Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Feasibility of using his bundle pacing with boston scientific generators

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction His bundle pacing (HBP) aims to deliver physiological activation of the ventricles via the native His-Purkinje conduction system. A challenge of HBP is the limited market of implantation tools, pacing leads and specifically designed pacing algorithms. Purpose Over the last three years both Medtronic (MDT) and Boston Scientific (BSC) generators have been used for HBP in a large tertiary centre. We examined whether there was any difference between lead parameters and battery longevity depending on the type of manufacturer used. Methods Patients implanted with a MDT Select Secure model 3830 lead were included in this retrospective study. Data collected included HBP thresholds (analysed at 1ms pulse width) at implant and at the most recent device check, HBP percentages and battery longevity (months). Battery longevity were calculated by adding duration of follow up and estimated battery life at last follow up. Results A total of 31 patients were included for data analysis (58% male and mean age 72 years). 18 patients had MDT generators of which 3 were PPMs, 5 were CRT-Ps and 10 were CRT-Ds. 13 patients had BSC generators of which 5 were PPMs, 5 were CRT-Ps and 3 were CRT-Ds. Mean follow up of the cohort was 12.7±9.02 months. Mean HBP percentages were 77±37% and 72.2±42.1% for MDT and BSC, respectively (p=0.430). Mean HBP threshold (Volts) at implant was significantly lower with BSC vs MDT (0.85±0.58 vs 1.84±1.06, p=0.01), and similar after follow up (1.01±0.91 vs 1.32±0.73, p=NS). There were no statistically significant differences between mean HBP threshold at implant compared to follow up for both manufacturers. Interestingly, mean battery longevity for BSC vs MDT generators was significantly higher (136±29.3 vs 90.5±29.1, p<0.001). Longevity was also compared for PPM/CRT-P and CRT-D separately. For PPM/CRT-P, BSC generators had significantly higher longevity as compared to MDT (141.6±33.1 vs 91.6±34.5, p=0.009). This difference was not observed for CRT-Ds between the 2 manufacturers (p=0.068). Conclusion Our results suggest HBP with MDT Select Secure 3830 lead is feasible with BSC generators. There is potentially greater battery longevity with BSC compared to MDT generators. Further studies are needed with greater numbers and longer follow up to confirm this finding. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.
Title: Feasibility of using his bundle pacing with boston scientific generators
Description:
Abstract Introduction His bundle pacing (HBP) aims to deliver physiological activation of the ventricles via the native His-Purkinje conduction system.
A challenge of HBP is the limited market of implantation tools, pacing leads and specifically designed pacing algorithms.
Purpose Over the last three years both Medtronic (MDT) and Boston Scientific (BSC) generators have been used for HBP in a large tertiary centre.
We examined whether there was any difference between lead parameters and battery longevity depending on the type of manufacturer used.
Methods Patients implanted with a MDT Select Secure model 3830 lead were included in this retrospective study.
Data collected included HBP thresholds (analysed at 1ms pulse width) at implant and at the most recent device check, HBP percentages and battery longevity (months).
Battery longevity were calculated by adding duration of follow up and estimated battery life at last follow up.
Results A total of 31 patients were included for data analysis (58% male and mean age 72 years).
18 patients had MDT generators of which 3 were PPMs, 5 were CRT-Ps and 10 were CRT-Ds.
13 patients had BSC generators of which 5 were PPMs, 5 were CRT-Ps and 3 were CRT-Ds.
Mean follow up of the cohort was 12.
7±9.
02 months.
Mean HBP percentages were 77±37% and 72.
2±42.
1% for MDT and BSC, respectively (p=0.
430).
Mean HBP threshold (Volts) at implant was significantly lower with BSC vs MDT (0.
85±0.
58 vs 1.
84±1.
06, p=0.
01), and similar after follow up (1.
01±0.
91 vs 1.
32±0.
73, p=NS).
There were no statistically significant differences between mean HBP threshold at implant compared to follow up for both manufacturers.
Interestingly, mean battery longevity for BSC vs MDT generators was significantly higher (136±29.
3 vs 90.
5±29.
1, p<0.
001).
Longevity was also compared for PPM/CRT-P and CRT-D separately.
For PPM/CRT-P, BSC generators had significantly higher longevity as compared to MDT (141.
6±33.
1 vs 91.
6±34.
5, p=0.
009).
This difference was not observed for CRT-Ds between the 2 manufacturers (p=0.
068).
Conclusion Our results suggest HBP with MDT Select Secure 3830 lead is feasible with BSC generators.
There is potentially greater battery longevity with BSC compared to MDT generators.
Further studies are needed with greater numbers and longer follow up to confirm this finding.
Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Related Results

e0650 The effects of biventricular synchronous pacing on CBF, MVO2 and CWE in dogs
e0650 The effects of biventricular synchronous pacing on CBF, MVO2 and CWE in dogs
Objective To compare the effects of biventricular synchronous pacing with different pacing site on coronary Blood flow (CBF), myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2)...
Approach to Left Bundle Branch Pacing
Approach to Left Bundle Branch Pacing
Cardiac pacing refers to the implantation tool serving as a treatment modality for various indications, the most common of which is symptomatic bradyarrhythmia. Left bundle branch ...
Acute Changes in Cardiac Synchrony and Output According to RV Pacing Sites in Koreans with Normal Cardiac Function
Acute Changes in Cardiac Synchrony and Output According to RV Pacing Sites in Koreans with Normal Cardiac Function
Introduction: The synchrony of the pacing heart can be affected by the right ventricular (RV) pacing site and is crucial to cardiac function in pacemaker recipients. We evaluated t...
Changes in pacing variation with increasing race duration in ultra-triathlon races
Changes in pacing variation with increasing race duration in ultra-triathlon races
Abstract Background: Despite the increasing scientific interest in the relationship between pacing and performance in endurance sports, little information is available abou...
Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
Left bundle branch area pacing: Electrocardiographic features
Background Left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing emerged as a promising alternative to His bundle (HB) pacing in difficult cases of physiological pacing and failed cases of cardiac ...
Long‐Term Follow‐up Impact of Dual‐Chamber Pacing on Patients with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
Long‐Term Follow‐up Impact of Dual‐Chamber Pacing on Patients with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
BackgroundPacing has been proposed as a treatment for patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), but there are few studies with long‐term follow‐up. We evaluated...
Effects of Right Ventricular Nonapical Pacing on Cardiac Function: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Effects of Right Ventricular Nonapical Pacing on Cardiac Function: A Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
BackgroundA meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare the effects of right ventricular nonapical (RVNA) and right ventricular apical (RVA) pacin...
The role of affect in pacing: experimental study
The role of affect in pacing: experimental study
People with chronic pain often change the way they carry out their daily activities according to different patterns, among which are pacing strategies. Cross-sectional studies on t...

Back to Top