Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Deaf Theater in the United States
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Deaf theater in the United States arises out of the community of American Sign Language users. Deaf theater has existed as skits, pantomimes, and signed songs as long as deaf people have formed communities. The development of formal theater is tied to the establishment of schools for the deaf in the 19th century. The spread of deaf education led to the growth of communities centered on social interactions and entertainments in sign language, including theater. The founding of the National Theatre of the Deaf (NTD) in 1967 was a pivotal moment in the United States. NTD exposed hearing audiences to stage sign language, the capabilities of deaf actors, and the artistic possibilities inherent in the merging of deaf and hearing theater. The success of NTD led to many other deaf theater companies being established throughout the United States, creating a “golden age of Deaf theater.” In addition, opportunities to work with hearing theater companies began to open up, sometimes for only one actor, but sometimes for multiple deaf artists. This type of theater has been termed integrated or mainstreamed theater. While deaf, integrated theater, and mainstreamed theater all incorporate deaf actors and sign language, they can be distinguished on the basis of cultural content and themes, ratios of deaf or hearing people involved, and accessibility for deaf audiences. All forms of deaf theater make artistic use of sign language. The unique linguistic, poetic, and musical elements of sign language create several challenges in producing deaf theater, such as translation approaches and choices, alignment of spoken English, sign language lines, and sometimes music; language access within the world of the play; and language access for audiences. William Shakespeare’s plays present unique challenges for translation due to their highly poetic language. Five recent productions in the United States illustrate the artistic and staging aspects of deaf and integrated theater: Grey House (2023), Richard III (2022), Private Jones (2024), ISM II (2023), and Trash (2023).
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Title: Deaf Theater in the United States
Description:
Abstract
Deaf theater in the United States arises out of the community of American Sign Language users.
Deaf theater has existed as skits, pantomimes, and signed songs as long as deaf people have formed communities.
The development of formal theater is tied to the establishment of schools for the deaf in the 19th century.
The spread of deaf education led to the growth of communities centered on social interactions and entertainments in sign language, including theater.
The founding of the National Theatre of the Deaf (NTD) in 1967 was a pivotal moment in the United States.
NTD exposed hearing audiences to stage sign language, the capabilities of deaf actors, and the artistic possibilities inherent in the merging of deaf and hearing theater.
The success of NTD led to many other deaf theater companies being established throughout the United States, creating a “golden age of Deaf theater.
” In addition, opportunities to work with hearing theater companies began to open up, sometimes for only one actor, but sometimes for multiple deaf artists.
This type of theater has been termed integrated or mainstreamed theater.
While deaf, integrated theater, and mainstreamed theater all incorporate deaf actors and sign language, they can be distinguished on the basis of cultural content and themes, ratios of deaf or hearing people involved, and accessibility for deaf audiences.
All forms of deaf theater make artistic use of sign language.
The unique linguistic, poetic, and musical elements of sign language create several challenges in producing deaf theater, such as translation approaches and choices, alignment of spoken English, sign language lines, and sometimes music; language access within the world of the play; and language access for audiences.
William Shakespeare’s plays present unique challenges for translation due to their highly poetic language.
Five recent productions in the United States illustrate the artistic and staging aspects of deaf and integrated theater: Grey House (2023), Richard III (2022), Private Jones (2024), ISM II (2023), and Trash (2023).
Related Results
Power in Silence: Captions, Deafness, and the Final Girl
Power in Silence: Captions, Deafness, and the Final Girl
IntroductionThe horror film Hush (2016) has attracted attention since its release due to the uniqueness of its central character—a deaf–mute author who lives in a world of silence....
Suicide in deaf populations: a literature review
Suicide in deaf populations: a literature review
Abstract
Background
Studies have found that deaf individuals have higher rates of psychiatric disorder than those who are hearing, while at the s...
Telling Deaf Lives: Agents of Change
Telling Deaf Lives: Agents of Change
<p>In July 2012, the 8th Deaf History International (DHI) Conference featured 27 presentations from members of Deaf communities around the world who related their own autobio...
Telling Deaf Lives: Agents of Change
Telling Deaf Lives: Agents of Change
<p>In July 2012, the 8th Deaf History International (DHI) Conference featured 27 presentations from members of Deaf communities around the world who related their own autobio...
Sign Language and Deaf Education
Sign Language and Deaf Education
Deaf education in Croatia still continues to use a predominantly auditory-speech approach, spoken Croatian only, and simultaneous communication (SC). In the last few years a few ch...
Bridging gaps in deaf epistemology: exploring deaf narratives and perspectives
Bridging gaps in deaf epistemology: exploring deaf narratives and perspectives
Abstract
Deaf epistemology, which focuses on the unique ways deaf individuals navigate and experience the auditory world, has become a critical area of study in r...
Interactions of Deaf Mothers and Deaf Preschool Children: Comparisons with Three Other Groups of Deaf and Hearing Dyads
Interactions of Deaf Mothers and Deaf Preschool Children: Comparisons with Three Other Groups of Deaf and Hearing Dyads
Videotaped samples of interaction were collected from seven deaf mothers and deaf children, 14 hearing mothers and deaf children using oral-only communication, 14 hearing mothers a...

