Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Safety and Feasibility of AutoCaptureTM Pacing System in Patients undergoing LBBAP

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background The AutoCapture™ Pacing algorithm enhances safety and enables remote monitoring in conventional pacing; however, its application for permanent His bundle pacing has been limited. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel technique, and there is limited data on the application of the AutoCapture algorithm. Methods The prospective cohort at our University Hospital, South Korea, included all patients underwent LBBAP from 2022 to 2023. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether the AutoCapture algorithm was activated, with follow-ups every 3–6 months to evaluate clinical adverse events, including mortality, hospitalization, syncope, and loss of capture. Results A total of 97 patients (39 men, 75.2 ± 11.2 years) were divided into AutoCapture (n=47) and Manual (n=50) groups. R-wave amplitudes, pacing thresholds, and impedance values were similar between the groups. Over a 12 months period, LBBAP thresholds remained stable, and no adverse events were observed in the AutoCapture group. One patient in the Manual group experienced syncope due to capture loss caused by retraction of helix. Pacing output was significantly lower in the AutoCapture group (1.1 ± 0.3 vs. 2.00 ± 0.51, p < 0.001), enabling selective LBBAP. Conclusion The AutoCapture algorithm is safe and feasible for patients undergoing LBBAP, enabling lower pacing output and selective LBBAP.Scheme of the study protocol  Representative case
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Title: Safety and Feasibility of AutoCaptureTM Pacing System in Patients undergoing LBBAP
Description:
Abstract Background The AutoCapture™ Pacing algorithm enhances safety and enables remote monitoring in conventional pacing; however, its application for permanent His bundle pacing has been limited.
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel technique, and there is limited data on the application of the AutoCapture algorithm.
Methods The prospective cohort at our University Hospital, South Korea, included all patients underwent LBBAP from 2022 to 2023.
Patients were divided into two groups based on whether the AutoCapture algorithm was activated, with follow-ups every 3–6 months to evaluate clinical adverse events, including mortality, hospitalization, syncope, and loss of capture.
Results A total of 97 patients (39 men, 75.
2 ± 11.
2 years) were divided into AutoCapture (n=47) and Manual (n=50) groups.
R-wave amplitudes, pacing thresholds, and impedance values were similar between the groups.
Over a 12 months period, LBBAP thresholds remained stable, and no adverse events were observed in the AutoCapture group.
One patient in the Manual group experienced syncope due to capture loss caused by retraction of helix.
Pacing output was significantly lower in the AutoCapture group (1.
1 ± 0.
3 vs.
2.
00 ± 0.
51, p < 0.
001), enabling selective LBBAP.
Conclusion The AutoCapture algorithm is safe and feasible for patients undergoing LBBAP, enabling lower pacing output and selective LBBAP.
Scheme of the study protocol  Representative case.

Related Results

Comparison of Clinical Complications Between LBBAP and Traditional RVP in Long-Term Follow-Up
Comparison of Clinical Complications Between LBBAP and Traditional RVP in Long-Term Follow-Up
Background. Traditional right ventricular pacing (RVP) can lead to asynchronous cardiac mechanical contractions and increase the risk of adverse cardiac events. This study aimed to...
Efficacy of Closed Loop Stimulation in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
Efficacy of Closed Loop Stimulation in Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
Abstract Background: Closed-Loop Stimulation (CLS) adjusts pacing rate based on beat-to-beat impedance changes reflecting myoca...
e0650 The effects of biventricular synchronous pacing on CBF, MVO2 and CWE in dogs
e0650 The effects of biventricular synchronous pacing on CBF, MVO2 and CWE in dogs
Objective To compare the effects of biventricular synchronous pacing with different pacing site on coronary Blood flow (CBF), myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2)...
Conduction system pacing in a pediatric population: a case series
Conduction system pacing in a pediatric population: a case series
Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) offers physiological pacing with potential advantages over right ventricular (RV) pacing, particularly in child...
A Single Center Experience with Early Adoption of Physiologic Pacing Approaches
A Single Center Experience with Early Adoption of Physiologic Pacing Approaches
Background: Increasing interest in physiological pacing has been countered with challenges such as accurate lead deployment and increasing pacing thresholds with His-bundle pacing ...
Safety Assessment of Coronary Arteries During Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
Safety Assessment of Coronary Arteries During Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the location of implantation of the Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) electrode and the c...

Back to Top