Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Shore-angling catches in the Tsitsikamma National Park, 1989-1995
View through CrossRef
Catch card returns completed by visitors and locals angling in the fishing area of the Tsitsikamma National Park between 1991 and 1995, as well as results of scientific fishing in the whole park between 1989 and 1991 were analysed. Species composition, catch per unit effort (cpue) and seasonality were determined. Seventy-six percent of the 1 147 catch cards suitable for analysis were submitted by visiting anglers, who caught a total of 1 638 fish weighing approximately 1 522 kg during 4 654 angler-hours. This was almost double the 948 fish, weighing about 611 kg, landed during 1 863 angler-hours by local anglers. A total of 709 fish weighing 774 kg was recorded during the 461 scientific fishing angler- hours. The mean annual cpue of visitors was lower than that of locals (35 @ 1 SE vs. 55 @ 3 SE fish/I 00 angler-hours), while the cpue recorded during the sci- entific fishing throughout the park was 154 fish/100 angler-hours. Species most frequently caught by visitors were Sarpa salpa (22.6 ), Amblyrhynchotes honckenii (19.6 ) and Diplodus sargus capensis (6.7 ), while the catches of locals were dominated by S. salpa (36.7 ), Boopsoidea inornata (21.8 ) and Pomatomus saltatrix (10.4 ). Outside the open fishing area scientific catches were dominated by D. sargus capensis (20 ), Cheimerius nufar (13 ), Pachymetopon grande (9 ) and Dichistius capensis (6 ). Fewer than 2.5 of the bony fish caught in the fishing area weighed more than 3 kg. Catch rates of most species varied seasonally, with the overall cpue of both visitors and locals peaking between October and April. The cpue in the fishing area of the park was at least 2.5 times lower than that recorded in the De Hoop Nature Reserve and Terrace Bay in the Skeleton Coast National Park. However, the cpue recorded during scientific fishing throughout the Tsitsikamma National Park compared favourably with that recorded in other protected areas.
Title: Shore-angling catches in the Tsitsikamma National Park, 1989-1995
Description:
Catch card returns completed by visitors and locals angling in the fishing area of the Tsitsikamma National Park between 1991 and 1995, as well as results of scientific fishing in the whole park between 1989 and 1991 were analysed.
Species composition, catch per unit effort (cpue) and seasonality were determined.
Seventy-six percent of the 1 147 catch cards suitable for analysis were submitted by visiting anglers, who caught a total of 1 638 fish weighing approximately 1 522 kg during 4 654 angler-hours.
This was almost double the 948 fish, weighing about 611 kg, landed during 1 863 angler-hours by local anglers.
A total of 709 fish weighing 774 kg was recorded during the 461 scientific fishing angler- hours.
The mean annual cpue of visitors was lower than that of locals (35 @ 1 SE vs.
55 @ 3 SE fish/I 00 angler-hours), while the cpue recorded during the sci- entific fishing throughout the park was 154 fish/100 angler-hours.
Species most frequently caught by visitors were Sarpa salpa (22.
6 ), Amblyrhynchotes honckenii (19.
6 ) and Diplodus sargus capensis (6.
7 ), while the catches of locals were dominated by S.
salpa (36.
7 ), Boopsoidea inornata (21.
8 ) and Pomatomus saltatrix (10.
4 ).
Outside the open fishing area scientific catches were dominated by D.
sargus capensis (20 ), Cheimerius nufar (13 ), Pachymetopon grande (9 ) and Dichistius capensis (6 ).
Fewer than 2.
5 of the bony fish caught in the fishing area weighed more than 3 kg.
Catch rates of most species varied seasonally, with the overall cpue of both visitors and locals peaking between October and April.
The cpue in the fishing area of the park was at least 2.
5 times lower than that recorded in the De Hoop Nature Reserve and Terrace Bay in the Skeleton Coast National Park.
However, the cpue recorded during scientific fishing throughout the Tsitsikamma National Park compared favourably with that recorded in other protected areas.
Related Results
Expenditure-based segmentation of visitors to the Tsitsikamma National Park
Expenditure-based segmentation of visitors to the Tsitsikamma National Park
Purpose and/or objectives: The purpose of this article is to apply expenditure-based segmentation to visitors at the Tsitsikamma National Park. The objective of the research is t...
Analisis SWOT Wisata di Kampung Pasir Angling Desa Suntenjaya
Analisis SWOT Wisata di Kampung Pasir Angling Desa Suntenjaya
Pasir Angling Village has tourism potential that can be developed as an agro-tourism destination in West Java, especially in the Lembang area. However, many tourist attractions in ...
Angling tourism: A state-of-the-art review
Angling tourism: A state-of-the-art review
This paper represents a scoping review of angling tourism. Using the Google Scholar search engine and Scopus search, the paper reviews 98 journal articles on angling tourism in ter...
The socio-economic impact of Africa’s oldest marine park
The socio-economic impact of Africa’s oldest marine park
South African National Parks (SANParks) plays a major role in the tourism industry and has three primary functions, namely to conserve biodiversity, to create tourism and recreatio...
Black Bass Diversity: Multidisciplinary Science for Conservation
Black Bass Diversity: Multidisciplinary Science for Conservation
<em>Abstract</em>.—Long-term studies in Ontario, Canada on Largemouth Bass <em>Micropterus salmoides</em> and Smallmouth Bass <em>M. dolomieu</em&g...
Also received
Also received
Bannikov, A.G. (ed.) 1983. Biological Bases for the Utilization and Conservation of Wild Animals.Breen, K.H. 1989. Photographing Waterfowl. Techniques for the Advanced Amateur and ...
Do Jaw Deformities Adversely Affect Largemouth Bass?
Do Jaw Deformities Adversely Affect Largemouth Bass?
Abstract
Largemouth Bass Micropterus nigricans anglers have mainly adopted catch-and-release practices with limited direct fishing mortality. However, catch-and-r...
Marine Catch Analysis For The Economy Of Coastal Communities
Marine Catch Analysis For The Economy Of Coastal Communities
Analysis of marine catches for the economy of coastal communities is an important thing to do. This is because marine catches are one of the main sources of livelihood for coastal ...

