Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Indeterminate solitary vertebral lesions on planar scintigraphy

View through CrossRef
Summary Objective: This study aims to evaluate the added value of hybrid SPECT-CT in differential diagnosis of indeterminate solitary vertebral lesion (SVL) on planar scintigraphy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Sixty-three NSCLC patients with indeterminate “hot spot” SVL on planar scintigraphy were retrospectively included in this study. Pathological confirmation and followup by whole body scintigraphy and SPECT-CT were used as golden standard for the evaluation of diagnostic performance of planar scintigraphy, SPECT, and SPECT-CT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed and compared among the three imaging modalities. For subgroup analysis, the performance of each imaging modality in different NSCLC subgroups including age, gender, histology of primary tumor and nature, site and location of SVL were analyzed, respectively. The impact of SPECT-CT on the management of NSCLC patient with SVL was also analyzed. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of planar scintigraphy, SPECT, and SPECT-CT in differentiating SVL were 41.9 % and 81.2 %, 83.9 % and 71.9 %, and 90.3 % and 90.6 %, respectively. SPECT-CT performed significantly better than both planar scintigraphy (P < 0.0001) and SPECT (P = 0.0027). The sensitivity for planar scintigraphy in nonlytic SVL was significantly higher than in lytic SVL (88.5 % vs. 50.0 %, P = 0.0008). The sensitivity for the planar scintigraphy and SPECT-CT in dorsal SVL was significantly higher than in non-dorsal SVL (55.0 % vs. 18.2 %, P = 0.0029 and 100 % vs. 85.7 %, P = 0.0236, respectively). SPECT-CT had an impact on the clinical management of 52.6 % (20/38) of patients compared to planar scintigraphy and 23.6 % (9/38) of patients compared to SPECT. Conclusion: Compared to planar scintigraphy and SPECT, hybrid SPECT-CT shows excellent performance in differentiating indeterminate SVL in NSCLC patients, the application of which will significantly impact patient management.
Title: Indeterminate solitary vertebral lesions on planar scintigraphy
Description:
Summary Objective: This study aims to evaluate the added value of hybrid SPECT-CT in differential diagnosis of indeterminate solitary vertebral lesion (SVL) on planar scintigraphy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: Sixty-three NSCLC patients with indeterminate “hot spot” SVL on planar scintigraphy were retrospectively included in this study.
Pathological confirmation and followup by whole body scintigraphy and SPECT-CT were used as golden standard for the evaluation of diagnostic performance of planar scintigraphy, SPECT, and SPECT-CT.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed and compared among the three imaging modalities.
For subgroup analysis, the performance of each imaging modality in different NSCLC subgroups including age, gender, histology of primary tumor and nature, site and location of SVL were analyzed, respectively.
The impact of SPECT-CT on the management of NSCLC patient with SVL was also analyzed.
Results: The sensitivity and specificity of planar scintigraphy, SPECT, and SPECT-CT in differentiating SVL were 41.
9 % and 81.
2 %, 83.
9 % and 71.
9 %, and 90.
3 % and 90.
6 %, respectively.
SPECT-CT performed significantly better than both planar scintigraphy (P < 0.
0001) and SPECT (P = 0.
0027).
The sensitivity for planar scintigraphy in nonlytic SVL was significantly higher than in lytic SVL (88.
5 % vs.
50.
0 %, P = 0.
0008).
The sensitivity for the planar scintigraphy and SPECT-CT in dorsal SVL was significantly higher than in non-dorsal SVL (55.
0 % vs.
18.
2 %, P = 0.
0029 and 100 % vs.
85.
7 %, P = 0.
0236, respectively).
SPECT-CT had an impact on the clinical management of 52.
6 % (20/38) of patients compared to planar scintigraphy and 23.
6 % (9/38) of patients compared to SPECT.
Conclusion: Compared to planar scintigraphy and SPECT, hybrid SPECT-CT shows excellent performance in differentiating indeterminate SVL in NSCLC patients, the application of which will significantly impact patient management.

Related Results

Correlation analysis of osteoporosis and vertebral endplate defects using CT and MRI imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study
Correlation analysis of osteoporosis and vertebral endplate defects using CT and MRI imaging: a retrospective cross-sectional study
BackgroundOsteoporosis (OP) and vertebral endplate defects are important manifestations of vertebral degenerative changes that greatly affect the quality of life of elderly people....
Clinicopathological Features of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Single-center Cross-sectional Study
Clinicopathological Features of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Single-center Cross-sectional Study
Abstract Introduction Due to indeterminate cytology, Bethesda III is the most controversial category within the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. This study exam...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT imaging contribution in the diagnosis of patients with hyperparathyroidism
99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT imaging contribution in the diagnosis of patients with hyperparathyroidism
Introduction: Hyperparathyroidism is presented with increased parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion due to hyperfunctioning of one or more of the four parathyroid glands. Primary hyp...
Ultrasound diagnosis of non-mass MRI-detected lesions
Ultrasound diagnosis of non-mass MRI-detected lesions
AbstractMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected lesions are often category 2 or 3 lesions on initial ultrasound examination. In addition, in the case of new non-mass lesions dete...

Back to Top