Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Financial Risk Protection among Health-Insured and Non-Insured Diabetic Patients in Kaduna, North West Nigeria

View through CrossRef
Context: Diabetes mellitus poses a significant health and economic burden in Nigeria. With limited resources and a heavy reliance on out-of-pocket payments for healthcare, the cost of diabetes mellitus management creates financial hardships for individuals and households. Aim: This study aimed to compare financial risk protection between health-insured and non-insured diabetic patients in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Materials and Methods: It was a hospital-based cross-sectional study, involving 250 health-insured and 250 non-insured diabetic patients. Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0. Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used for comparison between different groups with statistical significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Results: About 70% and 65% of the health-insured and non-insured patients, respectively, were protected from financial risk, with no statistically significant difference observed between the groups. Financial risk protection was significantly associated with levels of education ( P = 0.001), occupation ( P = 0.019), and religion ( P = 0.018) in the health-insured group, while occupation ( P = 0.015), income (0.012), and duration of diabetes ( P = 0.001) were the statistically significant factors associated with financial risk protection among the non-insured group. Higher education and income levels positively impacted protection, while longer diabetes duration reduces the likelihood of financial risk protection. Conclusion: No significant difference was found in financial risk protection between health-insured and non-insured diabetic patients. Collaborative efforts between the NHIA, Health Maintenance Organizations, and healthcare service providers are recommended to improve the breadth and scope of coverage for diabetes mellitus treatments within the National Health Insurance Scheme to ensure adequate financial risk protection.
Title: Comparison of Financial Risk Protection among Health-Insured and Non-Insured Diabetic Patients in Kaduna, North West Nigeria
Description:
Context: Diabetes mellitus poses a significant health and economic burden in Nigeria.
With limited resources and a heavy reliance on out-of-pocket payments for healthcare, the cost of diabetes mellitus management creates financial hardships for individuals and households.
Aim: This study aimed to compare financial risk protection between health-insured and non-insured diabetic patients in Kaduna State, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods: It was a hospital-based cross-sectional study, involving 250 health-insured and 250 non-insured diabetic patients.
Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.
Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used for comparison between different groups with statistical significance set at P ≤ 0.
05.
Results: About 70% and 65% of the health-insured and non-insured patients, respectively, were protected from financial risk, with no statistically significant difference observed between the groups.
Financial risk protection was significantly associated with levels of education ( P = 0.
001), occupation ( P = 0.
019), and religion ( P = 0.
018) in the health-insured group, while occupation ( P = 0.
015), income (0.
012), and duration of diabetes ( P = 0.
001) were the statistically significant factors associated with financial risk protection among the non-insured group.
Higher education and income levels positively impacted protection, while longer diabetes duration reduces the likelihood of financial risk protection.
Conclusion: No significant difference was found in financial risk protection between health-insured and non-insured diabetic patients.
Collaborative efforts between the NHIA, Health Maintenance Organizations, and healthcare service providers are recommended to improve the breadth and scope of coverage for diabetes mellitus treatments within the National Health Insurance Scheme to ensure adequate financial risk protection.

Related Results

SETTLEMENT OF DEFAULTS IN THE LIFE INSURANCE POLICY BETWEEN THE INSURER AND THE INSURED
SETTLEMENT OF DEFAULTS IN THE LIFE INSURANCE POLICY BETWEEN THE INSURER AND THE INSURED
When the policy holder or insurance participant or the insured experiences a disaster or suffers a loss or damage as stated in the contract, the insured has the right to file an in...
Effect of health insurance on direct hospitalisation costs for in-patients with ischaemic stroke in China
Effect of health insurance on direct hospitalisation costs for in-patients with ischaemic stroke in China
Objectives The aim of the present study was to determine the direct medical costs of hospitalisations for ischaemic stroke (IS) in-patients with different types...
THE PREVALENCE OF SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN IN TWO SELECTED LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN KADUNA STATE, NIGERIA
THE PREVALENCE OF SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN IN TWO SELECTED LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN KADUNA STATE, NIGERIA
It is imperative that all children must be educated irrespective of their disability. This can only be possible if their disability is identified early enough for proper interventi...
Renal biopsy in diabetic patients: Histopathological and clinical correlations
Renal biopsy in diabetic patients: Histopathological and clinical correlations
Introduction: Diabetes is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease worldwide. A kidney biopsy in a diabetic patient must be considered when non-diab...
GW24-e3068 The risk factors analysis and follow-up study of prehypertensive diabetic patients
GW24-e3068 The risk factors analysis and follow-up study of prehypertensive diabetic patients
Objectives To analyse the prevalence and risk factors of prehypertension among normal blood pressure diabetic patients. To assess the renal function of prehyperte...

Back to Top