Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Temporal Sweetness Profile of MNEI and Comparison with Commercial Sweeteners

View through CrossRef
AbstractNone of the current sweeteners match sucrose in terms of sweet taste quality or temporal characteristics. In fact, the sensory performance of a sweetener changes over time and it could interact with other stimuli. Time–intensity (t‐I) and temporal of dominance sensation (TDS) are both dynamic sensory methods, but they give different and complementary information: t‐I focuses on the evolution of the intensity of one attribute, whereas TDS is a descriptive multi‐attribute methodology that deals with the interactions among attributes.The objectives of this study were to describe the sweetness temporal profile of a new protein‐based sweetener, MNEI, and to compare it with that of aspartame, saccharin and sucrose. First, equi‐sweetness values of MNEI and of three sweeteners were determined. Then, those concentrations were investigated: the intensity of sweetness over time was evaluated in aqueous solutions by the t‐I method; the interaction between sweetness and other sensory stimuli was evaluated in more complex solutions, containing flavoring and acidifying agents, by means of the TDS method. t‐I results showed that the sweetness provided by MNEI decreased later than the others, in different times, and it was not extinguished completely, whereas TDS results showed that the dominant attributes of model beverages were almost the same for all sweeteners.Practical ApplicationsThe structure of MNEI is completely compatible with that of natural proteins. This protein determines a sensory performance similar to that of other studied sweeteners, especially aspartame, but has been proven to be stable in heat treatment and pH changes. No off‐flavor that generally characterizes many high‐intensity sweeteners (HIS) was detected when tested by the assessors. Indeed, even if the sweetness imparted by MNEI was perceived later than the sweetness provided by sucrose, in the presence of other stimuli, no significant differences were detected. These properties could make MNEI a good choice as HIS for low‐calorie beverages and dairy products.
Title: Temporal Sweetness Profile of MNEI and Comparison with Commercial Sweeteners
Description:
AbstractNone of the current sweeteners match sucrose in terms of sweet taste quality or temporal characteristics.
In fact, the sensory performance of a sweetener changes over time and it could interact with other stimuli.
Time–intensity (t‐I) and temporal of dominance sensation (TDS) are both dynamic sensory methods, but they give different and complementary information: t‐I focuses on the evolution of the intensity of one attribute, whereas TDS is a descriptive multi‐attribute methodology that deals with the interactions among attributes.
The objectives of this study were to describe the sweetness temporal profile of a new protein‐based sweetener, MNEI, and to compare it with that of aspartame, saccharin and sucrose.
First, equi‐sweetness values of MNEI and of three sweeteners were determined.
Then, those concentrations were investigated: the intensity of sweetness over time was evaluated in aqueous solutions by the t‐I method; the interaction between sweetness and other sensory stimuli was evaluated in more complex solutions, containing flavoring and acidifying agents, by means of the TDS method.
t‐I results showed that the sweetness provided by MNEI decreased later than the others, in different times, and it was not extinguished completely, whereas TDS results showed that the dominant attributes of model beverages were almost the same for all sweeteners.
Practical ApplicationsThe structure of MNEI is completely compatible with that of natural proteins.
This protein determines a sensory performance similar to that of other studied sweeteners, especially aspartame, but has been proven to be stable in heat treatment and pH changes.
No off‐flavor that generally characterizes many high‐intensity sweeteners (HIS) was detected when tested by the assessors.
Indeed, even if the sweetness imparted by MNEI was perceived later than the sweetness provided by sucrose, in the presence of other stimuli, no significant differences were detected.
These properties could make MNEI a good choice as HIS for low‐calorie beverages and dairy products.

Related Results

Chemistry of Food Sweeteners
Chemistry of Food Sweeteners
This review delves into the chemistry of food sweeteners and provides a holistic classification based on chemistry and intensity of sweetness. Unique in this research is the combin...
Microbial production of sweeteners and their industrial applications: Current status and future prospects
Microbial production of sweeteners and their industrial applications: Current status and future prospects
Sweeteners are chemical compounds with sweet taste. They are categorized into six groups, namely artificial sweeteners, modified sugars, natural calorie sweeteners, natural zero-ca...
Sugar Substitutes and Sweeteners in Confectionery Technology
Sugar Substitutes and Sweeteners in Confectionery Technology
Introduction. Targeted diabetic confectionery for people with carbohydrate metabolism impairment includes sugar substitutes or sweeteners instead of sugar. At the same time, modifi...
An Analytical Study of Natural Sweeteners and Flavors in Human Nutrition
An Analytical Study of Natural Sweeteners and Flavors in Human Nutrition
Natural Sweeteners are chemical substances that are present in nature. They can be synthesized chemically. They have a sweet taste. So, they can be used as a Sweetening and Flavori...
Role of the Frontal Lobes in the Propagation of Mesial Temporal Lobe Seizures
Role of the Frontal Lobes in the Propagation of Mesial Temporal Lobe Seizures
Summary: The depth ictal electroencephalographic (EEG) propagation sequence accompanying 78 complex partial seizures of mesial temporal origin was reviewed in 24 patients (15 from...
Safety of Food Additives: Sweeteners
Safety of Food Additives: Sweeteners
Aspartame, acesulfame K, cyclamate, sucralose, steviol, saccharin, neotame and glycosides are known as artificial sweeteners. Such sweeteners are considered as risk factors in the ...
The impact of artificial sweeteners on human health and metabolism
The impact of artificial sweeteners on human health and metabolism
Artificial sweeteners have become a common way to save calories by replacing sugar with sweetness. Their effects on human health and metabolism, however, are hotly debated. Here, t...
The Modeling of Non-invasive Measurement of Fruit Sweetness using Near-Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy Method
The Modeling of Non-invasive Measurement of Fruit Sweetness using Near-Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy Method
Abstract The sugary content in fruit requires knowledge for both the maker and the consumer. Methods of evaluating the level of sweetness in fruits as previously des...

Back to Top