Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

15. The Parties to a Judicial Review: Who Can Make a Claim for Judicial Review and Against Whom Can a Claim for Judicial Review be Made?

View through CrossRef
Titles in the Complete series combine extracts from a wide range of primary materials with clear explanatory text to provide readers with a complete introductory resource. This chapter discusses the bodies subject to judicial review and who can make claims for judicial review. An action for judicial review can be brought only against a body exercising a public function. If public authorities are carrying out a private function, they are not subject to judicial review unless there is a public law element. Private bodies are, generally, not subject to judicial review unless it can be shown that they are carrying out a public function, such as administering a statutory scheme. If the judicial review concerns human rights, then the claim must be brought against a public authority. The Human Rights Act 1998 creates two kinds of public authorities: core public authorities and functional public authorities. Core public authorities are public authorities, such as government departments and the police force. Functional public authorities have private and public functions, but only their public functions are subject to the Act. The rules of standing in judicial review cases determine whether individuals or groups are permitted to challenge a decision of a public body. An individual or organization may bring a claim for judicial review only with the permission of the courts, which means that standing restricts the people and organizations that may bring a judicial review claim.
Title: 15. The Parties to a Judicial Review: Who Can Make a Claim for Judicial Review and Against Whom Can a Claim for Judicial Review be Made?
Description:
Titles in the Complete series combine extracts from a wide range of primary materials with clear explanatory text to provide readers with a complete introductory resource.
This chapter discusses the bodies subject to judicial review and who can make claims for judicial review.
An action for judicial review can be brought only against a body exercising a public function.
If public authorities are carrying out a private function, they are not subject to judicial review unless there is a public law element.
Private bodies are, generally, not subject to judicial review unless it can be shown that they are carrying out a public function, such as administering a statutory scheme.
If the judicial review concerns human rights, then the claim must be brought against a public authority.
The Human Rights Act 1998 creates two kinds of public authorities: core public authorities and functional public authorities.
Core public authorities are public authorities, such as government departments and the police force.
Functional public authorities have private and public functions, but only their public functions are subject to the Act.
The rules of standing in judicial review cases determine whether individuals or groups are permitted to challenge a decision of a public body.
An individual or organization may bring a claim for judicial review only with the permission of the courts, which means that standing restricts the people and organizations that may bring a judicial review claim.

Related Results

The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
The Role of the Judiciary in Constitutional Interpretation in Pakistan
This study examines the evolving role of the judiciary in Pakistan in interpreting the Constitution, exploring how the courts have come to terms with their position as the primary ...
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman
The discourse between the application of judicial activism or judicial restraint has become a hot issue of judicial review authority where recently the Constitutional Court through...
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
JUDICIAL CONCILIATION AND JUDICIAL CONCILIATOR
The article analyzes the provisions of procedural legislation on judicial conciliation and judicial conciliators. The authors review the provisions of several draft laws that conta...
Internal Democracy in Pakistani Religious Parties: A Comparative Analysis of Jamiat-e-Ulema Islam and Jamaat-e-Islami
Internal Democracy in Pakistani Religious Parties: A Comparative Analysis of Jamiat-e-Ulema Islam and Jamaat-e-Islami
Democratization is an important phenomenon in the contemporary world. An important feature of modern representative democracy is the emergence of political parties, as these are re...
Pelatihan Teknik Merias Wajah Pesta Siang dan Pesta Malam
Pelatihan Teknik Merias Wajah Pesta Siang dan Pesta Malam
The Course was given to the teenagers which was held in the Rammang-Rammang Tourism Village, Bontoa District, Maros Regency, South Sulawesi Province. Partner groups need training o...
Funkcije komunikacijski relevantne šutnje u njemačkome
Funkcije komunikacijski relevantne šutnje u njemačkome
Additionally, this chapter presents research of silence with review of main aspects of papers in the field of conversational analysis, ethnography of communication and metaphor of ...
Judicial constitutional review and the transformation of modern constitutionalism: problems of harmonization and development
Judicial constitutional review and the transformation of modern constitutionalism: problems of harmonization and development
The relevance of the research topic lies in the significance of judicial constitutional review as a key institution that ensures stability and development of the constitutional ord...

Back to Top