Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Testimony and Assertion
View through CrossRef
Two models of assertion are described and their epistemological implications considered. The assurance model draws a parallel between the ethical norms surrounding speech acts like promising and the epistemic norms that govern the transmission of testimonial knowledge. This model is rejected in favour of the view that assertion transmits knowledge by (intentionally) expressing belief. The expression of belief is distinguished from the communication of belief. The chapter goes on to compare the epistemology of testimony with the epistemology of memory, arguing that memory and testimony are mechanisms that can preserve the rationality of the belief they transmit without preserving the evidence on which the belief was originally based.
Title: Testimony and Assertion
Description:
Two models of assertion are described and their epistemological implications considered.
The assurance model draws a parallel between the ethical norms surrounding speech acts like promising and the epistemic norms that govern the transmission of testimonial knowledge.
This model is rejected in favour of the view that assertion transmits knowledge by (intentionally) expressing belief.
The expression of belief is distinguished from the communication of belief.
The chapter goes on to compare the epistemology of testimony with the epistemology of memory, arguing that memory and testimony are mechanisms that can preserve the rationality of the belief they transmit without preserving the evidence on which the belief was originally based.
Related Results
Testimony/Bearing Witness
Testimony/Bearing Witness
What is the epistemological value of testimony? What role does language, images, and memory play in its construction? What is the relationship between the person who attests and th...
6. Testimony
6. Testimony
Does listening to other people—or reading what they have written—supply us with knowledge in a unique or distinctive way? Do we need special reasons to trust people in order to gai...
Inference to the Best Explanation and the Receipt of Testimony
Inference to the Best Explanation and the Receipt of Testimony
The chapter develops a local reductionist account of what is required for testimonial beliefs to be justified, and argues that human recipients of testimony typically form their be...
Criminal Testimonial Injustice
Criminal Testimonial Injustice
Abstract
Through a detailed analysis that draws on work across philosophy, the law, and social psychology, this book shows that, from the very beginning of the Ameri...
Testimony and Trauma
Testimony and Trauma
Jesus’ crucifixion was a traumatic event. After Jesus’ resurrection, the disciples were both astonished and terrified—Jesus was no longer dead, but the wounds from the crucifixion ...
Human Testimony
Human Testimony
Burge maintains that human beings are entitled to accept the testimony of other human beings simply in virtue of the fact that we are all rational believers. Reid maintains that hu...

