Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Solar Flare Prediction

View through CrossRef
Abstract In this paper, we develop five machine learning models, neural network (NN), long short-term memory (LSTM), LSTM based on attention mechanism (LSTM-A), bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM), and BLSTMbased on attention mechanism (BLSTM-A), for predicting whether a flare event of ≥C class or ≥M class will occur within 24 hr. We use solar active region samples provided by the Space-weather Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager Active Region Patches data from May 2010 to September 2018. The samples are divided into four categories (No-flare, C, M, and X) and generate 10 separate data sets. Then, after training, validating, and testing our models, we compare the results with the true skill statistics (TSS) as the assessment metric. The main results are as follows. (1) The TSS scores of ≥C class are 0.5472±0.0809, 0.6425±0.0685, 0.6904±0.0575, 0.6681±0.0573 and 0.6833±0.0531 for NN, LSTM, BLSTM, LSTM-A, and BLSTM-A, respectively. The TSS scores of ≥M class are 0.5723±0.1139, 0.6579±0.0758, 0.5943±0.0712,0.6493±0.0826 and 0.5932±0.0723, respectively. (2) For the first time, we add an attention mechanism to BLSTM for flare prediction, which improves the performance of the model for ≥C class. (3) Among the five models, the prediction model based on deep learning algorithms is generally superior to the model based on the traditional machine learning algorithm. The performance of the LSTM models is comparable to that of the BLSTM models. In general, LSTM-A for ≥C class performs better than other models. In addition, We also discuss the influence of 10 features on LSTM-A, and we find that removing the least significant feature will result in better performance than using all 10 features together, and the TSS score of the model will improve to 0.7059 ± 0.0440.
Title: Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Solar Flare Prediction
Description:
Abstract In this paper, we develop five machine learning models, neural network (NN), long short-term memory (LSTM), LSTM based on attention mechanism (LSTM-A), bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM), and BLSTMbased on attention mechanism (BLSTM-A), for predicting whether a flare event of ≥C class or ≥M class will occur within 24 hr.
We use solar active region samples provided by the Space-weather Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager Active Region Patches data from May 2010 to September 2018.
The samples are divided into four categories (No-flare, C, M, and X) and generate 10 separate data sets.
Then, after training, validating, and testing our models, we compare the results with the true skill statistics (TSS) as the assessment metric.
The main results are as follows.
(1) The TSS scores of ≥C class are 0.
5472±0.
0809, 0.
6425±0.
0685, 0.
6904±0.
0575, 0.
6681±0.
0573 and 0.
6833±0.
0531 for NN, LSTM, BLSTM, LSTM-A, and BLSTM-A, respectively.
The TSS scores of ≥M class are 0.
5723±0.
1139, 0.
6579±0.
0758, 0.
5943±0.
0712,0.
6493±0.
0826 and 0.
5932±0.
0723, respectively.
(2) For the first time, we add an attention mechanism to BLSTM for flare prediction, which improves the performance of the model for ≥C class.
(3) Among the five models, the prediction model based on deep learning algorithms is generally superior to the model based on the traditional machine learning algorithm.
The performance of the LSTM models is comparable to that of the BLSTM models.
In general, LSTM-A for ≥C class performs better than other models.
In addition, We also discuss the influence of 10 features on LSTM-A, and we find that removing the least significant feature will result in better performance than using all 10 features together, and the TSS score of the model will improve to 0.
7059 ± 0.
0440.

Related Results

The impact of moderate solar flare activity on ionospheric response from august 5th to 7th, 2023
The impact of moderate solar flare activity on ionospheric response from august 5th to 7th, 2023
This study investigates the ionospheric response to a period of heightened solar flare activity from August 5th to August 7th, 2023, by analysing ground-based observations of vario...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Major Greehouse Gas Reduction from Flare Verification
Major Greehouse Gas Reduction from Flare Verification
Abstract Membranes are utilized in Acid Gas Removal System (AGRS) at offshore platform to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from sour gas reservoirs. CO2 selectively perme...
Solar Trackers Using Six-Bar Linkages
Solar Trackers Using Six-Bar Linkages
Abstract A solar panel faces the sun or has the solar ray normal to its face to enhance power reaping. A fixed solar panel can only meet this condition at one moment...
Hydroxychloroquine blood levels predicts flare in childhood-onset lupus nephritis
Hydroxychloroquine blood levels predicts flare in childhood-onset lupus nephritis
Objective Low hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blood levels are predictors of flare in adult lupus. Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) has high morbidity with renal involv...
Predictions of the solar wind speed by the probability distribution function model
Predictions of the solar wind speed by the probability distribution function model
AbstractThe near‐Earth space environment is strongly driven by the solar wind and interplanetary magnetic field. This study presents a model for predicting the solar wind speed up ...
Drifting of the line-tied footpoints of CME flux-ropes
Drifting of the line-tied footpoints of CME flux-ropes
Context. Bridging the gap between heliospheric and solar observations of eruptions requires the mapping of interplanetary coronal mass ejection (CME) footpoints down to the Sun’s s...

Back to Top