Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Marxism

View through CrossRef
Marxism is a philosophical and practical framework for analyzing and changing society that was developed from the ideas of Karl Marx in the 19th century. He synthesized Hegelian philosophy, English political economy, and French socialist thought to develop a critical analysis of modern capitalism. As a major strategic thought system, Marxism appears variously in media studies: as a systematic investigation of capitalist media economies and societies, as a materialist approach to media objects and processes, and as a source of activist aesthetics. Thus, Marxist media analysis provides pragmatic examples ranging from the study of commercial media markets; state policies and institutions governing communication; critiques of the ideological intent and effect of films, television, and new media; polemics for political activist art and communication; and socially motivated aesthetic criticism of specific works. Crucially framed by its long association with leftist change ranging from labor activism and political insurrection to official state party control of nations and responses to repressive anti-Communism, Marxism almost always carries a weight of challenge to ideas of the “purely aesthetic,” the “neutral,” or “disinterested.” Because it is so wide reaching as an explanatory system, Marxism has influenced and underpinned various critical developments that may be openly antagonistic to other trends within Marxist media analysis broadly construed. In addition to sectarian division, Marxism often operates as a taken-for-granted background in some areas such as Latin American and European media study and a good part of cultural studies: so much so that its Marxist premises are often not openly stated. Also, a history of anti-Communism, especially during the Cold War, pushed many to hide the radical origins of their thought. Another important distinction concerns those who use Marxism to consider economic and institutional structures in media communications, often with a concern for democratic equality in the public sphere and thus a concern for news and information, journalism, state regulation and censorship, mass communications, advertising, and political discourse. A different and contrasting approach uses Marxism for historical, aesthetic, and cultural analysis of film, television, and media ranging from case studies of individual works to issues that run through a variety of forms, such as gender or race images or narratives. Reflecting disciplinary and departmental traditions, in the past these trends have often been antagonistic or blind to the other one in a social science versus arts and humanities contrast. But younger researchers often draw easily from both quantitative and qualitative models, feeling free to cross disciplines, synthesize methods, and actively deconstruct national, racial, ethnic, and gender boundaries in pursuit of understanding.
Title: Marxism
Description:
Marxism is a philosophical and practical framework for analyzing and changing society that was developed from the ideas of Karl Marx in the 19th century.
He synthesized Hegelian philosophy, English political economy, and French socialist thought to develop a critical analysis of modern capitalism.
As a major strategic thought system, Marxism appears variously in media studies: as a systematic investigation of capitalist media economies and societies, as a materialist approach to media objects and processes, and as a source of activist aesthetics.
Thus, Marxist media analysis provides pragmatic examples ranging from the study of commercial media markets; state policies and institutions governing communication; critiques of the ideological intent and effect of films, television, and new media; polemics for political activist art and communication; and socially motivated aesthetic criticism of specific works.
Crucially framed by its long association with leftist change ranging from labor activism and political insurrection to official state party control of nations and responses to repressive anti-Communism, Marxism almost always carries a weight of challenge to ideas of the “purely aesthetic,” the “neutral,” or “disinterested.
” Because it is so wide reaching as an explanatory system, Marxism has influenced and underpinned various critical developments that may be openly antagonistic to other trends within Marxist media analysis broadly construed.
In addition to sectarian division, Marxism often operates as a taken-for-granted background in some areas such as Latin American and European media study and a good part of cultural studies: so much so that its Marxist premises are often not openly stated.
Also, a history of anti-Communism, especially during the Cold War, pushed many to hide the radical origins of their thought.
Another important distinction concerns those who use Marxism to consider economic and institutional structures in media communications, often with a concern for democratic equality in the public sphere and thus a concern for news and information, journalism, state regulation and censorship, mass communications, advertising, and political discourse.
A different and contrasting approach uses Marxism for historical, aesthetic, and cultural analysis of film, television, and media ranging from case studies of individual works to issues that run through a variety of forms, such as gender or race images or narratives.
Reflecting disciplinary and departmental traditions, in the past these trends have often been antagonistic or blind to the other one in a social science versus arts and humanities contrast.
But younger researchers often draw easily from both quantitative and qualitative models, feeling free to cross disciplines, synthesize methods, and actively deconstruct national, racial, ethnic, and gender boundaries in pursuit of understanding.

Related Results

Marxism, Western
Marxism, Western
Western Marxism is used here as an umbrella term for the various schools of Marxist thought that have flourished in Western Europe since Marx’s death in 1883. It is sometimes used ...
The Reception and Criticism of Marxism in Russian Religious Philosophy (Late 19th – First Half of the 20th Century)
The Reception and Criticism of Marxism in Russian Religious Philosophy (Late 19th – First Half of the 20th Century)
At the end of the 19th century, Marxism was widely spread in Russia. Many Russian philosophers, including religious ones, among whom were N. Berdyaev, S. Bulgakov, P. Struve, S. Fr...
An Inquiry into Zhu Zhixin’s View of Marxism
An Inquiry into Zhu Zhixin’s View of Marxism
In the process of translating Marxist writings and gradually converting to Marxism, Zhu Zhixin formed his view of Marxism. Zhu Zhixin’s view of Marxism centered on the materialist ...
Marxist thought in Latin America
Marxist thought in Latin America
Marxism is a theory offering a critique of capitalist political economy. Marxism also views itself as an instrument or means of changing the world from a capitalist to a socialist ...
Spectres of Post-Marxism? Reassessing Key Post-Marxist Texts: A Reply to Stuart Sim
Spectres of Post-Marxism? Reassessing Key Post-Marxist Texts: A Reply to Stuart Sim
This reply to the chapter ‘Spectres of post-Marxism? Reassessing key post-Marxist texts’ focuses on two key moments that emerge from Stuart Sim’s argument: the identification of th...
An Exploration of the Sinicization of Marxism: The Unity of Theory and Practice
An Exploration of the Sinicization of Marxism: The Unity of Theory and Practice
The spread and practice of Marxism as a spiritual belief in China emphasizes its integration with traditional Chinese culture, adaptation to the changes in the stage of social deve...
Marxism and the City
Marxism and the City
AbstractDefeated in the East and discredited in the West, Marxism has broken down as an ideology and as a guide to governance. However, for all its flaws, it remains an important t...
Spectres of post-Marxism? Reassessing key post- Marxist texts: a reply to Stuart Sim
Spectres of post-Marxism? Reassessing key post- Marxist texts: a reply to Stuart Sim
This reply to the article ‘Spectres of post-Marxism? Reassessing key post-Marxist texts’ focuses on two key moments that emerge from Stuart Sim's argument: the identification of th...

Back to Top