Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Universal Causality
View through CrossRef
Universal Causality is a mathematical framework based on higher-order category theory, which generalizes previous approaches based on directed graphs and regular categories. We present a hierarchical framework called UCLA (Universal Causality Layered Architecture), where at the top-most level, causal interventions are modeled as a higher-order category over simplicial sets and objects. Simplicial sets are contravariant functors from the category of ordinal numbers Δ into sets, and whose morphisms are order-preserving injections and surjections over finite ordered sets. Non-random interventions on causal structures are modeled as face operators that map n-simplices into lower-level simplices. At the second layer, causal models are defined as a category, for example defining the schema of a relational causal model or a symmetric monoidal category representation of DAG models. The third layer corresponds to the data layer in causal inference, where each causal object is mapped functorially into a set of instances using the category of sets and functions between sets. The fourth homotopy layer defines ways of abstractly characterizing causal models in terms of homotopy colimits, defined in terms of the nerve of a category, a functor that converts a causal (category) model into a simplicial object. Each functor between layers is characterized by a universal arrow, which define universal elements and representations through the Yoneda Lemma, and induces a Grothendieck category of elements that enables combining formal causal models with data instances, and is related to the notion of ground graphs in relational causal models. Causal inference between layers is defined as a lifting problem, a commutative diagram whose objects are categories, and whose morphisms are functors that are characterized as different types of fibrations. We illustrate UCLA using a variety of representations, including causal relational models, symmetric monoidal categorical variants of DAG models, and non-graphical representations, such as integer-valued multisets and separoids, and measure-theoretic and topological models.
Title: Universal Causality
Description:
Universal Causality is a mathematical framework based on higher-order category theory, which generalizes previous approaches based on directed graphs and regular categories.
We present a hierarchical framework called UCLA (Universal Causality Layered Architecture), where at the top-most level, causal interventions are modeled as a higher-order category over simplicial sets and objects.
Simplicial sets are contravariant functors from the category of ordinal numbers Δ into sets, and whose morphisms are order-preserving injections and surjections over finite ordered sets.
Non-random interventions on causal structures are modeled as face operators that map n-simplices into lower-level simplices.
At the second layer, causal models are defined as a category, for example defining the schema of a relational causal model or a symmetric monoidal category representation of DAG models.
The third layer corresponds to the data layer in causal inference, where each causal object is mapped functorially into a set of instances using the category of sets and functions between sets.
The fourth homotopy layer defines ways of abstractly characterizing causal models in terms of homotopy colimits, defined in terms of the nerve of a category, a functor that converts a causal (category) model into a simplicial object.
Each functor between layers is characterized by a universal arrow, which define universal elements and representations through the Yoneda Lemma, and induces a Grothendieck category of elements that enables combining formal causal models with data instances, and is related to the notion of ground graphs in relational causal models.
Causal inference between layers is defined as a lifting problem, a commutative diagram whose objects are categories, and whose morphisms are functors that are characterized as different types of fibrations.
We illustrate UCLA using a variety of representations, including causal relational models, symmetric monoidal categorical variants of DAG models, and non-graphical representations, such as integer-valued multisets and separoids, and measure-theoretic and topological models.
Related Results
Macroeconomic determinants of fiscal policy in East Africa: a panel causality analysis
Macroeconomic determinants of fiscal policy in East Africa: a panel causality analysis
PurposeThis study investigates the dynamic causality linkages between fiscal deficits and selected macroeconomic indicators in a panel of five East African Community countries.Desi...
The relationship between money supply and inflation: analysis with PANELVAR approach
The relationship between money supply and inflation: analysis with PANELVAR approach
Purpose- Central banks serve as institutions responsible for executing monetary policy in countries, with the primary objective of managing the money supply and ensuring price stab...
Causality and Markovianity: Information Theoretic Measures
Causality and Markovianity: Information Theoretic Measures
Abstract
Many Information Theoretic Measures have been proposed for a quantitative assessment of causality relationships. While Gouriéroux, Monfort, and Renault (...
KAUSALITAS UTANG LUAR NEGERI, TABUNGAN DOMESTIK, DAN PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI
KAUSALITAS UTANG LUAR NEGERI, TABUNGAN DOMESTIK, DAN PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to examine the causality relationship between foreign borrowing with domestic savings; causality relationship between foreign borrowing and ec...
Sparse Granger Causality Analysis Model Based on Sensors Correlation for Emotion Recognition Classification in Electroencephalography
Sparse Granger Causality Analysis Model Based on Sensors Correlation for Emotion Recognition Classification in Electroencephalography
In recent years, affective computing based on electroencephalogram (EEG) data has attracted increased attention. As a classic EEG feature extraction model, Granger causality analys...
The Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Economic Growth: Rolling-Window Causality Test
The Relationship Between Defense Expenditures and Economic Growth: Rolling-Window Causality Test
Defense expenditures have an essential place in the growth of countries. Defense expenditures and economic growth are frequently linked in the literature. The relationship between ...
LAW OF CONSERVATION OF CAUSALITY FOR THE AU-FIELD
LAW OF CONSERVATION OF CAUSALITY FOR THE AU-FIELD
The law of conservation of causality is one of the cornerstones of the AU-field axiomatics, allowing us to reconcile nonlocality with the principle of the absence of an information...
Interference of Implicit Causality in Relative Clause Processing
Interference of Implicit Causality in Relative Clause Processing
Abstract
Differences in the processing of subject and object relative clauses have been explained by a combination of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic factors, suc...

