Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

PAN-AFRICANISM, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE AFRICAN UNION’S DILEMMA

View through CrossRef
Research Problem: Pan-Africanism has long served as the ideological foundation for Africa’s pursuit of unity, self-determination, and collective development. The establishment of the African Union (AU) in 2002 was intended to advance this vision beyond the sovereignty-centered limitations of the Organisation of African Unity. However, the enduring tension between Pan-African ideals and the strict defense of state sovereignty continues to undermine the African Union’s capacity to deliver on its integration agenda. The central problem lies in the reluctance of member states to cede authority to supranational institutions, thereby constraining the Union’s ability to act decisively in matters of peace, security, and economic cooperation. Methods/Theory: The study adopts a qualitative, analytical methodology. Content analysis is employed to evaluate the AU's sovereignty–integration dilemma. Similarly, the research employs intergovernmentalism and neo-functionalism as theoretical frameworks. Results: Results from the research study reveals that while sovereignty protection remains dominant, incremental integration in functional areas such as trade shows potential for positive spillovers. Conclusion: The study concludes that Pan-Africanism is hindered by sovereignty but not obsolete. Key Contribution to Knowledge:    This research contributes to debates on African integration by bridging theory and practice, highlighting how sovereignty paradoxes both constrain and create opportunities for gradual functional integration within the AU framework. Recommendation: The study It recommends reconceptualising sovereignty for collective action, strengthening AU institutions, deepening economic integration, amplifying Africa’s global voice, reinvigorating Pan-African identity through citizen participation, inclusive governance, visionary leadership, and enhanced regional solidarity to address contemporary challenges and harness Africa’s collective potential for sustainable development.
Title: PAN-AFRICANISM, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE AFRICAN UNION’S DILEMMA
Description:
Research Problem: Pan-Africanism has long served as the ideological foundation for Africa’s pursuit of unity, self-determination, and collective development.
The establishment of the African Union (AU) in 2002 was intended to advance this vision beyond the sovereignty-centered limitations of the Organisation of African Unity.
However, the enduring tension between Pan-African ideals and the strict defense of state sovereignty continues to undermine the African Union’s capacity to deliver on its integration agenda.
The central problem lies in the reluctance of member states to cede authority to supranational institutions, thereby constraining the Union’s ability to act decisively in matters of peace, security, and economic cooperation.
Methods/Theory: The study adopts a qualitative, analytical methodology.
Content analysis is employed to evaluate the AU's sovereignty–integration dilemma.
Similarly, the research employs intergovernmentalism and neo-functionalism as theoretical frameworks.
Results: Results from the research study reveals that while sovereignty protection remains dominant, incremental integration in functional areas such as trade shows potential for positive spillovers.
Conclusion: The study concludes that Pan-Africanism is hindered by sovereignty but not obsolete.
Key Contribution to Knowledge:    This research contributes to debates on African integration by bridging theory and practice, highlighting how sovereignty paradoxes both constrain and create opportunities for gradual functional integration within the AU framework.
Recommendation: The study It recommends reconceptualising sovereignty for collective action, strengthening AU institutions, deepening economic integration, amplifying Africa’s global voice, reinvigorating Pan-African identity through citizen participation, inclusive governance, visionary leadership, and enhanced regional solidarity to address contemporary challenges and harness Africa’s collective potential for sustainable development.

Related Results

BRINGING PAN-AFRICANISM BACK IN AS AN ANALYTICAL CATEGORY
BRINGING PAN-AFRICANISM BACK IN AS AN ANALYTICAL CATEGORY
Abstract This article advances Pan-Africanism as an analytical category for understanding African politics and global entanglements. It shows how recurring debate...
Pan-Africanism: A Quest for Liberation and the Pursuit of a United Africa
Pan-Africanism: A Quest for Liberation and the Pursuit of a United Africa
Our paper examines the place of Pan-Africanism as an educational, political, and cultural movement which had a lasting impact on the on the relationship between liberation and peop...
Pan-Africanism
Pan-Africanism
Pan-Africanism covers a wide range of intellectual positions which share the assumption of some common cultural or political projects for both Africans and people of African descen...
The Problem of "Popular" "Sovereignty"
The Problem of "Popular" "Sovereignty"
<p>“Popular sovereignty” is central to liberal democracy, but the concept of sovereignty—the right to rule and make the rules—has many difficulties and ambiguities that have ...
Pan-Africanism: A Quest for Liberation and the Pursuit of a United Africa
Pan-Africanism: A Quest for Liberation and the Pursuit of a United Africa
Our paper examines the place of Pan-Africanism as an educational, political, and cultural movement which had a lasting impact on the on the relationship between liberation and peop...
Rethinking the “international”: Contextualizing Pan-Africanism as an international relations theory in a changing global (dis)order
Rethinking the “international”: Contextualizing Pan-Africanism as an international relations theory in a changing global (dis)order
In this paper, we ask, to what extent can Pan-Africanism constitute a valid theory of international relations? Using a qualitative methodology and a critical analytical framework, ...
Panafricanism and Black Experiences: A Re-interpretation
Panafricanism and Black Experiences: A Re-interpretation
<p><span>The concept of Pan-Africanism sprung from the strong drive led by Black intellectuals and activists mostly based in the US and related Western corridors to end...
Al-Hajj Umar Taal or El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz (Malcolm X)? Case Studies on Islam and Interreligious Pan-African Unity
Al-Hajj Umar Taal or El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz (Malcolm X)? Case Studies on Islam and Interreligious Pan-African Unity
A comparison between the function of Islam in the lives of Al-Hajj Umar Taal and El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz (Malcolm X) suggests that Shabazz’s example of translating his Islamic obl...

Back to Top