Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A COMPARISON OF NEBULIZED AND INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE FOR REDUCING BLOOD PRESSURE CHANGES DURING LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION.
View through CrossRef
Background: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation often lead to temporary increases in blood pressure and heart rate due to the activation of
the sympatho-adrenal system. Patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular illnesses may have a sudden hemodynamic reaction, which may
have harmful consequences such as myocardial ischemia or infarction, arrhythmias, cardiac failure, increased intracranial pressure, and cerebral
hemorrhage. Aim: A comparison of nebulized and intravenous lidocaine for reducing blood pressure changes during laryngoscopy and
endotracheal intubation Materials and method: Aprospective randomized study was done in the Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care at
K. D. Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Mathura, from June 2023 to Jan 2024. Ninety patients undergoing surgeries under general
anesthesia were divided into two groups. Patients of group IVL (n=45) received 2% Lignocaine 1.5mg/kg diluted in 10ml Normal saline by slow
intravenous route 90 seconds before induction, and patients of group NL (n=45) received 4ml, 4% lignocaine as nebulization 10min before
induction.Results: In Group NL, the baseline heart rate (HR) was 87.04 bpm, increasing to 112.47 bpm two minutes post-intubation, indicating a
rise of 25.43 bpm. In the IVL group, the baseline HR for this group was 87.63 bpm, with a subsequent increase to 100.02 bpm two minutes postintubation, reecting a rise of 12.39 bpm.In the NL group, nebulized lignocaine signicantly increased systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean
arterial pressure (MAP) by notable values as compared with the IVL group. Conclusion: Our conclusion is that the administration of lignocaine
effectively mitigates the uctuations in heart rate and blood pressure induced by laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Notably, the
intravenous delivery of lignocaine demonstrates superior suppressive properties when compared to lignocaine nebulization.
Title: A COMPARISON OF NEBULIZED AND INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE FOR REDUCING BLOOD PRESSURE CHANGES DURING LARYNGOSCOPY AND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION.
Description:
Background: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation often lead to temporary increases in blood pressure and heart rate due to the activation of
the sympatho-adrenal system.
Patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular illnesses may have a sudden hemodynamic reaction, which may
have harmful consequences such as myocardial ischemia or infarction, arrhythmias, cardiac failure, increased intracranial pressure, and cerebral
hemorrhage.
Aim: A comparison of nebulized and intravenous lidocaine for reducing blood pressure changes during laryngoscopy and
endotracheal intubation Materials and method: Aprospective randomized study was done in the Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care at
K.
D.
Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Mathura, from June 2023 to Jan 2024.
Ninety patients undergoing surgeries under general
anesthesia were divided into two groups.
Patients of group IVL (n=45) received 2% Lignocaine 1.
5mg/kg diluted in 10ml Normal saline by slow
intravenous route 90 seconds before induction, and patients of group NL (n=45) received 4ml, 4% lignocaine as nebulization 10min before
induction.
Results: In Group NL, the baseline heart rate (HR) was 87.
04 bpm, increasing to 112.
47 bpm two minutes post-intubation, indicating a
rise of 25.
43 bpm.
In the IVL group, the baseline HR for this group was 87.
63 bpm, with a subsequent increase to 100.
02 bpm two minutes postintubation, reecting a rise of 12.
39 bpm.
In the NL group, nebulized lignocaine signicantly increased systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean
arterial pressure (MAP) by notable values as compared with the IVL group.
Conclusion: Our conclusion is that the administration of lignocaine
effectively mitigates the uctuations in heart rate and blood pressure induced by laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.
Notably, the
intravenous delivery of lignocaine demonstrates superior suppressive properties when compared to lignocaine nebulization.
Related Results
Comparison of intravenous fentanyl versus lidocaine for attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery in Dilla University Referral Hospital, Ethiopia, a randomized controlled trial
Comparison of intravenous fentanyl versus lidocaine for attenuation of hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery in Dilla University Referral Hospital, Ethiopia, a randomized controlled trial
Background:
Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation is one of the most stressing moments in technique of general anesthesia. It can cause pressure response and sympato...
Comparison of hemodynamic effects of intravenous labetalol plus intravenous fentanyl and intravenous fentanyl alone for attenuating reflex responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
Comparison of hemodynamic effects of intravenous labetalol plus intravenous fentanyl and intravenous fentanyl alone for attenuating reflex responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: A prospective randomized controlled trial
Background: Laryngoscopy is an essential part of endotracheal intubation. Direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are a noxious stimulation that causes significant stress respo...
Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Novices: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in Novices: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Intubating the trachea is a challenging task, especially for novice intubators. Successful intubation, in the shortest possible time, prevents hypoxia and hemodynamic disturbances....
Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: Propacetamol versus Lidocaine—A Randomized Clinical Trial
Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: Propacetamol versus Lidocaine—A Randomized Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of propacetamol on attenuating hemodynamic responses subsequent laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation compared to lidocaine. In th...
Learning endotracheal intubation with the Video Endotracheal Tube Guide
Learning endotracheal intubation with the Video Endotracheal Tube Guide
Introduction Video laryngoscopes facilitate the visualization of the glottis but do not guarantee endotracheal intubation due to difficulties in guiding the endotracheal tube to t...
Learning endotracheal intubation with the Video Endotracheal Tube Guide
Learning endotracheal intubation with the Video Endotracheal Tube Guide
Introduction Video laryngoscopes facilitate the visualization of the glottis but do not guarantee endotracheal intubation due to difficulties in guiding the endotracheal tube to t...
Efficacy of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Blood Pressure to Laryngoscopy in Controlled Hypertensive Patient: A Randomized Control Trial
Efficacy of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Blood Pressure to Laryngoscopy in Controlled Hypertensive Patient: A Randomized Control Trial
Control of blood pressure during anesthesia is very crucial. Laryngoscopic manipulation and endotracheal intubation are always a matter of concern which capable of producing tachyc...
<b>A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparative Study of Pre-Operative Nebulized Dexamethasone and Intravenous Ketorolac Tromethamine for the Prevention of Post-Operative Sore Throat Following General Anesthesia</b>
<b>A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparative Study of Pre-Operative Nebulized Dexamethasone and Intravenous Ketorolac Tromethamine for the Prevention of Post-Operative Sore Throat Following General Anesthesia</b>
Background: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common complication following endotracheal intubation during general anesthesia, affecting approximately 30–70% of surgical patien...

