Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A study on the optimal shareholding proportion of the controlling shareholders in the competitive mixed‐ownership enterprises: Evidence from Chinese listed companies
View through CrossRef
AbstractThere is a wide debate on the optimal shareholding proportion of controlling shareholders. Under the background of China's mixed‐ownership reform, this paper focuses on a specific firm setting of mixed‐ownership enterprises in fully competitive industries, and tries to find the heterogeneity in the association between controllers' shareholding and firm performance. Specifically, with a sample of China's A‐share listed companies from 2007 to 2018, we find significant differences in this relationship due to different types of controlling shareholders. The effect of controller shareholding on firm performance is not significant in foreign‐controlled enterprises, while that of private enterprises presents a monotone increasing linear relation with statistical significance. No optimal controlling shareholding interval is found in either foreign‐controlled or private‐controlled enterprise. In state‐controlled enterprises, we find an overall inverted U‐shaped with local stage linear relationship between state‐controlling enterprises' controller shareholding and firm performance. The optimal interval of state‐controlling shareholding is 42%–68%.
Title: A study on the optimal shareholding proportion of the controlling shareholders in the competitive mixed‐ownership enterprises: Evidence from Chinese listed companies
Description:
AbstractThere is a wide debate on the optimal shareholding proportion of controlling shareholders.
Under the background of China's mixed‐ownership reform, this paper focuses on a specific firm setting of mixed‐ownership enterprises in fully competitive industries, and tries to find the heterogeneity in the association between controllers' shareholding and firm performance.
Specifically, with a sample of China's A‐share listed companies from 2007 to 2018, we find significant differences in this relationship due to different types of controlling shareholders.
The effect of controller shareholding on firm performance is not significant in foreign‐controlled enterprises, while that of private enterprises presents a monotone increasing linear relation with statistical significance.
No optimal controlling shareholding interval is found in either foreign‐controlled or private‐controlled enterprise.
In state‐controlled enterprises, we find an overall inverted U‐shaped with local stage linear relationship between state‐controlling enterprises' controller shareholding and firm performance.
The optimal interval of state‐controlling shareholding is 42%–68%.
Related Results
Performance Study on Reverse Mixed-Ownership Reform of Private Enterprises
Performance Study on Reverse Mixed-Ownership Reform of Private Enterprises
Since the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee in 1978, especially with the introduction of the State-owned Enterprise Reform Three-Year Action Plan, the mixed-owner...
Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial Dan Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kebijakan Hutang Sebagai Variabel Intervening
Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial Dan Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kebijakan Hutang Sebagai Variabel Intervening
Background - Increasing company value one of the determining factors is ownership structure. Managerial ownership will tend to improve management performance for the benefit of the...
Ownership structure and R&D investment: the role of identity and contestability in Spanish listed firms
Ownership structure and R&D investment: the role of identity and contestability in Spanish listed firms
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between the ownership structure and the investment in research and development (R&D) for a sample of listed Span...
DETERMINAN PEMILIHAN KANTOR AKUNTAN PUBLIK (KAP)
DETERMINAN PEMILIHAN KANTOR AKUNTAN PUBLIK (KAP)
Abstract
In the process of maximizing the value of the company, a conflict of interest between the manager and the shareholders often arises, which is often called an agency ...
Democratization of property relations
Democratization of property relations
The process of democratization of property relations has affected, first of all, the European area, and then the other parts of the world. Having been established with a clear econ...
Equity Pledging by Controlling Shareholders, Executive Incentives, and Corporate Innovation
Equity Pledging by Controlling Shareholders, Executive Incentives, and Corporate Innovation
In recent years, equity pledging by controlling shareholders has expanded rapidly as an emerging financing mechanism. Although existing studies document that equity pledging by con...
China's Special Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance Research
China's Special Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance Research
This research discusses the impact of China's unique ownership structure and corporate governance on ownership concentration. China has a unique ownership structure with a large nu...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

