Javascript must be enabled to continue!
How to Deal with Armenia’s Geopolitical Trilemma? Examining Public Opinion
View through CrossRef
This article focuses on the analysis of foreign policy attitudes and perceptions within Armenia’s society. The analysis is based on the comparison and interpretation of results of various quantitative surveys conducted in Armenia from 2009 to 2015. The results of this comparative chronological analysis are compared with the basic principles of official foreign policy, enshrined in the National Security Strategy of Armenia (2007). In this framework, the core emphasis is placed perceptions of European and Eurasian dimensions of Armenia’s foreign policy. The objective of this analysis is to identify the existing and changing features of the foreign policy orientation within Armenia’s society. It is concluded that for Armenia’s society there was and is not any “Eurasian”, but only a “Russian” choice: the vast majority of Armenia’s population considers relations with Russia as strategic and as based not on economic or socio-cultural, but mainly on political (security) reasons. However, absolute majority also welcomes Armenia’s broad cooperation with West, especially with the EU. Moreover, the majority even stands for Armenia’s membership in the European Union alongside with the membership in the Eurasian Union.
Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
Title: How to Deal with Armenia’s Geopolitical Trilemma? Examining Public Opinion
Description:
This article focuses on the analysis of foreign policy attitudes and perceptions within Armenia’s society.
The analysis is based on the comparison and interpretation of results of various quantitative surveys conducted in Armenia from 2009 to 2015.
The results of this comparative chronological analysis are compared with the basic principles of official foreign policy, enshrined in the National Security Strategy of Armenia (2007).
In this framework, the core emphasis is placed perceptions of European and Eurasian dimensions of Armenia’s foreign policy.
The objective of this analysis is to identify the existing and changing features of the foreign policy orientation within Armenia’s society.
It is concluded that for Armenia’s society there was and is not any “Eurasian”, but only a “Russian” choice: the vast majority of Armenia’s population considers relations with Russia as strategic and as based not on economic or socio-cultural, but mainly on political (security) reasons.
However, absolute majority also welcomes Armenia’s broad cooperation with West, especially with the EU.
Moreover, the majority even stands for Armenia’s membership in the European Union alongside with the membership in the Eurasian Union.
Related Results
MODERN DETERMINANTS OF UKRAINIAN GEOPOLITICAL SPACE: NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN ASPECTS
MODERN DETERMINANTS OF UKRAINIAN GEOPOLITICAL SPACE: NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN ASPECTS
Objective determinants of geopolitical space of Ukraine are characterised, which at the present stage is manifested from geospatial position in economic, ideological, information- ...
Assessing Geopolitical Risks and Their Economic Impact on the USA Using Data Analytics
Assessing Geopolitical Risks and Their Economic Impact on the USA Using Data Analytics
Understanding geopolitical risks is a paramount aspect of examining the stability and resilience of national economies, specifically in today’s rapidly evolving global surroundings...
Determinants of Sterilisation using Trilemma Policy: A study in Qatar, Kuwait, Indonesia, and Japan
Determinants of Sterilisation using Trilemma Policy: A study in Qatar, Kuwait, Indonesia, and Japan
Trilemma policy is a concept of international economics in which it is impossible to gain all three variables at once or also known as Mundell-Fleming framework. Trilemma policies ...
Aspect level public opinion detection, tracking and visualization on social media
Aspect level public opinion detection, tracking and visualization on social media
The desire, want, and thinking of the majority of people on one issue or problem is called Public Opinion. Public opinions have various impacts on many perspectives of human societ...
Beyond Geopolitical Shocks: How Institutional Quality and Ownership Structure Heterogeneity Shape Nonlinear Banking Resilience in MENA
Beyond Geopolitical Shocks: How Institutional Quality and Ownership Structure Heterogeneity Shape Nonlinear Banking Resilience in MENA
Abstract
Geopolitical tensions have become an increasingly important source of uncertainty affecting financial resilience, particularly in regions characterized by ...
Modern Armenia
Modern Armenia
Abstract
The Armenian people entered the modern era with their historic lands of more than three millennia divided between two empires—the Ottoman and Persian emp...
MEINUNGSLOSE BÄUERLICHE BEVÖLKERUNG:‐SEKUNDÄRANALYSE EINER BEFRAGUNG IN BAYERN‐
MEINUNGSLOSE BÄUERLICHE BEVÖLKERUNG:‐SEKUNDÄRANALYSE EINER BEFRAGUNG IN BAYERN‐
SummaryRUKAL NO OPINION POPULATION ANALYSIS OF A PUBLIC OPINION POLL IN BAVARIAStimulated by a paper given by Leverkus‐Brüning a secondary analysis of a representative public opini...
Navigating Geopolitical Risks in Global Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review
Navigating Geopolitical Risks in Global Supply Chains: A Systematic Literature Review
Geopolitical risks have increased in frequency and magnitude of impact in recent years, disrupting the supply chains of multinational companies. We conducted a systematic literatur...

