Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Effects of Learnability and Reward Responsiveness on Reward Processing
View through CrossRef
Abstract
For methodological reasons, reward processing is commonly studied using random feedback and unlearnable tasks. It remains unclear whether task learnability influences reward-related brain activity, and whether this effect depends on individual differences such as reward responsiveness. We addressed this question by administering a behavioural activation system (BAS) scale before recording electroencephalography (EEG) while participants completed learnable and unlearnable versions of the “doors” task, a standard two-choice paradigm. Despite matched outcome likelihoods across conditions, participants reported greater motivation, enjoyment, and perceived performance in the learnable task. Contrary to our predictions, the amplitude of the reward positivity (RewP) – a frontocentral ERP index of reward processing – did not depend on task learnability and reward responsiveness. However, learnability and reward responsiveness effects became apparent when the analysis was restricted to high performers. Within this subgroup, participants low in reward responsiveness showed an enhanced RewP when the task was learnable. These findings suggest that contextual factors such as task learnability can interact with individual differences, informing ongoing efforts to identify the RewP as a biomarker of disordered reward processing.
Title: The Effects of Learnability and Reward Responsiveness on Reward Processing
Description:
Abstract
For methodological reasons, reward processing is commonly studied using random feedback and unlearnable tasks.
It remains unclear whether task learnability influences reward-related brain activity, and whether this effect depends on individual differences such as reward responsiveness.
We addressed this question by administering a behavioural activation system (BAS) scale before recording electroencephalography (EEG) while participants completed learnable and unlearnable versions of the “doors” task, a standard two-choice paradigm.
Despite matched outcome likelihoods across conditions, participants reported greater motivation, enjoyment, and perceived performance in the learnable task.
Contrary to our predictions, the amplitude of the reward positivity (RewP) – a frontocentral ERP index of reward processing – did not depend on task learnability and reward responsiveness.
However, learnability and reward responsiveness effects became apparent when the analysis was restricted to high performers.
Within this subgroup, participants low in reward responsiveness showed an enhanced RewP when the task was learnable.
These findings suggest that contextual factors such as task learnability can interact with individual differences, informing ongoing efforts to identify the RewP as a biomarker of disordered reward processing.
Related Results
Learnability
Learnability
Learnability is not exactly a new concept in information technology, nor in cognitive science. Learnability has been a key concept of usability (Folmer & Bosch, 2004) in the ar...
An examination of how reward associations differentially facilitate and impair Stroop performance
An examination of how reward associations differentially facilitate and impair Stroop performance
Behavioral performance is improved when the color of a Stroop stimulus is tied to a potential reward but is impaired when the irrelevant word meaning is reward related. The facilit...
An examination of how reward associations facilitate and impair Stroop performance
An examination of how reward associations facilitate and impair Stroop performance
Rewarded stimuli are prioritized by the attentional system. Behavioral performance is improved when the task-relevant dimension is tied to a potential reward but is impaired when t...
Reward does not facilitate visual perceptual learning until sleep occurs
Reward does not facilitate visual perceptual learning until sleep occurs
ABSTRACTA growing body of evidence indicates that visual perceptual learning (VPL) is enhanced by reward provided during training. Another line of studies has shown that sleep foll...
Learnability in Automated Driving (LiAD): Concepts for Applying Learnability Engineering (CALE) Based on Long-Term Learning Effects
Learnability in Automated Driving (LiAD): Concepts for Applying Learnability Engineering (CALE) Based on Long-Term Learning Effects
Learnability in Automated Driving (LiAD) is a neglected research topic, especially when considering the unpredictable and intricate ways humans learn to interact and use automated ...
Differential and temporally dynamic involvement of primate amygdala nuclei in face animacy and reward information processing
Differential and temporally dynamic involvement of primate amygdala nuclei in face animacy and reward information processing
Abstract
Decision-making is influenced by both expected reward and social factors, such as who offered the outcomes. Thus, although a reward might originally be ind...
Automatic Responsiveness Testing in Epilepsy with Wearable Technology: The ARTiE Watch
Automatic Responsiveness Testing in Epilepsy with Wearable Technology: The ARTiE Watch
AbstractObjectiveAn accurate evaluation of behavioral responsiveness during and after seizures in people with epilepsy is critical for accurate diagnosis and management. Current me...
Explicit reward stabilizes motor output by attenuating sensory prediction error driven learning
Explicit reward stabilizes motor output by attenuating sensory prediction error driven learning
ABSTRACT
Motor adaptation driven by sensory prediction errors (SPEs) is often regarded as an automatic, implicit process that operates independen...

