Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Selective versus stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a randomised controlled trial from Egypt—an interim analysis
View through CrossRef
ObjectivesTo compare the success, survival and costs of selective versus stepwise carious tissue removal (SE/SW) in permanent teeth with deep (>2/3 dentine depth) carious lesions.DesignRandomised controlled, unicentre, clustered two-arm superiority trial.SettingOutpatient clinic of a private university in Cairo, Egypt.ParticipantsOne hundred and fifteen participants (n=132 teeth), aged 18–47 years, from Cairo, Egypt, were enrolled. Premolars/molars with occlusal/occlusal-proximal deep lesions (radiographically >2/3 dentine), sensible pulps, without spontaneous pain, were included.InterventionsPeripheral carious tissue removal to hard dentine was performed. Pulpo-proximally, soft dentine was left. A glass ionomer (GI) restoration was placed. After 3–4 months, teeth were randomly allocated to SE (n=66), with reduction of the GI into a base and no further tissue removal, followed by a composite resin restoration, or SW (n=66), with full removal of the GI, additional excavation until firm dentine pulpo-proximally, followed by a GI-based composite restoration. Mean follow-up was 1 year.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrimary outcome was success (absence of endodontic/restorative complications). Secondary outcomes were tooth survival and initial and total treatment costs.ResultsZero/five pulp exposures occurred during SE/SW, and seven/five SE/SW teeth required endodontic therapy. Success after 12 months was 89.4% for SE and 84.9% for SW. The estimated mean time free of complications was 23 and 18 months for SE and SW, respectively, without significant differences between SE and SW (p>0.05/Cox). Initial treatment costs were significantly higher for SW (mean (SD): 507.5 (123.4) Egyptian pounds (EGP)) than SE (mean (SD): 456.6 (98.3) EGP), while total costs showed no significant difference (p>0.05).ConclusionWithin the limitations of this interim analysis, and considering the depth of these lesions (>2/3 dentine), SE and SW showed similar risk of failure and overall costs after 1 year.Trial registration numberPACTR201603001396248.
Title: Selective versus stepwise removal of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a randomised controlled trial from Egypt—an interim analysis
Description:
ObjectivesTo compare the success, survival and costs of selective versus stepwise carious tissue removal (SE/SW) in permanent teeth with deep (>2/3 dentine depth) carious lesions.
DesignRandomised controlled, unicentre, clustered two-arm superiority trial.
SettingOutpatient clinic of a private university in Cairo, Egypt.
ParticipantsOne hundred and fifteen participants (n=132 teeth), aged 18–47 years, from Cairo, Egypt, were enrolled.
Premolars/molars with occlusal/occlusal-proximal deep lesions (radiographically >2/3 dentine), sensible pulps, without spontaneous pain, were included.
InterventionsPeripheral carious tissue removal to hard dentine was performed.
Pulpo-proximally, soft dentine was left.
A glass ionomer (GI) restoration was placed.
After 3–4 months, teeth were randomly allocated to SE (n=66), with reduction of the GI into a base and no further tissue removal, followed by a composite resin restoration, or SW (n=66), with full removal of the GI, additional excavation until firm dentine pulpo-proximally, followed by a GI-based composite restoration.
Mean follow-up was 1 year.
Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrimary outcome was success (absence of endodontic/restorative complications).
Secondary outcomes were tooth survival and initial and total treatment costs.
ResultsZero/five pulp exposures occurred during SE/SW, and seven/five SE/SW teeth required endodontic therapy.
Success after 12 months was 89.
4% for SE and 84.
9% for SW.
The estimated mean time free of complications was 23 and 18 months for SE and SW, respectively, without significant differences between SE and SW (p>0.
05/Cox).
Initial treatment costs were significantly higher for SW (mean (SD): 507.
5 (123.
4) Egyptian pounds (EGP)) than SE (mean (SD): 456.
6 (98.
3) EGP), while total costs showed no significant difference (p>0.
05).
ConclusionWithin the limitations of this interim analysis, and considering the depth of these lesions (>2/3 dentine), SE and SW showed similar risk of failure and overall costs after 1 year.
Trial registration numberPACTR201603001396248.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Indirect Pulp Treatment for Deep Carious Lesions in Mature Permanent Teeth: A Preventive, Minimally Invasive Clinical Approach
Indirect Pulp Treatment for Deep Carious Lesions in Mature Permanent Teeth: A Preventive, Minimally Invasive Clinical Approach
Background: Indirect pulp treatment (IPT) is a conservative approach aimed at preserving pulp vitality in teeth with deep carious lesions. In adult patients, however, evidence comp...
Clinical conduct of dentists in the treatment of deep dental carious lesions
Clinical conduct of dentists in the treatment of deep dental carious lesions
Different techniques are employed to contain the carious process: non-invasive, microinvasive, and invasive, and with restorative needs. Thus, it is essential that dentists are dul...
CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF PULPAL BLOOD PERFUSION IN TEETH
CONTEMPORARY TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF PULPAL BLOOD PERFUSION IN TEETH
Pulse oximetry (PO) and laser-Doppler fluxmetry (LDF) can be used for a determination of tooth vitality by measuring the pulpal blood perfusion. They offer an alternative to conven...
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
<p dir="ltr">Randomised trials are regarded as the gold standard in evaluating the effectiveness and safety of medical interventions, but they are not always feasible due to ...
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
Benchmarking observational studies against randomised trials
<p dir="ltr">Randomised trials are regarded as the gold standard in evaluating the effectiveness and safety of medical interventions, but they are not always feasible due to ...

