Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer harboring KRAS p.G13D mutation treated with cetuximab.
View through CrossRef
448 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer patients with KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutated tumors are presently excluded from treatment with cetuximab (Cmab). On the other hand, a few patients who have mutated KRAS status occasionally respond to Cmab. The tumors of those patients predominantly had codon 13 mutation, and all codon 13 responder have mutation of p.G13D. We now compared the efficacy of Cmab among patients with p.G13D- mutant, other KRAS mutant and KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer. Methods: The patients from 9 Japanese institutions were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All patients were refractory to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and were treated with Cmab and irinotecan combination regimen. Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated respectively according to KRAS status. Results: Ninety four patients were treated with combination therapy. Among 94 cases, 7 cases were p.G13D-mutant KRAS, 23 cases were other mutant KRAS and 63 cases were wild-type KRAS. Baseline characteristics by each subset were well-balanced. While one partial response (PR) and 4 stable diseases (SD) cases were found in 7 p.G13D-mutated cases, no PR was found in other KRAS mutated cases. Median PFS of the patients with p.G13D-mutant, other KRAS mutant and KRAS wild-type were 4.5 months (95%CI 1.7-), 2.3 months (95%CI 1.9-4.3), 4.6 months (95%CI 3.5-6.5) respectively. And median OS of the patients with p.G13D- mutant, other KRAS mutant and KRAS wild-type were 9.3months (95%CI 8.5- 11.8), 7.4 months (95%CI 4.5-9.4), 12.2 months (95%CI 8.7-19.8) respectively. Although statistical significance was not found between the two mutated groups, there are trends that the patients with p.G13D-mutant may have received better clinical benefits from Cmab than the patients with other KRAS mutant. Conclusions: Cmab may have therapeutic benefit in the patients with KRAS p.G13D-mutant colorectal cancer although further evaluation is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Clinical outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer harboring KRAS p.G13D mutation treated with cetuximab.
Description:
448 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer patients with KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutated tumors are presently excluded from treatment with cetuximab (Cmab).
On the other hand, a few patients who have mutated KRAS status occasionally respond to Cmab.
The tumors of those patients predominantly had codon 13 mutation, and all codon 13 responder have mutation of p.
G13D.
We now compared the efficacy of Cmab among patients with p.
G13D- mutant, other KRAS mutant and KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer.
Methods: The patients from 9 Japanese institutions were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
All patients were refractory to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, and were treated with Cmab and irinotecan combination regimen.
Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated respectively according to KRAS status.
Results: Ninety four patients were treated with combination therapy.
Among 94 cases, 7 cases were p.
G13D-mutant KRAS, 23 cases were other mutant KRAS and 63 cases were wild-type KRAS.
Baseline characteristics by each subset were well-balanced.
While one partial response (PR) and 4 stable diseases (SD) cases were found in 7 p.
G13D-mutated cases, no PR was found in other KRAS mutated cases.
Median PFS of the patients with p.
G13D-mutant, other KRAS mutant and KRAS wild-type were 4.
5 months (95%CI 1.
7-), 2.
3 months (95%CI 1.
9-4.
3), 4.
6 months (95%CI 3.
5-6.
5) respectively.
And median OS of the patients with p.
G13D- mutant, other KRAS mutant and KRAS wild-type were 9.
3months (95%CI 8.
5- 11.
8), 7.
4 months (95%CI 4.
5-9.
4), 12.
2 months (95%CI 8.
7-19.
8) respectively.
Although statistical significance was not found between the two mutated groups, there are trends that the patients with p.
G13D-mutant may have received better clinical benefits from Cmab than the patients with other KRAS mutant.
Conclusions: Cmab may have therapeutic benefit in the patients with KRAS p.
G13D-mutant colorectal cancer although further evaluation is warranted.
No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Related Results
Mutasi Gen KRAS Ekson 2 Kodon 12 dan 13 Pada Pasien Kanker Kolorektal di RSUP Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah Tahun 2018-2019
Mutasi Gen KRAS Ekson 2 Kodon 12 dan 13 Pada Pasien Kanker Kolorektal di RSUP Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah Tahun 2018-2019
Background:Â Colorectal cancer is commonly found to be regulated by the KRAS gene mutation. Studies reporting the occurrence of mutations in the KRAS gene in Indonesia are still lim...
Abstract 5735: Novel KRAS G12D degrader ASP3082 demonstrates in vivo, dose-dependent KRAS degradation, KRAS pathway inhibition, and antitumor efficacy in multiple KRAS G12D-mutated cancer models
Abstract 5735: Novel KRAS G12D degrader ASP3082 demonstrates in vivo, dose-dependent KRAS degradation, KRAS pathway inhibition, and antitumor efficacy in multiple KRAS G12D-mutated cancer models
Abstract
KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in various cancers. Among KRAS mutations, KRAS G12D is the most frequent driver mutation and is found i...
Abstract 2441: The myCAF and ECM landscape in KRAS-mutated cancer: Utilizing liquid biomarkers to track KRAS-induced fibrosis and KRAS inhibitor efficacy
Abstract 2441: The myCAF and ECM landscape in KRAS-mutated cancer: Utilizing liquid biomarkers to track KRAS-induced fibrosis and KRAS inhibitor efficacy
Abstract
Background:
KRAS-driven cancer represents ∼25% of cancers, with high rates in pancreatic cancer (PDAC), colorect...
Abstract IA07: Molecular characterization of acquired resistance to KRASG12C-EGFR inhibition in colorectal cancer
Abstract IA07: Molecular characterization of acquired resistance to KRASG12C-EGFR inhibition in colorectal cancer
Abstract
Until recently, efforts to pharmacologically target KRAS have been unsuccessful due to its small binding pocket, high affinity for GTP, and redundant mechan...
The Prognostic Impact of KRAS G12C Mutation in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study
The Prognostic Impact of KRAS G12C Mutation in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study
Abstract
Background
KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in colorectal cancer (CRC). Recently, a novel therapy t...
High-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) for KRAS mutational study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC pts).
High-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) for KRAS mutational study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC pts).
515 Background: The use of anti EGFR monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab is restricted to KRAS wild-type (WT) mCRC pts. Standard method for KRAS testing is direct sequ...
Kras Plays An Important Role In Generating Differentiated Blood Cells
Kras Plays An Important Role In Generating Differentiated Blood Cells
Abstract
Background
Kras is a small GTPase essential for mouse embryonic development. Although Kras-/- fetal liver cells reconst...
Abstract 4146: Quantitative cell signaling analysis for cetuximab sensitivity prediction in colorectal cancer
Abstract 4146: Quantitative cell signaling analysis for cetuximab sensitivity prediction in colorectal cancer
Abstract
[Background]
Anti-human EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab) has been widely used in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). However it is ...

