Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Biblical Archaeology
View through CrossRef
The term “biblical archaeology” has meant different things to different people at different times. During most of its history, the term was used broadly and included archaeological (and archaeology-related) activities in the biblical lands, mainly the Near East but even beyond it, from prehistory to the medieval period. Later, the term was seen as parochial, narrow, and religiously loaded, and many felt uncomfortable using it, sometimes calling for a “secular archaeology” (e.g., William Dever), and preferring instead terms such as “Syria-Palestinian archaeology,” “Near Eastern archaeology,” or “archaeology of the Levant.” The change has also been connected with the decrease in the historical value attributed to the biblical narratives, and to political correctness. The term, nevertheless, is still widely used, and many scholars speak today about “new biblical archaeology.” Geographically, the new term is narrower, covering mainly the Land of Israel (also known as the southern Levant, Palestine, or the Holy Land; roughly covering the area of modern Israel, Jordan, and the Palestinian Authority). Chronologically, it still covers a long period, but a difference exists between Israeli usage and American/European usage. Both “groups” begin the era with the start of the Bronze Age (although all agree that there was nothing “biblical” in those periods). For Israeli scholars, however, the biblical period refers to the time covered in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament), and it ends by the Late Iron Age, or the Persian period. For most American and European scholars, especially in the past, the term embraced the Hellenistic period, the Roman period, and perhaps even the Byzantine period. Today, however, scholars specialize either in the early periods (Bronze and Iron Ages) or in the later (Hellenistic-Byzantine) periods, and the term “biblical archaeology” is becoming synonymous with the Bronze and Iron Ages (including the Persian period). Indeed, these are the periods that will receive most attention here. Although originally the “child” of biblical studies and archaeology, in its current usage the term is not necessarily connected with the Bible; rather, it relates to studies of a certain era in a certain region. Due to the wide definitions of biblical archaeology, and in light of the differences in meanings associated with it, the boundaries between biblical archaeology and other disciplines are not always clear cut, and they have changed over the course of the discipline’s history. Therefore, the following sections will address some works that are not archaeological in nature. Notably, this article will usually not refer to excavation reports or technical ceramic studies.
Title: Biblical Archaeology
Description:
The term “biblical archaeology” has meant different things to different people at different times.
During most of its history, the term was used broadly and included archaeological (and archaeology-related) activities in the biblical lands, mainly the Near East but even beyond it, from prehistory to the medieval period.
Later, the term was seen as parochial, narrow, and religiously loaded, and many felt uncomfortable using it, sometimes calling for a “secular archaeology” (e.
g.
, William Dever), and preferring instead terms such as “Syria-Palestinian archaeology,” “Near Eastern archaeology,” or “archaeology of the Levant.
” The change has also been connected with the decrease in the historical value attributed to the biblical narratives, and to political correctness.
The term, nevertheless, is still widely used, and many scholars speak today about “new biblical archaeology.
” Geographically, the new term is narrower, covering mainly the Land of Israel (also known as the southern Levant, Palestine, or the Holy Land; roughly covering the area of modern Israel, Jordan, and the Palestinian Authority).
Chronologically, it still covers a long period, but a difference exists between Israeli usage and American/European usage.
Both “groups” begin the era with the start of the Bronze Age (although all agree that there was nothing “biblical” in those periods).
For Israeli scholars, however, the biblical period refers to the time covered in the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament), and it ends by the Late Iron Age, or the Persian period.
For most American and European scholars, especially in the past, the term embraced the Hellenistic period, the Roman period, and perhaps even the Byzantine period.
Today, however, scholars specialize either in the early periods (Bronze and Iron Ages) or in the later (Hellenistic-Byzantine) periods, and the term “biblical archaeology” is becoming synonymous with the Bronze and Iron Ages (including the Persian period).
Indeed, these are the periods that will receive most attention here.
Although originally the “child” of biblical studies and archaeology, in its current usage the term is not necessarily connected with the Bible; rather, it relates to studies of a certain era in a certain region.
Due to the wide definitions of biblical archaeology, and in light of the differences in meanings associated with it, the boundaries between biblical archaeology and other disciplines are not always clear cut, and they have changed over the course of the discipline’s history.
Therefore, the following sections will address some works that are not archaeological in nature.
Notably, this article will usually not refer to excavation reports or technical ceramic studies.
Related Results
Latino/a/e and Latin American Biblical Interpretation
Latino/a/e and Latin American Biblical Interpretation
Latino/a/e biblical interpretation refers to the analysis of biblical texts, of interpretations of biblical texts, and of the process of interpretation itself from the perspective ...
The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Narrative
The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Narrative
Comprised of contributions from scholars across the globe, The Oxford Handbook to Biblical Narrative offers critical treatments of both the Bible’s narratives and topics related to...
An Adventist Missiological Response to Traditional Beliefs in Kenya
An Adventist Missiological Response to Traditional Beliefs in Kenya
Problem Seventh-day Adventist Christians in Kenya struggle to practice pure biblical teaching because many still practice African traditional beliefs. Many traditional beliefs are...
Archaeology and Material Culture of Judah and the Judeans (ca. 1000–586 bce)
Archaeology and Material Culture of Judah and the Judeans (ca. 1000–586 bce)
The kingdom of Judah was a small political state that arose in the southern Levantine hill country during the Iron Age and was eventually conquered by the Babylonian king Nebuchadn...
Archaeology, Greco-Roman
Archaeology, Greco-Roman
Greco-Roman archaeology is an indispensable source of scholarship for biblical scholars. Those who work in a largely textual discipline benefit from conversation with archaeologist...
The Pedagogical Significance of Biblical Languages in African Theological Education
The Pedagogical Significance of Biblical Languages in African Theological Education
This study discusses The Pedagogical Significance of Biblical Languages in African Theological Education, focusing on the declining proficiency in biblical languages such as Hebrew...
Cognitive Science Approaches in Biblical Studies
Cognitive Science Approaches in Biblical Studies
Since the mid-2000s, cognitive science approaches have been used in biblical studies. Cognitive science came into existence in the 1950s as a reaction to the psychological behavior...
Modern Scotland: Archaeology, the Modern past and the Modern present
Modern Scotland: Archaeology, the Modern past and the Modern present
The main recommendations of the panel report can be summarised under five key headings: HUMANITY The Panel recommends recognition that research in this field should be geared tow...

