Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of Electrocautery and Scalpel Incision in Midline Abdominal Surgery
View through CrossRef
Background: With the advancement of surgical techniques, the comparison of electrocautery and scalpel incisions in midline abdominal surgeries has become an essential area of study. Traditional scalpel incisions have been known for their precision but carry risks of excessive blood loss and sharp injuries. Electrocautery, offering a potentially safer and more efficient alternative, has been gaining attention in surgical practices.
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness, safety, and outcomes of electrocautery versus scalpel incisions in midline abdominal surgeries, with a focus on incision time, blood loss, wound infection, and postoperative pain.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, over 12 months from June 2021 to June 2022. A total of 150 patients, split evenly into electrocautery and scalpel groups, were evaluated. Patients aged 20-75 years, undergoing midline abdominal surgery, were included. The main parameters measured were incision time, blood loss, wound infection, and postoperative pain. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0, employing independent samples t-tests and chi-square tests.
Results: The electrocautery group exhibited a significantly shorter incision time (13.73 ± 2.45 seconds) compared to the scalpel group (18.67 ± 3.02 seconds, p < 0.001). Blood loss was also lower in the electrocautery group (11.47 ± 2.49 ml) than in the scalpel group (27.27 ± 4.13 ml, p < 0.001). Wound infection rates were 6.7% for electrocautery and 13.3% for scalpel, though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.174). Remarkably, 100% of the electrocautery group reported postoperative pain, in contrast to none in the scalpel group (p = 0.000).
Conclusion: The study concluded that electrocautery is more effective than scalpel incision in terms of incision time and blood loss, making it a preferable method for midline abdominal surgeries. However, the higher incidence of postoperative pain in the electrocautery group warrants further investigation.
Title: Comparison of Electrocautery and Scalpel Incision in Midline Abdominal Surgery
Description:
Background: With the advancement of surgical techniques, the comparison of electrocautery and scalpel incisions in midline abdominal surgeries has become an essential area of study.
Traditional scalpel incisions have been known for their precision but carry risks of excessive blood loss and sharp injuries.
Electrocautery, offering a potentially safer and more efficient alternative, has been gaining attention in surgical practices.
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness, safety, and outcomes of electrocautery versus scalpel incisions in midline abdominal surgeries, with a focus on incision time, blood loss, wound infection, and postoperative pain.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, over 12 months from June 2021 to June 2022.
A total of 150 patients, split evenly into electrocautery and scalpel groups, were evaluated.
Patients aged 20-75 years, undergoing midline abdominal surgery, were included.
The main parameters measured were incision time, blood loss, wound infection, and postoperative pain.
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.
0, employing independent samples t-tests and chi-square tests.
Results: The electrocautery group exhibited a significantly shorter incision time (13.
73 ± 2.
45 seconds) compared to the scalpel group (18.
67 ± 3.
02 seconds, p < 0.
001).
Blood loss was also lower in the electrocautery group (11.
47 ± 2.
49 ml) than in the scalpel group (27.
27 ± 4.
13 ml, p < 0.
001).
Wound infection rates were 6.
7% for electrocautery and 13.
3% for scalpel, though this was not statistically significant (p = 0.
174).
Remarkably, 100% of the electrocautery group reported postoperative pain, in contrast to none in the scalpel group (p = 0.
000).
Conclusion: The study concluded that electrocautery is more effective than scalpel incision in terms of incision time and blood loss, making it a preferable method for midline abdominal surgeries.
However, the higher incidence of postoperative pain in the electrocautery group warrants further investigation.
Related Results
Comparison Of Midline Abdominal Surgery Using Scalpel Versus Electrocautery Incision in Rural Indian Population
Comparison Of Midline Abdominal Surgery Using Scalpel Versus Electrocautery Incision in Rural Indian Population
The scalpel was considered a gold standard for making skin incisions until the inception of diathermy. Nowadays, electrodes used in making diathermy incisions generate a pure sinus...
Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach
Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach
Background:
Although the direct anterior approach (DAA) represents an intermuscular and internervous approach to total hip arthroplasty (THA), it did not reach global a...
SKIN INCISIONS WITH DIATHERMY AND SCALPEL IN ABDOMINAL SURGERY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.
SKIN INCISIONS WITH DIATHERMY AND SCALPEL IN ABDOMINAL SURGERY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY.
Skin incisions are made traditionally with scalpel. The cutting diathermy for making surgical incision has
met with scepticism because of possible excessive scarring, impaired woun...
Surgical site infection rates in scalp incisions for cranial surgeries; a comparison of scalpel and cutting electrocautery
Surgical site infection rates in scalp incisions for cranial surgeries; a comparison of scalpel and cutting electrocautery
Background: Traditionally, the scalpel, has been the device used to make incisions on the skin. It is
readily available, cheap and makes precise cuts on the skin. However, there ma...
Comparison between Scalpel Incision and Diathermy Incision in Elective Midline Abdominal Surgery
Comparison between Scalpel Incision and Diathermy Incision in Elective Midline Abdominal Surgery
Introduction: Midline abdominal surgeries also need an accurate approach toward appropriate incisions to ensure safer surgery and better results. The scalpel has been used in the p...
Changes in Tissue pH and Temperature after Incision Indicate Acidosis May Contribute to Postoperative Pain
Changes in Tissue pH and Temperature after Incision Indicate Acidosis May Contribute to Postoperative Pain
Background
Incisional pain is a common form of acute pain. Previously, the authors studied persistent pain behaviors caused by incisions, using animal models for postop...
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Atypical Sigmoid Volvulus in an Adolescent: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction
Sigmoid volvulus is an underrecognized diagnosis with potentially fatal outcomes in adolescents; the current study aims to present an adolescent with mild sym...
A Respective Observational Study of Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis Receiving Parathyroidectomy By Ultrasonic Scalpel
A Respective Observational Study of Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis Receiving Parathyroidectomy By Ultrasonic Scalpel
Abstract
Background
Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) remains a common complication in many patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Kidney Disease Improve Global Outcome...

