Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Improving Documentation and Communication Using Operative Note Proformas
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Accurate and detailed documentation of surgical procedures is part of good clinical practice, set out by the General Medical Council (GMC). Knee arthroscopy often involves large data sets which require accurate documentation for future assessment and management. This study assesses the quality of documentation of knee arthroscopy, followed by an evaluation of the implementation of a novel operative proforma.
A review of 30 consecutive knee arthroscopy operation notes were analysed for missing information, set against a standardised 30 point criteria. An operation proforma was then introduced, and a further 30 consecutive knee arthroscopy operation notes were analysed. We evaluated allied health professional satisfaction with a Likert point scale survey of 21 allied healthcare professionals (recovery and ward nurses, and physiotherapists) following introduction of the proforma. The mean number of missing items on a 30 point scale was 8.8 (range 0 to 23). Examination under anaesthesia was missed in 43% of cases, tourniquet time in 37% of cases, and wear results in 17% of cases. Following introduction of the proforma, the mean number of missing items was 1.1 (range 0 to 24; p <0.001). This rose to 3.8 after one year (p <0.001) before improvement to 0.7 (p <0.01) with a new and improved proforma. Eighty percent strongly agreed the operation note was clearer, 90% strongly agreed it was more legible, 90% strongly agreed it was more understandable, 50% strongly agreed there was more information recorded, and 100% strongly agreed on the proforma having been improved.
Knee arthroscopy is a common procedure with large data sets, which can often be missed or incomplete. A standardised proforma results in a statistically significant improvement in documentation and reduces the incidence of missing information. They are subjectively clearer, more legible, and generally better compared with handwritten notes. This study demonstrates the improvements in healthcare documentation, both clinically and legally, following introduction of a simple proforma. This concept should be applicable to different specialities and procedures in healthcare.
Title: Improving Documentation and Communication Using Operative Note Proformas
Description:
Abstract
Accurate and detailed documentation of surgical procedures is part of good clinical practice, set out by the General Medical Council (GMC).
Knee arthroscopy often involves large data sets which require accurate documentation for future assessment and management.
This study assesses the quality of documentation of knee arthroscopy, followed by an evaluation of the implementation of a novel operative proforma.
A review of 30 consecutive knee arthroscopy operation notes were analysed for missing information, set against a standardised 30 point criteria.
An operation proforma was then introduced, and a further 30 consecutive knee arthroscopy operation notes were analysed.
We evaluated allied health professional satisfaction with a Likert point scale survey of 21 allied healthcare professionals (recovery and ward nurses, and physiotherapists) following introduction of the proforma.
The mean number of missing items on a 30 point scale was 8.
8 (range 0 to 23).
Examination under anaesthesia was missed in 43% of cases, tourniquet time in 37% of cases, and wear results in 17% of cases.
Following introduction of the proforma, the mean number of missing items was 1.
1 (range 0 to 24; p <0.
001).
This rose to 3.
8 after one year (p <0.
001) before improvement to 0.
7 (p <0.
01) with a new and improved proforma.
Eighty percent strongly agreed the operation note was clearer, 90% strongly agreed it was more legible, 90% strongly agreed it was more understandable, 50% strongly agreed there was more information recorded, and 100% strongly agreed on the proforma having been improved.
Knee arthroscopy is a common procedure with large data sets, which can often be missed or incomplete.
A standardised proforma results in a statistically significant improvement in documentation and reduces the incidence of missing information.
They are subjectively clearer, more legible, and generally better compared with handwritten notes.
This study demonstrates the improvements in healthcare documentation, both clinically and legally, following introduction of a simple proforma.
This concept should be applicable to different specialities and procedures in healthcare.
Related Results
Ary Scheffer, een Nederlandse Fransman
Ary Scheffer, een Nederlandse Fransman
AbstractAry Scheffer (1795-1858) is so generally included in the French School (Note 2)- unsurprisingly, since his career was confined almost entirely to Paris - that the fact that...
Pieter Saenredam: zijn boekenbezit en zijn relatie met de landmeter Pieter Wils
Pieter Saenredam: zijn boekenbezit en zijn relatie met de landmeter Pieter Wils
AbstractAn earlier article on Saenredam's construction drawings (Note, 1 ) left open the question of how he obtained his knowledge of perspective. His teacher Frans de Grebber (Not...
Een serie tekeningen van Johannes Stradanus met scènes uit het leven van de Heilige Giovanni Gualberto
Een serie tekeningen van Johannes Stradanus met scènes uit het leven van de Heilige Giovanni Gualberto
AbstractAmong the extensive collection of pen sketches by Johannes Stradanus (Bruges 1523-Florence 1605) in the Cooper-Hewitt Museum of Design and the Pierpont Morgan Library in Ne...
<b>INTRA-Operative and Post-Operative Common Complications of Hysterectomy</b>
<b>INTRA-Operative and Post-Operative Common Complications of Hysterectomy</b>
Background: Hysterectomy is a common gynecological procedure with potentially significant intra-operative and early post-operative morbidity; context-specific complication profilin...
Operative versus Non-Operative Management of The Medial Malleolus in Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar Fractures – A Systematic Review
Operative versus Non-Operative Management of The Medial Malleolus in Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar Fractures – A Systematic Review
Purpose Ankle fractures are the fifth most common fracture worldwide. Some reviews have shown that non-operative management of isolated medial malleolar fractures has satisfactory ...
Analysis of Types in Business Communication using the TOPSIS Method
Analysis of Types in Business Communication using the TOPSIS Method
Information interchange between employees and others outside the corporation is referred to as business communication. To accomplish organizational objectives, managers and staff i...
The Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score
The Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score
Objectives: No model exists to predict which patients with elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries will successfully return to play (RTP) with non-operative treatment. The r...
Assessment of manual operation note documentation practice: a cross-sectional study
Assessment of manual operation note documentation practice: a cross-sectional study
Background:
Operation note documentation captures the key findings and subtle elements of a surgical strategy and is crucial for patient safety. Poor operation note doc...

