Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey on Its Impact on Economic Growth and Its Challenges

View through CrossRef
Advocates of decentralization contend that it is a fundamental catalyst for economic progress, as it bolsters the operational capacities of local governments, hence augmenting efficiency and fostering competition. However, proponents of an opposing perspective contend that decentralization could potentially hinder economic progress through the inequitable allocation of resources, macroeconomic instability, and instances of corruption. The persistence of dispute has endured across several decades of rigorous theoretical and empirical examination. The majority of empirical research conducted in this field has focused on analyzing the impact of decentralization on economic growth in both developed and developing nations. Although there is a lack of consistent findings, a limited number of studies have focused on the obstacles and difficulties that may impede the effectiveness of decentralization in fostering economic growth and development. The comprehension of the role and challenges associated with decentralization is a vital consideration for policymakers, as it is recognized as a significant institutional element. Therefore, this study aims to conduct one of the initial surveys to synthesize the existing theoretical and empirical literature on decentralization. This study provides a concise review of the theoretical discourse around fiscal decentralization, examining both the arguments in favor of and against it to comprehend its potential effects on economic growth. This study presents empirical data on the relationship between fiscal decentralization and economic growth, where mixed findings were reported. Furthermore, we emphasize the persistent obstacles that hinder the progress of fiscal decentralization, namely in terms of fiscal autonomy, limited resources, political discord, and oversight by the central government. In conclusion, our research article provides a comprehensive analysis and offers a set of policy recommendations aimed at facilitating the attainment of effective decentralization.
Title: Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey on Its Impact on Economic Growth and Its Challenges
Description:
Advocates of decentralization contend that it is a fundamental catalyst for economic progress, as it bolsters the operational capacities of local governments, hence augmenting efficiency and fostering competition.
However, proponents of an opposing perspective contend that decentralization could potentially hinder economic progress through the inequitable allocation of resources, macroeconomic instability, and instances of corruption.
The persistence of dispute has endured across several decades of rigorous theoretical and empirical examination.
The majority of empirical research conducted in this field has focused on analyzing the impact of decentralization on economic growth in both developed and developing nations.
Although there is a lack of consistent findings, a limited number of studies have focused on the obstacles and difficulties that may impede the effectiveness of decentralization in fostering economic growth and development.
The comprehension of the role and challenges associated with decentralization is a vital consideration for policymakers, as it is recognized as a significant institutional element.
Therefore, this study aims to conduct one of the initial surveys to synthesize the existing theoretical and empirical literature on decentralization.
This study provides a concise review of the theoretical discourse around fiscal decentralization, examining both the arguments in favor of and against it to comprehend its potential effects on economic growth.
This study presents empirical data on the relationship between fiscal decentralization and economic growth, where mixed findings were reported.
Furthermore, we emphasize the persistent obstacles that hinder the progress of fiscal decentralization, namely in terms of fiscal autonomy, limited resources, political discord, and oversight by the central government.
In conclusion, our research article provides a comprehensive analysis and offers a set of policy recommendations aimed at facilitating the attainment of effective decentralization.

Related Results

Fiscal Decentralization and Gender Parity in Developing Asia
Fiscal Decentralization and Gender Parity in Developing Asia
The traditional fiscal decentralization theorem claims that decentralized government can provide the goods and services at local level more efficiently. However, empirically it is ...
DECENTRALIZATION IN UGANDA: DECONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATION MODEL
DECENTRALIZATION IN UGANDA: DECONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL FISCAL RELATION MODEL
Most countries that have adopted fiscal decentralization to improve governance and public sector performance have found that improving service delivery is the most appealing goal. ...
Fiscal powers of municipalities in Russia’s resource-rich regions and fixed capital investment
Fiscal powers of municipalities in Russia’s resource-rich regions and fixed capital investment
The article considers the nature and limits of the impact local fiscal decentralization exerts on private fixed capital investments in resource-rich Russia’s regions. The relevance...
Fiscal Decentralization, Public Health Expenditure and Public Health–Evidence From China
Fiscal Decentralization, Public Health Expenditure and Public Health–Evidence From China
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak and the launch of the “Healthy China 2030” strategy in 2019, public health has become a relevant topic of discussion both within and ou...
Fiscal decentralization: a review of theories, evidence, and policy implications
Fiscal decentralization: a review of theories, evidence, and policy implications
This study systematically reviewed theories, empirical evidence, and policy implications of fiscal decentralization through a comprehensive analysis of literature and case studies....
Environmental Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and Environmental Pollution: Evidence from China
Environmental Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and Environmental Pollution: Evidence from China
Environmental decentralization is an institutional factor that influences the effect of ecological environment governance. Based on panel data of provinces in China from 2008 to 20...
Relationship between fiscal deficits and unemployment in South Africa
Relationship between fiscal deficits and unemployment in South Africa
Orientation: Heterodox economic scholarship has challenged the neoclassical doctrine that fiscal deficit increases unemployment in the long-term.Research purpose: This article exam...
Revisiting the Linkages of Fiscal Decentralization and Labor Absorption: A Theoretical Perspective
Revisiting the Linkages of Fiscal Decentralization and Labor Absorption: A Theoretical Perspective
Fiscal decentralization is one of the main strategies in governance reform that aims to bring budget decision-making closer to local governments. In the context of regional economi...

Back to Top