Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Joint Replacement Registries Significantly Reduce Revision Rates
View through CrossRef
Abstract
BackgroundDespite the rapid establishment of joint replacement registries (JRR), its effect on key outcomes such as revision rates is uncertain. While some countries with JRR have recorded reductions in revision rates, other countries without JRR also have reported similar reductions. This study evaluated the impact of JRR on revision rates across countries while controlling for non-JRR related factors and JRR outcomes transfer (to non-registry countries) that could contribute to reduction in revision rates. MethodsThis assessment was performed by a difference-in-differences statistical approach using a panel regression model. We compared revision rates of non-registry countries to registry countries, and further compared non-registry period revision rates to registry period (of registry countries) revision rates. We controlled for non-JRR related factors and JRR outcomes transfer by the inclusion of a linear trend in the model. Data were collected from 1980 – 2018. Registry data were obtained from JRR databases while non-registry data were obtained from literature search in Medline and Google Scholar. ResultsThe average difference in revision rates between registry countries compared to non-registry countries was not statistically significant for hip (p-value = 0.056) and knee (p-value = 0.501) respectively. The average difference in revision rate in the registry period of registry countries relative to the non-registry periods was statistically significant for hip (p-value < 0.0001) and knee (p-value = 0.004) respectively. The impact of JRR on revision rate reduction as a percentage was 19.23% (95% CI: 10.86 – 31.55%) and 13.07% (95% CI: 3.28 – 31.18%) for hip and knee respectively. ConclusionsJoint replacement registries cause significant reduction in revision rates and its effect on this outcome may be further improved by increasing surgeons’ participation. Establishment of JRR in countries or regions yet to would be a worthwhile decision.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Joint Replacement Registries Significantly Reduce Revision Rates
Description:
Abstract
BackgroundDespite the rapid establishment of joint replacement registries (JRR), its effect on key outcomes such as revision rates is uncertain.
While some countries with JRR have recorded reductions in revision rates, other countries without JRR also have reported similar reductions.
This study evaluated the impact of JRR on revision rates across countries while controlling for non-JRR related factors and JRR outcomes transfer (to non-registry countries) that could contribute to reduction in revision rates.
MethodsThis assessment was performed by a difference-in-differences statistical approach using a panel regression model.
We compared revision rates of non-registry countries to registry countries, and further compared non-registry period revision rates to registry period (of registry countries) revision rates.
We controlled for non-JRR related factors and JRR outcomes transfer by the inclusion of a linear trend in the model.
Data were collected from 1980 – 2018.
Registry data were obtained from JRR databases while non-registry data were obtained from literature search in Medline and Google Scholar.
ResultsThe average difference in revision rates between registry countries compared to non-registry countries was not statistically significant for hip (p-value = 0.
056) and knee (p-value = 0.
501) respectively.
The average difference in revision rate in the registry period of registry countries relative to the non-registry periods was statistically significant for hip (p-value < 0.
0001) and knee (p-value = 0.
004) respectively.
The impact of JRR on revision rate reduction as a percentage was 19.
23% (95% CI: 10.
86 – 31.
55%) and 13.
07% (95% CI: 3.
28 – 31.
18%) for hip and knee respectively.
ConclusionsJoint replacement registries cause significant reduction in revision rates and its effect on this outcome may be further improved by increasing surgeons’ participation.
Establishment of JRR in countries or regions yet to would be a worthwhile decision.
Related Results
Long-term results of primary and revision oncological endoprosthetics
Long-term results of primary and revision oncological endoprosthetics
BACKGROUND: Increased overall survival leads to a significant increase in the service life of implants. Currently, no joint replacement systems are failure-free, which reduces the ...
Macroeconomic and Social Precursors of Suicide Rates in the Philippines: A Quantitative Analysis (Preprint)
Macroeconomic and Social Precursors of Suicide Rates in the Philippines: A Quantitative Analysis (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Suicide is a complex, serious and multifaceted public health issue that poses significant challenges to societies worldwide. In fact, it represen...
303 Mapping the Landscape of Surgical Registries in the United Kingdom
303 Mapping the Landscape of Surgical Registries in the United Kingdom
Abstract
Introduction
Well-designed surgical registries are essential for high-quality patient-centred evaluation of implantable...
Physical therapy registries worldwide: A systematic review
Physical therapy registries worldwide: A systematic review
AbstractIntroductionNowadays, the demand for physical therapy services has grown significantly over the last few decades due to an aging population, a rise in chronic conditions, a...
Ethics practices associated with reusing health data: An assessment of patient registries
Ethics practices associated with reusing health data: An assessment of patient registries
Abstract
Background
As routinely collected patient data have become increasingly accessible over the years, more and more atten...
A review of North American orthopaedic trauma and fracture registries
A review of North American orthopaedic trauma and fracture registries
Abstract
In North America, orthopaedic trauma and fracture registries can be broadly categorized into 4 groups: national registries without subscription, national registr...
Epidemiological Surveillance of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Review
Epidemiological Surveillance of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Review
Abstract
Background
Registries and clinical databases are important tools to systematically record and collect information abou...
Review and comparison of orthopaedic registries in the United States and Norway
Review and comparison of orthopaedic registries in the United States and Norway
The global rise in orthopaedic care coupled with increasing costs necessitates surgical auditing. Orthopaedic registries in the United States (US) and Norway survey data to discern...

