Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Measuring disparities in quality of oncology care across oncology practices.
View through CrossRef
6533 Background: Equity is now recognized as an essential aspect of health care quality. Racial inequities in clinical performance diminish overall system performance. We assessed the feasibility and reliability of practice-level measures of racial disparities in chemotherapy-associated emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. Methods: Using fee-for-service Medicare data, we identified 1,196,970 Black or White fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with cancer receiving chemotherapy in 2016-2019, who were attributed to 5511 oncology practices that treated at least 1 Black and 1 White beneficiary (96.4% of all beneficiaries). We studied two CMS quality measures: chemotherapy associated ED visits and chemotherapy associated hospitalizations. For each outcome, we estimated multi-level models with separate practice-level random intercepts for Black and White patients to quantify practice-level Black-White disparities in adjusted rates of these measures and assess the associations of these rates with the proportion of Black patients in the practice. Results: Overall, 108,177 Black and 966,381 White beneficiaries with cancer were treated at 1321 practices with reliable estimates (reliability ≥70%) of Black-White differences in rates of chemotherapy-associated ED visits; 101,411 Black and 915,895 White beneficiaries were treated at 1,012 practices with reliable estimates of chemotherapy-associated hospitalizations. These practices treated 80% or more of all Black and White beneficiaries; 10% of these practices treated 75% of Black beneficiaries. The median adjusted Black-White rate difference across practices was +8.9% [interquartile interval (IQI) +5.0%, +12.8%; 5th, 95th percentile -1.8 to +19.2%] for chemotherapy associated ED visits and +4.4% [IQI +1.3%, +7.7%; 5th, 95th percentile -3.5% to +13.5%] for chemotherapy associated hospitalizations. Chemotherapy-associated ED visit rates were 3.2 percentage points higher for Black vs White patients (P <.001) at the practice with the mean % of Black patients, but the difference was smaller in practices with more Black patients (0.4 percentage points less for each 10% increase in Black share, P <.001). Chemotherapy-associated hospitalization rates were 0.6 percentage points lower for Black vs White patients (P =.01) but did not vary by practice racial composition. Conclusions: Using data from more than 1000 practices over 4 years, we calculated reliable estimates of practice-level racial disparities in chemotherapy-associated ED visits and hospitalizations. Practice-level performance for these quality measures was generally lower for Black versus White beneficiaries. Measuring and providing feedback on practice-level Black-White disparities in oncology performance measures may be one effective tool for advancing racial equity in care quality for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Measuring disparities in quality of oncology care across oncology practices.
Description:
6533 Background: Equity is now recognized as an essential aspect of health care quality.
Racial inequities in clinical performance diminish overall system performance.
We assessed the feasibility and reliability of practice-level measures of racial disparities in chemotherapy-associated emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations.
Methods: Using fee-for-service Medicare data, we identified 1,196,970 Black or White fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with cancer receiving chemotherapy in 2016-2019, who were attributed to 5511 oncology practices that treated at least 1 Black and 1 White beneficiary (96.
4% of all beneficiaries).
We studied two CMS quality measures: chemotherapy associated ED visits and chemotherapy associated hospitalizations.
For each outcome, we estimated multi-level models with separate practice-level random intercepts for Black and White patients to quantify practice-level Black-White disparities in adjusted rates of these measures and assess the associations of these rates with the proportion of Black patients in the practice.
Results: Overall, 108,177 Black and 966,381 White beneficiaries with cancer were treated at 1321 practices with reliable estimates (reliability ≥70%) of Black-White differences in rates of chemotherapy-associated ED visits; 101,411 Black and 915,895 White beneficiaries were treated at 1,012 practices with reliable estimates of chemotherapy-associated hospitalizations.
These practices treated 80% or more of all Black and White beneficiaries; 10% of these practices treated 75% of Black beneficiaries.
The median adjusted Black-White rate difference across practices was +8.
9% [interquartile interval (IQI) +5.
0%, +12.
8%; 5th, 95th percentile -1.
8 to +19.
2%] for chemotherapy associated ED visits and +4.
4% [IQI +1.
3%, +7.
7%; 5th, 95th percentile -3.
5% to +13.
5%] for chemotherapy associated hospitalizations.
Chemotherapy-associated ED visit rates were 3.
2 percentage points higher for Black vs White patients (P <.
001) at the practice with the mean % of Black patients, but the difference was smaller in practices with more Black patients (0.
4 percentage points less for each 10% increase in Black share, P <.
001).
Chemotherapy-associated hospitalization rates were 0.
6 percentage points lower for Black vs White patients (P =.
01) but did not vary by practice racial composition.
Conclusions: Using data from more than 1000 practices over 4 years, we calculated reliable estimates of practice-level racial disparities in chemotherapy-associated ED visits and hospitalizations.
Practice-level performance for these quality measures was generally lower for Black versus White beneficiaries.
Measuring and providing feedback on practice-level Black-White disparities in oncology performance measures may be one effective tool for advancing racial equity in care quality for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
Related Results
Health System Affiliation and Care for Dual-Eligible and Non–Dual-Eligible Medicare Beneficiaries
Health System Affiliation and Care for Dual-Eligible and Non–Dual-Eligible Medicare Beneficiaries
Importance
Physician organization (PO) affiliation with health systems and its association with health care disparities for dual-eligible Medicare and Medicaid ...
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
Towards more goal-oriented care through care coordination and care planning.
The increasing aging of our society is putting increasing pressure on the current organization of care and support. This moved the Flemish government to a thorough reform of primar...
Editorial for the special issue in Nordic Journal of Health Economics: Challenges in Nordic Primary Care
Editorial for the special issue in Nordic Journal of Health Economics: Challenges in Nordic Primary Care
Primary care in the Nordic countries have many similarities but are also different in crucial ways (Olsen et al. 2016). Among the similarities are that Nordic primary care is tax-b...
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals
Abstract
The rapid growth of open access publishing (OAP) has significantly improved the accessibility and dissemination of scientific knowledge. However, this expansion has also c...
Who Cares for Black Women in Health and Health Care
Who Cares for Black Women in Health and Health Care
Black women are often at the center of health disparities research. Black women face sociological, psychological, environmental, and political barriers to health and health care th...
Has the Oncology Care Model improved quality of oncology care?
Has the Oncology Care Model improved quality of oncology care?
2 Background: The Oncology Care Model (OCM) was a voluntary episode-based alternative payment model designed to improve the value of care for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiarie...
The Comprehensive Cancer Centre: Development, Integration, and Implementation
The Comprehensive Cancer Centre: Development, Integration, and Implementation
Cancer has become one of most serious problems for public health, inducing a heavy economic burden on individual and national dimensions. An extensive scope of healthcare experts h...
Abstract IA32: Con: The ACA will not eliminate disparities in cancer screening
Abstract IA32: Con: The ACA will not eliminate disparities in cancer screening
Abstract
While hopes have risen that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will eliminate screening health disparities, we argue that disparities will persist. In this sessi...

