Javascript must be enabled to continue!
THEORY OF PROVOCATION AFTER MIROSLAW KARWAT
View through CrossRef
The article is dedicated to the contemporary problem of provocation as a popular kind of manipulating, fundamentally developed by the Polish doctor of political sciences Miroslaw Karwat in his book “Theory of provocation. In Light of Political Science". This book contains the typology of the forms and methods of provocations and their functioning in communication. The linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic methods of analysis are used. Positive provocation is constructive, determined as challenge and is applied in flirting, games, pedagogy, family conflicts, etc. Negative provocation is destructive, targeted at forcing something out of someone. The rude forms of the verbal provocation include strong emotional expressions and may be explained after M. Karwat by the intellectual helplessness or narrow mind. Provocation influence evokes illusions, hopes, changes behavior, to unusual, e. g., brutal, accumulates crisis tendencies. Positive and negative provocations are classified into active and passive, emotional and verbal, intentional and unintentional, planned and unplanned, etc. Provocation is the kind of manipulation and when positive it can develop thinking. Deceitful manipulations may be aimed at conflict, antagonism, shocking, destroying mind, triggering emotions, etc. Constructive provocation stimulates mentality, awakens thinking and conscience of society, and reveals the provocateurs’ intentions.
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Title: THEORY OF PROVOCATION AFTER MIROSLAW KARWAT
Description:
The article is dedicated to the contemporary problem of provocation as a popular kind of manipulating, fundamentally developed by the Polish doctor of political sciences Miroslaw Karwat in his book “Theory of provocation.
In Light of Political Science".
This book contains the typology of the forms and methods of provocations and their functioning in communication.
The linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic methods of analysis are used.
Positive provocation is constructive, determined as challenge and is applied in flirting, games, pedagogy, family conflicts, etc.
Negative provocation is destructive, targeted at forcing something out of someone.
The rude forms of the verbal provocation include strong emotional expressions and may be explained after M.
Karwat by the intellectual helplessness or narrow mind.
Provocation influence evokes illusions, hopes, changes behavior, to unusual, e.
g.
, brutal, accumulates crisis tendencies.
Positive and negative provocations are classified into active and passive, emotional and verbal, intentional and unintentional, planned and unplanned, etc.
Provocation is the kind of manipulation and when positive it can develop thinking.
Deceitful manipulations may be aimed at conflict, antagonism, shocking, destroying mind, triggering emotions, etc.
Constructive provocation stimulates mentality, awakens thinking and conscience of society, and reveals the provocateurs’ intentions.
Related Results
Anger and Indirect Relational Aggression in Women: The Puzzling Effect of Moderate Provocation
Anger and Indirect Relational Aggression in Women: The Puzzling Effect of Moderate Provocation
This study sought to investigate the effect of trait-anger on indirect relational aggression in women, under provocation of varying strength. Female undergraduates (N = 174) were a...
Management of Childhood Lead Poisoning: A Survey
Management of Childhood Lead Poisoning: A Survey
Published recommendations (1985) for the management of childhood lead poisoning suggest the use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)provocation testing and chelation as the ma...
Coronary Artery Spasm and Intracoronary Provocation Testing in Modern Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Coronary Artery Spasm and Intracoronary Provocation Testing in Modern Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Background
Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is an important and frequently under-recognized cause of angina, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and myocardial infar...
Abstract 4140903: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Definite versus Intermediate Ergovonine Provocation response in Multivessel Vasospastic Angina Patients
Abstract 4140903: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Definite versus Intermediate Ergovonine Provocation response in Multivessel Vasospastic Angina Patients
Background:
Patients with multivessel coronary spasm showed relatively poor outcomes in vasospastic angina. Recent report also revealed that Ergovonine response definit...
Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex (TFCC) provocation tests: a systematic review
Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex (TFCC) provocation tests: a systematic review
Provocation tests are routinely used in the diagnosis of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex (TFCC) injuries by medical practitioners including physiotherapists and hand therapists. ...
Measurement Invariance and Item Response Theory Analysis of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm
Measurement Invariance and Item Response Theory Analysis of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm
The Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP) is a widely used laboratory aggression task, yet item response theory (IRT) analyses of this task are nonexistent. To estimate these aspects of...
Provocative Syntax
Provocative Syntax
A new theory of syntactic movement within a Chomskyan framework.
Chomsky showed that no description of natural language syntax would be adequate without some notion ...
Breaking the link between provocation and aggression: The role of mitigating information
Breaking the link between provocation and aggression: The role of mitigating information
In two experimental studies, we examine the extent to which strong or weak mitigating information after a provocation alters aggressive responding. In Study 1, we randomly assigned...

