Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Testing Graphical Causal Models Using the R Package “dagitty”
View through CrossRef
AbstractCausal diagrams such as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are used in several scientific fields to help design and analyze studies that aim to infer causal effects from observational data; for example, DAGs can help identify suitable strategies to reduce confounding bias. However, DAGs can be difficult to design, and the validity of any DAG‐derived strategy hinges on the validity of the postulated DAG itself. Researchers should therefore check whether the assumptions encoded in the DAG are consistent with the data before proceeding with the analysis. Here, we explain how the R package ‘dagitty’, based on the web tool dagitty.net, can be used to test the statistical implications of the assumptions encoded in a given DAG. We hope that this will help researchers discover model specification errors, avoid erroneous conclusions, and build better models. © 2021 The Authors.This article was corrected on 19 July 2022. See the end of the full text for details.Basic Protocol 1: Constructing and importing DAG models from the dagitty web interfaceSupport Protocol 1: Installing R, RStudio, and the dagitty packageBasic Protocol 2: Testing DAGs against categorical dataBasic Protocol 3: Testing DAGs against continuous dataSupport Protocol 2: Testing DAGs against continuous data with non‐linearitiesBasic Protocol 4: Testing DAGs against a combination of categorical and continuous data
Title: Testing Graphical Causal Models Using the R Package “dagitty”
Description:
AbstractCausal diagrams such as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are used in several scientific fields to help design and analyze studies that aim to infer causal effects from observational data; for example, DAGs can help identify suitable strategies to reduce confounding bias.
However, DAGs can be difficult to design, and the validity of any DAG‐derived strategy hinges on the validity of the postulated DAG itself.
Researchers should therefore check whether the assumptions encoded in the DAG are consistent with the data before proceeding with the analysis.
Here, we explain how the R package ‘dagitty’, based on the web tool dagitty.
net, can be used to test the statistical implications of the assumptions encoded in a given DAG.
We hope that this will help researchers discover model specification errors, avoid erroneous conclusions, and build better models.
© 2021 The Authors.
This article was corrected on 19 July 2022.
See the end of the full text for details.
Basic Protocol 1: Constructing and importing DAG models from the dagitty web interfaceSupport Protocol 1: Installing R, RStudio, and the dagitty packageBasic Protocol 2: Testing DAGs against categorical dataBasic Protocol 3: Testing DAGs against continuous dataSupport Protocol 2: Testing DAGs against continuous data with non‐linearitiesBasic Protocol 4: Testing DAGs against a combination of categorical and continuous data.
Related Results
Causal discovery and prediction: methods and algorithms
Causal discovery and prediction: methods and algorithms
(English) This thesis focuses on the discovery of causal relations and on the prediction of causal effects. Regarding causal discovery, this thesis introduces a novel and generic m...
A Practical Guide to Causal Inference in Three-Wave Panel Studies
A Practical Guide to Causal Inference in Three-Wave Panel Studies
Causal inference from observational data poses considerable challenges. This guide explains an approach to estimating causal effects using panel data focussing on the three-wave pa...
Foundations of causal discovery on groups of variables
Foundations of causal discovery on groups of variables
Abstract
Discovering causal relationships from observational data is a challenging task that relies on assumptions connecting statistical quantities to graphical or ...
New airGR developments: semi-distribution and data assimilation
New airGR developments: semi-distribution and data assimilation
<p>airGR (Coron et al., 2017, 2020) is an R package that offers the possibility to use the GR rainfall-runoff models developed in the Hydrology Research Group at INRA...
Operational decision-making with machine learning and causal inference
Operational decision-making with machine learning and causal inference
Optimizing operational decisions, routine actions within some business or operational process, is a key challenge across a variety of domains and application areas. The increasing ...
Causal explanation
Causal explanation
An explanation is an answer to a why-question, and so a causal explanation is an answer to ‘Why X?’ that says something about the causes of X. For example, ‘Because it rained’ as a...
Bio-rational management packages of jassid and shoot and fruit borer of okra
Bio-rational management packages of jassid and shoot and fruit borer of okra
The study was conducted for bio-rational management of jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula), and shoot and fruit borer of okra (Earias vittella) at experimental field of Bangladesh...
Causal AI for strategic business planning: uncovering latent drivers of long-term organizational performance and resilience
Causal AI for strategic business planning: uncovering latent drivers of long-term organizational performance and resilience
In the era of digital transformation and data ubiquity, organizations are increasingly shifting from descriptive and predictive analytics toward causal AI to inform long-term strat...

