Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Endovascular Transvenous versus Open Femoropopliteal Bypass
View through CrossRef
Background and Objectives: Lower extremity arterial disease is one of the most prevalent manifestations of atherosclerosis. The results from numerous studies regarding the best revascularization method of an occluded superficial femoral artery have been conflicting. The aim of this study was to compare the patency of transvenous endovascular with open femoropopliteal bypass, both with vein and prosthetic grafts. To our knowledge, a direct patency comparison between transvenous endovascular and open femoropopliteal bypass has not been published. This could help elucidate which method is preferable and in which cases. Materials and Methods: Patients with complex TASC-C and D SFA lesions were offered endovascular transvenous or open bypass. A total of 384 consecutive patients with PAD requiring surgical treatment were evaluated for inclusion in this study. Three-year follow-up data were collected for 52 endovascular procedures, 80 prosthetic grafts, and 44 venous bypass surgeries. Bypass patency was investigated by Duplex US every 6 months. Kaplan–Meier plots were used to analyze primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency for endovascular transvenous, autovenous, and prosthetic bypasses. Results: Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency in venous group at 3 years was 70.5%, 77.3%, and 77.3%, respectively. In the endovascular transvenous group, primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency at 3 years was 46.2%, 69.2%, and 76.9%, respectively. The lowest patency rates at 3 years were noted in the prosthetic graft group with 22.5% primary, 26.6% primary-assisted, and 28.2% secondary patency. Conclusions: The saphenous vein is the best graft to perform in above-the-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Transvenous endovascular bypass is a viable option with comparable primary-assisted and secondary patency. Primary patency is substantially lower for endovascular transvenous compared to venous bypass. Patients treated with endovascular transvenous bypass will require a significant number of secondary procedures to provide optimal patency. Prosthetic grafts should only be used if no other option for bypass is available.
Title: Endovascular Transvenous versus Open Femoropopliteal Bypass
Description:
Background and Objectives: Lower extremity arterial disease is one of the most prevalent manifestations of atherosclerosis.
The results from numerous studies regarding the best revascularization method of an occluded superficial femoral artery have been conflicting.
The aim of this study was to compare the patency of transvenous endovascular with open femoropopliteal bypass, both with vein and prosthetic grafts.
To our knowledge, a direct patency comparison between transvenous endovascular and open femoropopliteal bypass has not been published.
This could help elucidate which method is preferable and in which cases.
Materials and Methods: Patients with complex TASC-C and D SFA lesions were offered endovascular transvenous or open bypass.
A total of 384 consecutive patients with PAD requiring surgical treatment were evaluated for inclusion in this study.
Three-year follow-up data were collected for 52 endovascular procedures, 80 prosthetic grafts, and 44 venous bypass surgeries.
Bypass patency was investigated by Duplex US every 6 months.
Kaplan–Meier plots were used to analyze primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency for endovascular transvenous, autovenous, and prosthetic bypasses.
Results: Primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency in venous group at 3 years was 70.
5%, 77.
3%, and 77.
3%, respectively.
In the endovascular transvenous group, primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency at 3 years was 46.
2%, 69.
2%, and 76.
9%, respectively.
The lowest patency rates at 3 years were noted in the prosthetic graft group with 22.
5% primary, 26.
6% primary-assisted, and 28.
2% secondary patency.
Conclusions: The saphenous vein is the best graft to perform in above-the-knee femoropopliteal bypass.
Transvenous endovascular bypass is a viable option with comparable primary-assisted and secondary patency.
Primary patency is substantially lower for endovascular transvenous compared to venous bypass.
Patients treated with endovascular transvenous bypass will require a significant number of secondary procedures to provide optimal patency.
Prosthetic grafts should only be used if no other option for bypass is available.
Related Results
Impact of calcification and infrapopliteal outflow on the outcome of endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease
Impact of calcification and infrapopliteal outflow on the outcome of endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease
Objectives In this paper, we report the long-term outcomes of the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease, focusing on the importance of calcification and runof...
Deciphering Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Patient Diversity: Insights From a Cluster Analysis of the POPART Registry
Deciphering Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Patient Diversity: Insights From a Cluster Analysis of the POPART Registry
Background
Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) are the most common peripheral aneurysm. However, due to its rarity, the cumulative body of evidence regarding patient patt...
Abstract 9276: Subcutaneous and Transvenous Defibrillator in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
Abstract 9276: Subcutaneous and Transvenous Defibrillator in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
Introduction:
There is limited evidence guiding the selection between subcutaneous and transvenous ICD in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy ...
By-Pass Pigging - A 'Simple' Technology with Significant Business Impact
By-Pass Pigging - A 'Simple' Technology with Significant Business Impact
Abstract
Bypass pigs are similar to normal pigs but have bypass ports to allow for a certain amount of fluid flow through. The bypass flow can "smooth out" the li...
Retrograde open mesenteric stenting and outcomes for acute mesenteric ischemia
Retrograde open mesenteric stenting and outcomes for acute mesenteric ischemia
Objectives
Data regarding retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS) for urgent mesenteric ischemia is limited to small single center and case series, with vari...
Endovascular biometrics and engineering
Endovascular biometrics and engineering
Aim. To study technical problems in the provision of endovascular care and to develop technological solutions for its improvement based on endovascular biometry.
Methods. For...
Endovascular versus open revascularization for acute arterial occlusive mesenteric ischemia: a retrospective single center analysis
Endovascular versus open revascularization for acute arterial occlusive mesenteric ischemia: a retrospective single center analysis
Abstract
Purpose
Acute arterial occlusive mesenteric ischemia (AAOMI) is a life-threatening emergency associated with hig...
Shockwave Lithoplasty versus 355-nm Laser for Vessel Preparation in Calcified Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: A Single-Center Comparative Study
Shockwave Lithoplasty versus 355-nm Laser for Vessel Preparation in Calcified Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: A Single-Center Comparative Study
Abstract
Comparative data on vessel preparation using intravascular Shockwave lithotripsy (Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) or the 355-nm Auryon laser (Ang...

