Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness in early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis
View through CrossRef
Diseases of the biliary tree are prevalent in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and can have significant implications in terms of morbidity and mortality. Among these diseases, acute cholecystitis holds particular importance as it requires immediate attention and mandates timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a safe and effective procedure for managing acute cholecystitis, providing definitive treatment during the initial hospital stay and it is considered a superior option compared to delayed LC for the treatment of acute cholecystitis. The objective of the study was to examine the overall expenses incurred by hospitals and the duration of hospitalization concerning delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis. Materials and methods: An analytical (case-control) study was conducted involving 139 patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis and admitted to the University Clinic for Digestive Surgery. Among them, 71 patients were assigned to the study group, while 68 patients were placed in the control group. Patients in the study group received early LC treatment within 0-7 days from the onset of symptoms, while patients in the control group underwent delayed LC treatment between 6-12 weeks from symptom onset. The selection of patients was made using a simple random selection method, following predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Among patients from both groups, there was no statistically significant distinction in age, gender, education, place of residence, past illnesses, comorbidity, and previous abdominal surgery for p>0.05. However, a notable dissimilarity existed between the groups regarding total costs, with significantly higher expenses observed during delayed treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis (t-test for independent samples=-37.644 df=137 p=0.0001). Conclusion: Significant variations were observed in total hospital length of stay and hospital costs between the two groups, indicating that laparoscopic treatment for acute cholecystitis was associated with higher expenses and longer hospital stays.
Scientific Foundation Spiroski (publications)
Title: Economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness in early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis
Description:
Diseases of the biliary tree are prevalent in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and can have significant implications in terms of morbidity and mortality.
Among these diseases, acute cholecystitis holds particular importance as it requires immediate attention and mandates timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment.
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a safe and effective procedure for managing acute cholecystitis, providing definitive treatment during the initial hospital stay and it is considered a superior option compared to delayed LC for the treatment of acute cholecystitis.
The objective of the study was to examine the overall expenses incurred by hospitals and the duration of hospitalization concerning delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis.
Materials and methods: An analytical (case-control) study was conducted involving 139 patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis and admitted to the University Clinic for Digestive Surgery.
Among them, 71 patients were assigned to the study group, while 68 patients were placed in the control group.
Patients in the study group received early LC treatment within 0-7 days from the onset of symptoms, while patients in the control group underwent delayed LC treatment between 6-12 weeks from symptom onset.
The selection of patients was made using a simple random selection method, following predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Results: Among patients from both groups, there was no statistically significant distinction in age, gender, education, place of residence, past illnesses, comorbidity, and previous abdominal surgery for p>0.
05.
However, a notable dissimilarity existed between the groups regarding total costs, with significantly higher expenses observed during delayed treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis (t-test for independent samples=-37.
644 df=137 p=0.
0001).
Conclusion: Significant variations were observed in total hospital length of stay and hospital costs between the two groups, indicating that laparoscopic treatment for acute cholecystitis was associated with higher expenses and longer hospital stays.
Related Results
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Comparison of Postoperative Complications Early Vs Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis
Background: Acute cholecystitis, which is typically associated with gallstones, is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen presenting in emergency departments around the wor...
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
The difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a narrative review
Abstract
Background/purpose
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed general surgical procedures. Difficult laparoscopi...
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: EVALUATING THE SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY OF 24/7 LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR VARIED GRADES OF CHOLECYSTITIS, SPANNING FROM MILD TO GANGRENOUS
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: EVALUATING THE SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY OF 24/7 LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR VARIED GRADES OF CHOLECYSTITIS, SPANNING FROM MILD TO GANGRENOUS
Background: Acute cholecystitis is an extremely common surgical emergency, with gallbladder inflammation from mild to gangrenous forms. Early surgical intervention, often laparosco...
Outcome of Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Calculus Cholecystitis
Outcome of Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Calculus Cholecystitis
Background: The timing of cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis has been debated with most studies favoring early cholecystectomy. However, most surgeons in Bangladesh prefer to ...
Outcomes of patients presenting with Cholecystitis in terms of Early vs Delayed Cholecystectomy
Outcomes of patients presenting with Cholecystitis in terms of Early vs Delayed Cholecystectomy
Introduction: Biliary tract diseases comprise the most frequently occurring pathology in the abdomen, among which cholelithiasis affects 10-15% of the population. Early laparoscop...
Assessment of the risk for cholecystitis when performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a retrospective cohort study
Assessment of the risk for cholecystitis when performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a retrospective cohort study
Background/Aim: Acute cholecystitis most often occurs as an acute exacerbation of chronic cholecystitis. In over 90% of patients, the primary factor in the development of acute cho...
Robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
Robotic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis
Abstract
Introduction:
Nowadays laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered as criterion standard for surgical treatment of acute calculous cholec...
COMPARISION BETWEEN EARLY AND DELAYED CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS
COMPARISION BETWEEN EARLY AND DELAYED CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS
Background: Acute biliary pancreatitis is a common surgical emergency requiring inpatient conservative management. Cholecystectomy is critical in preventing recurrent episodes and ...

