Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

How to Deal with Armenia’s Geopolitical Trilemma? Examining Public Opinion

View through CrossRef
This article focuses on the analysis of foreign policy attitudes and perceptions within Armenia’s society. The analysis is based on the comparison and interpretation of results of various quantitative surveys conducted in Armenia from 2009 to 2015. The results of this comparative chronological analysis are compared with the basic principles of official foreign policy, enshrined in the National Security Strategy of Armenia (2007). In this framework, the core emphasis is placed perceptions of European and Eurasian dimensions of Armenia’s foreign policy. The objective of this analysis is to identify the existing and changing features of the foreign policy orientation within Armenia’s society. It is concluded that for Armenia’s society there was and is not any “Eurasian”, but only a “Russian” choice: the vast majority of Armenia’s population considers relations with Russia as strategic and as based not on economic or socio-cultural, but mainly on political (security) reasons. However, absolute majority also welcomes Armenia’s broad cooperation with West, especially with the EU. Moreover, the majority even stands for Armenia’s membership in the European Union alongside with the membership in the Eurasian Union.
Title: How to Deal with Armenia’s Geopolitical Trilemma? Examining Public Opinion
Description:
This article focuses on the analysis of foreign policy attitudes and perceptions within Armenia’s society.
The analysis is based on the comparison and interpretation of results of various quantitative surveys conducted in Armenia from 2009 to 2015.
The results of this comparative chronological analysis are compared with the basic principles of official foreign policy, enshrined in the National Security Strategy of Armenia (2007).
In this framework, the core emphasis is placed perceptions of European and Eurasian dimensions of Armenia’s foreign policy.
The objective of this analysis is to identify the existing and changing features of the foreign policy orientation within Armenia’s society.
It is concluded that for Armenia’s society there was and is not any “Eurasian”, but only a “Russian” choice: the vast majority of Armenia’s population considers relations with Russia as strategic and as based not on economic or socio-cultural, but mainly on political (security) reasons.
However, absolute majority also welcomes Armenia’s broad cooperation with West, especially with the EU.
Moreover, the majority even stands for Armenia’s membership in the European Union alongside with the membership in the Eurasian Union.

Related Results

MODERN DETERMINANTS OF UKRAINIAN GEOPOLITICAL SPACE: NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN ASPECTS
MODERN DETERMINANTS OF UKRAINIAN GEOPOLITICAL SPACE: NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN ASPECTS
Objective determinants of geopolitical space of Ukraine are characterised, which at the present stage is manifested from geospatial position in economic, ideological, information- ...
Assessing Geopolitical Risks and Their Economic Impact on the USA Using Data Analytics
Assessing Geopolitical Risks and Their Economic Impact on the USA Using Data Analytics
Understanding geopolitical risks is a paramount aspect of examining the stability and resilience of national economies, specifically in today’s rapidly evolving global surroundings...
Aspect level public opinion detection, tracking and visualization on social media
Aspect level public opinion detection, tracking and visualization on social media
The desire, want, and thinking of the majority of people on one issue or problem is called Public Opinion. Public opinions have various impacts on many perspectives of human societ...
Modern Armenia
Modern Armenia
Abstract The Armenian people entered the modern era with their historic lands of more than three millennia divided between two empires—the Ottoman and Persian emp...
Mental Time-Travel, Semantic Flexibility, and A.I. Ethics
Mental Time-Travel, Semantic Flexibility, and A.I. Ethics
This article argues that existing approaches to programming ethical AI fail to resolve a serious moral-semantic trilemma, generating interpretations of ethical requirements that ar...
ARTSAKH IN THE GEOPOLITICAL AGENDA OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE
ARTSAKH IN THE GEOPOLITICAL AGENDA OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS: BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE
The Third Artsakh war demonstrated the transformation of the geopolitical environment in the South Caucasus. In this context, the article aims to identify the main potential scenar...
Jews in Armenia in the Ancient Period (First Century BCE to Fifth Century CE)
Jews in Armenia in the Ancient Period (First Century BCE to Fifth Century CE)
The first Armenian literary source to mention Jews in Armenia is the history ascribed to P‘awstos Buzand (fifth century CE). The long passage that refers to multitudes of Jewish fa...
Foot-and-mouth disease in Armenia (1958–2003): Historical epidemiology, serotype dynamics, and evolving vaccination strategies
Foot-and-mouth disease in Armenia (1958–2003): Historical epidemiology, serotype dynamics, and evolving vaccination strategies
Background and Aim: Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious transboundary animal disease affecting clo­ven-hoofed livestock, with significant economic and trade implica...

Back to Top