Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The First Adam-Second Adam Typology in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria

View through CrossRef
Abstract Patristic scholars have commented on the early church’s common practice of drawing catechetical instructions from the creation account in Genesis. One of the recurring motifs in such discussions is the fathers’ use of the Adam-Christ typology with its soteriological and sacramental implications. The present study briefly explores this theme in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria with particular reference to the baptism of Jesus and the theological challenge it posed to the early church: Did Jesus the Lord receive the Spirit at his baptism? Why did he need to be baptized? What is the relationship between the baptism of Jesus and Christian baptism? Both Cyril and Chrysostom make insightful use of the Adamic typology in this context as they discuss how Christ’s work restores fallen humanity from corruption and death that followed Adam’s sin. First, the study examines how the aforementioned fathers from two distinct traditions view the baptism of Jesus in the recovery of God’s grace that was lost in Adam’s fall. Second, the study will demonstrate that both Chrysostom and Cyril had much in common in their understanding of the transforming grace and work of the Spirit in refashioning the believer into a new creation at baptism. And third, it will be shown that there was a consensus on soteriological and sacramental perspectives among the Alexandrians and the Antiochenes.
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Title: The First Adam-Second Adam Typology in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria
Description:
Abstract Patristic scholars have commented on the early church’s common practice of drawing catechetical instructions from the creation account in Genesis.
One of the recurring motifs in such discussions is the fathers’ use of the Adam-Christ typology with its soteriological and sacramental implications.
The present study briefly explores this theme in John Chrysostom and Cyril of Alexandria with particular reference to the baptism of Jesus and the theological challenge it posed to the early church: Did Jesus the Lord receive the Spirit at his baptism? Why did he need to be baptized? What is the relationship between the baptism of Jesus and Christian baptism? Both Cyril and Chrysostom make insightful use of the Adamic typology in this context as they discuss how Christ’s work restores fallen humanity from corruption and death that followed Adam’s sin.
First, the study examines how the aforementioned fathers from two distinct traditions view the baptism of Jesus in the recovery of God’s grace that was lost in Adam’s fall.
Second, the study will demonstrate that both Chrysostom and Cyril had much in common in their understanding of the transforming grace and work of the Spirit in refashioning the believer into a new creation at baptism.
And third, it will be shown that there was a consensus on soteriological and sacramental perspectives among the Alexandrians and the Antiochenes.

Related Results

The Gospel of John and Antiochene christology: The diverging paths of Theodore of Mopsuestia and John Chrysostom
The Gospel of John and Antiochene christology: The diverging paths of Theodore of Mopsuestia and John Chrysostom
AbstractThis article questions the value of the categories ‘the school of Antioch’ and ‘Antiochene christology’ on the basis of the significant theological differences between the ...
The Divine Plan of Salvation in Cyril
The Divine Plan of Salvation in Cyril
Abstract Traces Cyril’s narrative of salvation from the baptism of Jesus through his death and resurrection to his ascension and enthronement, in order to show that,...
John of Damascus Rewriting Cyril of Alexandria: The Neglected Source of Contra Nestorianos (CPG 8053)
John of Damascus Rewriting Cyril of Alexandria: The Neglected Source of Contra Nestorianos (CPG 8053)
This article revisits the relationship between John of Damascus’ two anti-Nestorian treatises, refuting the dominant view that Contra Nestorianos is a reworking of De fide contra N...
GENRE-PLOT TYPOLOGY OF INTERIOR DECORATIVE PAINTING IN CHINESE PAINTING OF THE BEGINNING OF THE 21ST CENTURY
GENRE-PLOT TYPOLOGY OF INTERIOR DECORATIVE PAINTING IN CHINESE PAINTING OF THE BEGINNING OF THE 21ST CENTURY
The article is devoted to Chinese decorative painting of the beginning of the 21st century. The purpose of the article is the genre-plot typology of the interior decorative paintin...
John Chrysostom on Almsgiving and the Use of Money
John Chrysostom on Almsgiving and the Use of Money
Few themes so dominate the homilies of John Chrysostom (ca. 347–407 CE) as the plight of the poor and the necessity of almsgiving. His picture of the poor, however, is always set a...
The Triumph of Pro-Nicene Theology over Anti-Monarchian Exegesis: Cyril of Alexandria and Theodore of Heraclea on John 14.10–11
The Triumph of Pro-Nicene Theology over Anti-Monarchian Exegesis: Cyril of Alexandria and Theodore of Heraclea on John 14.10–11
This article begins by identifying a previously unknown quotation in Cyril of Alexandria’s Commentary on the Gospel of John as an extract from the Johannine commentary of Theodore ...
John Chrysostom and African Charismatic Theology in Conversation
John Chrysostom and African Charismatic Theology in Conversation
This book puts John Chrysostom in conversation with deliverance ministries and the prosperity gospel in modern African charismatic Christianity. Samantha Miller argues that Chrysos...
John Chrysostom’s Discourse on Property Ownership: An Analysis from the Perspective of Roman Law
John Chrysostom’s Discourse on Property Ownership: An Analysis from the Perspective of Roman Law
Unlike the dominant but simplified view of previous scholarship that Chrysostom stands in opposition to Roman property law, his attitude towards Roman law concerning property owner...

Back to Top