Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Latin America

View through CrossRef
Abstract This chapter explains administrative procedure and judicial review in Latin America. Judicial review of administrative action has been constitutionalised in many Latin American countries, like Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela, and has been the object of special laws regulating the jurisdiction. According to the Constitutions and to the laws regulating the contentious administrative jurisdiction in Latin America, all administrative provisions are subjected to judicial review as it is not possible for any administrative act to escape judicial control. Therefore, the principle applicable is the universal character of the judicial oversight of constitutionality and unlawfulness regarding regulations and administrative acts, which is exercised by the Courts without exception. In almost all Latin American countries, the rules of administrative procedure are regulated through special Administrative Procedure Lasw (APLs), which began to be sanctioned in 1972 (Argentina). In all cases where the courts find that a challenged administrative act infringes the fundamental rights of an individual or corporation, or does not meet the fundamental standards of administrative propriety and fairness, the courts of the contentious administrative jurisdiction in all Latin American countries have the power not only to annul the challenged act but, depending on the nature of the claim filed by the plaintiff, the courts can also award damages for the administrative action.
Title: Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Latin America
Description:
Abstract This chapter explains administrative procedure and judicial review in Latin America.
Judicial review of administrative action has been constitutionalised in many Latin American countries, like Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela, and has been the object of special laws regulating the jurisdiction.
According to the Constitutions and to the laws regulating the contentious administrative jurisdiction in Latin America, all administrative provisions are subjected to judicial review as it is not possible for any administrative act to escape judicial control.
Therefore, the principle applicable is the universal character of the judicial oversight of constitutionality and unlawfulness regarding regulations and administrative acts, which is exercised by the Courts without exception.
In almost all Latin American countries, the rules of administrative procedure are regulated through special Administrative Procedure Lasw (APLs), which began to be sanctioned in 1972 (Argentina).
In all cases where the courts find that a challenged administrative act infringes the fundamental rights of an individual or corporation, or does not meet the fundamental standards of administrative propriety and fairness, the courts of the contentious administrative jurisdiction in all Latin American countries have the power not only to annul the challenged act but, depending on the nature of the claim filed by the plaintiff, the courts can also award damages for the administrative action.

Related Results

Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Europe and Latin America
Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Europe and Latin America
Abstract This chapter provides a comparison of the discipline of judicial review of administrative action in Latin America and in Europe. In terms of judicial review...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
The article analyzes the provisions of procedural legislation on judicial conciliation and judicial conciliators. The authors review the provisions of several draft laws that conta...
Judicial constitutional review and the transformation of modern constitutionalism: problems of harmonization and development
Judicial constitutional review and the transformation of modern constitutionalism: problems of harmonization and development
The relevance of the research topic lies in the significance of judicial constitutional review as a key institution that ensures stability and development of the constitutional ord...
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in France
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in France
Abstract This chapter describes administrative procedure and judicial review in France. In French public law, no constitutional provision provides for judicial revie...
Consideration As A Criminal Sanction
Consideration As A Criminal Sanction
In the list of types of liability traditionally distinguished in the legal system of Armenia, procedural, including criminal, liability was not included. The 1998 edition of the RA...
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the United Kingdom
Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in the United Kingdom
Abstract This chapter focuses on administrative procedure and judicial review in the United Kingdom. Initially, it should be stressed that administrative law is diff...

Back to Top