Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Workflows for continuous protein structure prediction benchmarking
View through CrossRef
CAMEO - Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (https://www.cameo3d.org) – continuously evaluates the performance of public servers for 3D Protein Structure Prediction (3D), Quality Estimation (QE) and Residue-Residue Contact Prediction (CP). CAMEO[1] is hinged on the weekly PDB pre-release of amino acid sequences as part of the PDB release of experimentally determined macromolecular structures. Typically, 20 protein sequences are selected as the target set and submitted to the participating servers for CAMEO 3D and CP categories. For CAMEO QE model coordinates of the CAMEO 3D servers are subsequently submitted. All servers return predictions to CAMEO until the following Wednesday. For the evaluation, the coordinates released by the PDB are used as reference, and the assessments are then published on cameo3d.org for interactive performance analyses.
For CAMEO 3D 6736 targets were evaluated over 375 weeks, rapidly accumulating data for testing new developments on unseen and independent data.
The CAMEO team contributed to the development of the community-agnostic data model within OpenEBench[2], allowing unified access to benchmarking data. The CAMEO workflows have recently been ported to NextFlow, resulting in a more robust and parallel setup to run on e.g. OpenEBench resources.
CAMEO evaluates various aspects of protein structure modeling with different scores. The developers of prediction servers benefit of rapid assessment of new developments and continuous monitoring of their public servers, thereby complementing the bi-annual CASP effort[3]. CAMEO allows life scientists to better understand which public modeling server is the most suited for their specific use case.
Title: Workflows for continuous protein structure prediction benchmarking
Description:
CAMEO - Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (https://www.
cameo3d.
org) – continuously evaluates the performance of public servers for 3D Protein Structure Prediction (3D), Quality Estimation (QE) and Residue-Residue Contact Prediction (CP).
CAMEO[1] is hinged on the weekly PDB pre-release of amino acid sequences as part of the PDB release of experimentally determined macromolecular structures.
Typically, 20 protein sequences are selected as the target set and submitted to the participating servers for CAMEO 3D and CP categories.
For CAMEO QE model coordinates of the CAMEO 3D servers are subsequently submitted.
All servers return predictions to CAMEO until the following Wednesday.
For the evaluation, the coordinates released by the PDB are used as reference, and the assessments are then published on cameo3d.
org for interactive performance analyses.
For CAMEO 3D 6736 targets were evaluated over 375 weeks, rapidly accumulating data for testing new developments on unseen and independent data.
The CAMEO team contributed to the development of the community-agnostic data model within OpenEBench[2], allowing unified access to benchmarking data.
The CAMEO workflows have recently been ported to NextFlow, resulting in a more robust and parallel setup to run on e.
g.
OpenEBench resources.
CAMEO evaluates various aspects of protein structure modeling with different scores.
The developers of prediction servers benefit of rapid assessment of new developments and continuous monitoring of their public servers, thereby complementing the bi-annual CASP effort[3].
CAMEO allows life scientists to better understand which public modeling server is the most suited for their specific use case.
Related Results
7
th
International Symposium on Enabling Technologies for Life Sciences (ETP)
7
th
International Symposium on Enabling Technologies for Life Sciences (ETP)
The seventh in the series of ETP Symposia (see
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
2012,
26
, ...
Evolving benchmarking practices: a review for research perspectives
Evolving benchmarking practices: a review for research perspectives
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to review a major section of the literature on benchmarking practices in order to achieve better perspectives for emerging benchmarking research...
Perceptions about benchmarking best practices among French managers: an exploratory survey
Perceptions about benchmarking best practices among French managers: an exploratory survey
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to present a discussion on the most commonly accepted benchmarking norms in the USA, the lessons learned from benchmarking experiences and see h...
Improving SME logistics performance through benchmarking
Improving SME logistics performance through benchmarking
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the applicability of current benchmarking proposals for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and to suggest a condensed process...
Barriers to internal benchmarking initiatives: an empirical investigation
Barriers to internal benchmarking initiatives: an empirical investigation
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to focus on the identification of barriers to the implementation of benchmarking initiatives. Managers have little guidance on strategies for su...
An optimisational model of benchmarking
An optimisational model of benchmarking
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a quantitative methodology for benchmarking process which is simple, effective and efficient as a rejoinder to benchmarking detractor...
A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures
A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to redress the imbalances in the past literature of supply chain benchmarking and enhance data envelopment analysis (DEA) modeling approach in s...
Endothelial Protein C Receptor
Endothelial Protein C Receptor
IntroductionThe protein C anticoagulant pathway plays a critical role in the negative regulation of the blood clotting response. The pathway is triggered by thrombin, which allows ...

