Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prey-driven control of aquatic beetle predator assemblages
View through CrossRef
Trophic interactions are critical determinants of community structure and ecosystem function. In freshwater habitats, top predators are traditionally viewed as drivers of ecosystem structure, shaping populations of consumers and primary producers. The temporary nature of small water bodies makes them dependent on colonization by many organisms, particularly insects that form highly diverse predator assemblages. We conducted two mesocosm experiments to assess how prey (zooplankton) abundances influenced colonization and assemblages of natural populations of aquatic beetles. In the first experiment we removed zooplankton from mesocosms weekly via water changes, whereas in the second experiment we inoculated mesocosms with zooplankton, and both experiments had unmanipulated controls. We collected colonizing adult aquatic beetles weekly, which were identified to species, and periodically assayed zooplankton populations.
Our results from both experiments showed that adult predaceous diving beetles (Dytiscidae) preferentially colonized mesocosms with higher abundances of zooplankton, whereas abundances of the omnivorous water scavenger beetles (Hydrophilidae) did not differ between treatments in both experiments. In the first experiment when we removed zooplankton via water changes, dytiscids preferentially colonized the control mesocosms throughout the duration of the water changes and for over one month after water changes ended, once zooplankton abundances in both treatments equilibrated. In the inoculation experiment, dytiscids again initially preferentially colonized inoculated pools, with colonization of the two treatments converging as zooplankton abundances converged.
In both experiments, differential colonization of mesocosms by dytiscids, higher species richness in mesocosms with abundant zooplankton, and species-specific responses to zooplankton abundances generated distinct beetle assemblages between treatments. We experimentally demonstrate that zooplankton populations can be proximate regulators of predator populations and assemblages via prey density-dependent predator recruitment. Our results provide support for the importance of prey populations in structuring predator populations and the role of habitat selection in structuring communities. We indicate that traditional views of predators as drivers of ecosystem structure in many systems may not provide a comprehensive picture, particularly in the context of highly disturbed or ephemeral habitats.
Title: Prey-driven control of aquatic beetle predator assemblages
Description:
Trophic interactions are critical determinants of community structure and ecosystem function.
In freshwater habitats, top predators are traditionally viewed as drivers of ecosystem structure, shaping populations of consumers and primary producers.
The temporary nature of small water bodies makes them dependent on colonization by many organisms, particularly insects that form highly diverse predator assemblages.
We conducted two mesocosm experiments to assess how prey (zooplankton) abundances influenced colonization and assemblages of natural populations of aquatic beetles.
In the first experiment we removed zooplankton from mesocosms weekly via water changes, whereas in the second experiment we inoculated mesocosms with zooplankton, and both experiments had unmanipulated controls.
We collected colonizing adult aquatic beetles weekly, which were identified to species, and periodically assayed zooplankton populations.
Our results from both experiments showed that adult predaceous diving beetles (Dytiscidae) preferentially colonized mesocosms with higher abundances of zooplankton, whereas abundances of the omnivorous water scavenger beetles (Hydrophilidae) did not differ between treatments in both experiments.
In the first experiment when we removed zooplankton via water changes, dytiscids preferentially colonized the control mesocosms throughout the duration of the water changes and for over one month after water changes ended, once zooplankton abundances in both treatments equilibrated.
In the inoculation experiment, dytiscids again initially preferentially colonized inoculated pools, with colonization of the two treatments converging as zooplankton abundances converged.
In both experiments, differential colonization of mesocosms by dytiscids, higher species richness in mesocosms with abundant zooplankton, and species-specific responses to zooplankton abundances generated distinct beetle assemblages between treatments.
We experimentally demonstrate that zooplankton populations can be proximate regulators of predator populations and assemblages via prey density-dependent predator recruitment.
Our results provide support for the importance of prey populations in structuring predator populations and the role of habitat selection in structuring communities.
We indicate that traditional views of predators as drivers of ecosystem structure in many systems may not provide a comprehensive picture, particularly in the context of highly disturbed or ephemeral habitats.
Related Results
General mechanisms for a top-down origin of the predator-prey power law
General mechanisms for a top-down origin of the predator-prey power law
Abstract
The ratio of predator-to-prey biomass density is not constant along ecological gradients: denser ecosystems tend to have fewer predators...
Refining prey selection for cheetahs and lions: The influence of prey demography and season
Refining prey selection for cheetahs and lions: The influence of prey demography and season
Abstract
Traditional prey preference models use a coarse species-specific prey body mass of three-quarters of adult female body mass, assumed to reflect the average mass ac...
Physiological and behavioral stress responses to predators are altered by prior predator experience in juvenile qingbo (Spinibarbus sinensis)
Physiological and behavioral stress responses to predators are altered by prior predator experience in juvenile qingbo (Spinibarbus sinensis)
All vertebrates exhibit physiological responses to predator stress, and these responses are the basis of appropriate behavioral adaptation. We aimed to identify the physiological a...
On potential cooperation in predator-prey interactions in fishes
On potential cooperation in predator-prey interactions in fishes
Predator – prey interaction provide the context for some of the best-studied cases of cooperation. Some predator species can hunt together and coordinate their moves within active ...
Analisis Dinamik Model Predator-Prey Dengan Fungsi Respon Monod Haldane
Analisis Dinamik Model Predator-Prey Dengan Fungsi Respon Monod Haldane
Setiap makhluk hidup tidak terlepas untuk berinteraksi dengan makhluk hidup lainnya.Interaksi terjadi ketika dua atau lebih spesies memiliki efek atau mempunyai pengaruh terhadap m...
Shared predation: positive effects of predator distraction
Shared predation: positive effects of predator distraction
Abstract
Simple rules based on population equilibria can characterize indirect interactions in three-species systems but fail to predict them whe...
Interspecific carnivore competition and ungulate predation correlate with predator species richness
Interspecific carnivore competition and ungulate predation correlate with predator species richness
AbstractCompetition for resources underlies the development of ecological community structure and function. Niche compression occurs when species reduce resource use due to competi...
MODEL MATEMATIKA MANGSA PEMANGSA TIGA SPESIES DENGAN FUNGSI RESPON HOLLING TIPE II DAN HOLLING TIPE IV SERTA PEMANENAN PADA POPULASI MANGSA
MODEL MATEMATIKA MANGSA PEMANGSA TIGA SPESIES DENGAN FUNGSI RESPON HOLLING TIPE II DAN HOLLING TIPE IV SERTA PEMANENAN PADA POPULASI MANGSA
In this world, living things are interdependent. Every living creature needs another living creature, so there is an interaction between the two. One of interactions that occur in ...

