Javascript must be enabled to continue!
An integrated approach to above- and below-ground ecological monitoring for nature-based solutions
View through CrossRef
1. As the development of nature-based solutions (NbS) increases globally, it is important to ensure that projects meet the objective of benefiting biodiversity, alongside tackling societal challenges. However, most NbS projects do not directly monitor ecological outcomes, and those that do often focus on a limited set of metrics. It is therefore challenging to assess whether projects fulfil the aim of benefiting biodiversity. 2. We aimed to identify the most informative and feasible ecological metrics, both above- and below-ground, for monitoring ecological outcomes of NbS. We conducted a structured non-systematic literature review to identify possible biodiversity and soil health metrics, then developed a scoring system to rank these based on their informativeness and feasibility for monitoring. 3. Metrics were categorised into compositional, structural, and functional aspects of biodiversity, and biological, physical, and chemical aspects of soil health. We grouped biodiversity and soil health metrics into Tier 1 (the most informative and feasible metrics), Tier 2 (informative metrics with some limitations in scope or feasibility), and Future metrics (highly informative metrics which are currently less feasible to monitor). Tier 1 metrics collectively address multiple aspects of biodiversity and soil health and are currently the highest priority for NbS projects to assess. For biodiversity nine Tier 1, six Tier 2, and 15 Future metrics were identified, and for soil health 11 Tier 1, six Tier 2, and five Future metrics. 4. We identified existing standardised methodologies for monitoring the proposed metrics, noting that for many metrics standardised methodologies are not available and threshold or reference values for each metric are missing. 5. Solution: Our study provides practitioners with a framework for selecting optimum metrics for assessing above- and below-ground ecological outcomes of NbS relevant to the place in which they are being implemented. A definition of each metric and standardised methodologies for collecting data are summarised, providing information to develop an ecological monitoring protocol for an NbS project. The information on each metric has been made freely available as a searchable database in an interactive online interface geared towards UK practitioners, but with wider applicability.
California Digital Library (CDL)
Title: An integrated approach to above- and below-ground ecological monitoring for nature-based solutions
Description:
1.
As the development of nature-based solutions (NbS) increases globally, it is important to ensure that projects meet the objective of benefiting biodiversity, alongside tackling societal challenges.
However, most NbS projects do not directly monitor ecological outcomes, and those that do often focus on a limited set of metrics.
It is therefore challenging to assess whether projects fulfil the aim of benefiting biodiversity.
2.
We aimed to identify the most informative and feasible ecological metrics, both above- and below-ground, for monitoring ecological outcomes of NbS.
We conducted a structured non-systematic literature review to identify possible biodiversity and soil health metrics, then developed a scoring system to rank these based on their informativeness and feasibility for monitoring.
3.
Metrics were categorised into compositional, structural, and functional aspects of biodiversity, and biological, physical, and chemical aspects of soil health.
We grouped biodiversity and soil health metrics into Tier 1 (the most informative and feasible metrics), Tier 2 (informative metrics with some limitations in scope or feasibility), and Future metrics (highly informative metrics which are currently less feasible to monitor).
Tier 1 metrics collectively address multiple aspects of biodiversity and soil health and are currently the highest priority for NbS projects to assess.
For biodiversity nine Tier 1, six Tier 2, and 15 Future metrics were identified, and for soil health 11 Tier 1, six Tier 2, and five Future metrics.
4.
We identified existing standardised methodologies for monitoring the proposed metrics, noting that for many metrics standardised methodologies are not available and threshold or reference values for each metric are missing.
5.
Solution: Our study provides practitioners with a framework for selecting optimum metrics for assessing above- and below-ground ecological outcomes of NbS relevant to the place in which they are being implemented.
A definition of each metric and standardised methodologies for collecting data are summarised, providing information to develop an ecological monitoring protocol for an NbS project.
The information on each metric has been made freely available as a searchable database in an interactive online interface geared towards UK practitioners, but with wider applicability.
Related Results
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...
Ground ice detection and implications for permafrost geomorphology
Ground ice detection and implications for permafrost geomorphology
Most permafrost contains ground ice, often as pore ice or thin veins or lenses of ice. In certain circumstance, larger bodies of ice can form, such as ice wedges, or massive lenses...
Study on the Ecological Carrying Capacity and Driving Factors of the Source Region of the Yellow River in China in the Past 30 Years
Study on the Ecological Carrying Capacity and Driving Factors of the Source Region of the Yellow River in China in the Past 30 Years
Abstract
Under the influence of natural factors and human activities, the ecological environment functions in the source region of the Yellow River in China have been degra...
Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Key Areas of Territorial Ecological Restoration in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Jiawang District, China
Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Key Areas of Territorial Ecological Restoration in Resource-Exhausted Cities: A Case Study of Jiawang District, China
Resource-exhausted cities usually face problems of environmental degradation, landscape fragmentation, and impeded ecological mobility. By clarifying the spatial heterogeneity of e...
Integrating Ecological Importance and Risk for Restoration Zoning and Ecological Water Demand in the Shiyang River Basin
Integrating Ecological Importance and Risk for Restoration Zoning and Ecological Water Demand in the Shiyang River Basin
Abstract
Effective ecological protection and restoration in arid inland river basins requires a holistic perspective of territorial spatial planning that balances conservat...
Realization and Prediction of Ecological Restoration Potential of Vegetation in Karst Areas
Realization and Prediction of Ecological Restoration Potential of Vegetation in Karst Areas
Based on the vegetation ecological quality index retrieved by satellite remote sensing in the karst areas of Guangxi in 2000–2019, the status of the ecological restoration of the v...
Study on Land Use in Towns from the Perspective of Ecological Security: a case study of Zhongtai Town, China
Study on Land Use in Towns from the Perspective of Ecological Security: a case study of Zhongtai Town, China
Abstract
Context
Maintaining regional ecological security is necessary to ensure sustainable human survival and development. Starting with the goal of ecological security,...
Performative Microforests
Performative Microforests
The design of office buildings can substantially improve the building, social, and ecological performance of office building projects. However, existing research on improving the p...

