of demographic, comorbidities, hospital management, or coinfections.
Conclusions: The prevalence of fungemia in COVID-19 patients is significantly greater than historically reported figures.
Known risk factors for candidemia, such as use of corticosteroid, use of central venous catheters, and prolonged ICU length of stay were higher in the SARS-CoV-2–positive cohort in this period, which likely contributed to increased fungemia rates, as these factors are also more pronounced in those with COVID-19.
Patients who developed candidemia in the COVID-19 cohort had poorer outcomes than those who were SARS-CoV-2 negative or were untested.
Further investigation should be conducted in larger studies.
Funding: NoDisclosures: None.
Related Results
P193 Candidemia in coronavirus disease 2019 patients in a university hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina
P193 Candidemia in coronavirus disease 2019 patients in a university hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina
Abstract
Poster session 2, September 22, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
It is known that the incidence and epidemiology of candidemia ...
Incidence and risk factors for COVID‐19 associated candidemia (CAC) in ICU patients
Incidence and risk factors for COVID‐19 associated candidemia (CAC) in ICU patients
AbstractBackgroundCritically ill COVID‐19 patients have a high risk for the development of candidemia due to being exposed to both well‐defined classical risk factors and COVID‐19‐...
P150 Profile of Candidemia in a national level HAI Surveillance Network of India
P150 Profile of Candidemia in a national level HAI Surveillance Network of India
Abstract
Poster session 2, September 22, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
Background...
P-1727. Defining Uncomplicated Candidemia suitable for “shorter is better” Treatment
P-1727. Defining Uncomplicated Candidemia suitable for “shorter is better” Treatment
Abstract
Background
The success of candidemia treatment depends on patient baseline characteristics, as well as clinical ...
Retrospective study of candidemia in patients with hematological malignancies. Clinical features, risk factors and outcome of 76 episodes
Retrospective study of candidemia in patients with hematological malignancies. Clinical features, risk factors and outcome of 76 episodes
A retrospective study of 76 episodes of candidemia in 73 patients with underlying hematological malignancy, from 1988 until 1997, has been conducted to evaluate the clinical charac...
Development and validation of COVID‐19 associated candidemia score (CAC‐Score) in ICU patients
Development and validation of COVID‐19 associated candidemia score (CAC‐Score) in ICU patients
AbstractBackgroundThe development of candidemia is a highly fatal condition in severe COVID‐19 infection.ObjectivesThis study aimed to develop a candidemia prediction score in COVI...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...

