Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

2020/29 Legal status of electronic forms of employment

View through CrossRef
2020/29 Legal status of electronic forms of employment The UK Employment Tribunals and England and Wales Court of Appeal (case [2018] EWCA Civ 2748) have ruled that any Uber driver who has the Uber App switched on, is in the territory where he/she is authorised to work, and is able and willing to accept assignments, is working for Uber under a worker contract. The UK courts disregarded some of the provisions of Uber’s driver agreement. They had been entitled to do so because the relevant provisions of the driver agreement did not reflect the reality of the bargain made between the parties. The fact that Uber interviews and recruits drivers, controls the key information, requires drivers to accept trips, sets the route, fixes the fare, imposes numerous conditions on drivers, determines remuneration, amends the driver’s terms unilaterally, and handles complaints by passengers, makes it a transportation or passenger carrier, not an information and electronic technology provider. Therefore the UK courts resolved the central issue of for whom (Uber) and under a contract with whom (Uber), drivers perform their services. Uber is a modern business phenomenon. Regardless of its special position in business, Uber is obliged to follow the rules according to which work is neither a commodity nor an online technology.
Title: 2020/29 Legal status of electronic forms of employment
Description:
2020/29 Legal status of electronic forms of employment The UK Employment Tribunals and England and Wales Court of Appeal (case [2018] EWCA Civ 2748) have ruled that any Uber driver who has the Uber App switched on, is in the territory where he/she is authorised to work, and is able and willing to accept assignments, is working for Uber under a worker contract.
The UK courts disregarded some of the provisions of Uber’s driver agreement.
They had been entitled to do so because the relevant provisions of the driver agreement did not reflect the reality of the bargain made between the parties.
The fact that Uber interviews and recruits drivers, controls the key information, requires drivers to accept trips, sets the route, fixes the fare, imposes numerous conditions on drivers, determines remuneration, amends the driver’s terms unilaterally, and handles complaints by passengers, makes it a transportation or passenger carrier, not an information and electronic technology provider.
Therefore the UK courts resolved the central issue of for whom (Uber) and under a contract with whom (Uber), drivers perform their services.
Uber is a modern business phenomenon.
Regardless of its special position in business, Uber is obliged to follow the rules according to which work is neither a commodity nor an online technology.

Related Results

Research on the Evaluation and Influencing Factors of China’s Provincial Employment Quality Based on Principal Tensor Analysis
Research on the Evaluation and Influencing Factors of China’s Provincial Employment Quality Based on Principal Tensor Analysis
The research on the quality of employment in China holds immense significance for attaining high-quality employment development. Firstly, enhancing the quality of employment facili...
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
THE ANALOGY OF STATUTE AND THE ANALOGY OF LAW AS DOCTRINAL INSTRUMENTS FOR LEGAL RESPONSE TO ECONOMIC CHALLENGES
Ukraine's contemporary legal system is undergoing a period of significant transformation, which necessitates not only a robust and stable legal framework, but also a flexible doctr...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
TRENDS AND CONTRADICTIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL TECH
Problem setting. Digitalization has recently become increasingly important in the professional everyday life of a lawyer. Since 2020, trends in the automation of legal processes ha...
Labor Adjustment Dynamics in Brazilian Manufacturing
Labor Adjustment Dynamics in Brazilian Manufacturing
In this paper we investigate the dynamics of labor adjustment at the firm level in Brazilian manufacturing, using information on average hours per worker to measure employment devi...
Research on the Evaluation and Influencing Factors of China's Provincial Employment Quality Based on Principal Tensor Analysis
Research on the Evaluation and Influencing Factors of China's Provincial Employment Quality Based on Principal Tensor Analysis
This study aimed to use spatiotemporal tensor data to measure the level of employment quality in China's provinces and analyzed the magnitude and direction of its influencing facto...
Active labor market policies in Bolivia: Impact of the Employment Support Program II
Active labor market policies in Bolivia: Impact of the Employment Support Program II
Active labor market policies are a set of public policy instruments that seek to promote labor market integration, especially for groups with low levels of employability and income...
Legal clinical education as a socially oriented educational activity in the field of law
Legal clinical education as a socially oriented educational activity in the field of law
The article is devoted to the general theoretical characteristics of one of the non-traditional forms and methods of teaching — legal clinical education as a means of forming a new...

Back to Top