Patient understanding and impression of hematology/oncology fellows.

9 Background: Hematologists/oncologists spend years training in a fellowship program. At academic centers, patients receiving treatment are often seen by fellows. It has not been established what patients understand about fellowship training, therefore our purpose was to explore their understanding and if they are content with fellows taking part in their care. Methods: At West Virginia University/Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center we drafted a survey. This anonymous and voluntary survey abstracted patient data that included: age, sex, race, level of education, type of cancer diagnosis, amount of time being treated for cancer, experience being cared for by fellows and basic knowledge of a hematology/oncology fellowship. Multiple-choice questions were drafted with 4 to 6 answer choices with no option for unknown. Surveys were collected over a three-week period from July 3, 2012 through July 24, 2012. Patients were surveyed at outpatient appointments, infusion center visits, and laboratory draws. Results: 226 surveys were collected. Statistical analysis was performed and a binomial regression was fit to the data. There is evidence that higher levels of education are more likely to give correct answers (p value 0.035). Patients who stated they had not seen a fellow or were unsure they had seen a fellow were more likely to select incorrect answers (p value 0.001). There is no statistical significance differentiating between cancer types in likelihood of getting answers correct (Table). 1.77% of those surveyed felt they completely understand the role of a fellow in their care, while 84.51% desired further information about fellows. Only 2.21% disliked having a fellow involved in their care. Conclusions: Patients at academic centers being seen by hematology/oncology fellows appear to have a lack of knowledge of a fellow’s role and background but have a desire to be educated. Educational initiatives can be introduced to teaching institutions to help patients better understand the role of a fellow. [Table: see text]