Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Models, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of supportive care in cancer: a scoping review
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Purpose
There is wide heterogeneity of supportive cancer care provision in the UK. Greater understanding of evidence-based models is key to developing standards for care. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify the evidence-based models of delivering supportive care to patients with cancer, the outcomes measured, and the facilitators and barriers to accessing supportive care.
Methods
We conducted an extensive search using MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PsychINFO, EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL from 2000 until 2025 to identify (i) the existing service and workforce models/designs supporting supportive care delivery; (ii) the benefits, costs, and outcomes relating to these services; and (iii) the facilitators and barriers to setting up services. Data were analysed using tabular summaries and content analysis.
Results
One hundred and fifteen articles were analysed. Thirty-six distinct models of supportive care delivered by different professional groups were identified. Outpatient multiprofessional clinic models demonstrated the greatest number of positive patient outcomes. Positive outcomes were also described from digital, educational, and patient navigation models. Quality of life was the commonest reported primary outcome. Facilitators and barriers were described within five overarching themes: knowledge and understanding among healthcare professionals, clinical resource, logistics and organisation, patient-specific considerations, and digital considerations.
Conclusion
A variety of evidence-based models were identified with a range of outcome measures and a plurality of described facilitators and barriers. Future work involving patients and professionals delivering existing supportive care services is needed to investigate which models could be adopted at scale within the NHS to facilitate the standardisation of supportive care in UK cancer care.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Models, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of supportive care in cancer: a scoping review
Description:
Abstract
Purpose
There is wide heterogeneity of supportive cancer care provision in the UK.
Greater understanding of evidence-based models is key to developing standards for care.
The purpose of this scoping review is to identify the evidence-based models of delivering supportive care to patients with cancer, the outcomes measured, and the facilitators and barriers to accessing supportive care.
Methods
We conducted an extensive search using MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PsychINFO, EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL from 2000 until 2025 to identify (i) the existing service and workforce models/designs supporting supportive care delivery; (ii) the benefits, costs, and outcomes relating to these services; and (iii) the facilitators and barriers to setting up services.
Data were analysed using tabular summaries and content analysis.
Results
One hundred and fifteen articles were analysed.
Thirty-six distinct models of supportive care delivered by different professional groups were identified.
Outpatient multiprofessional clinic models demonstrated the greatest number of positive patient outcomes.
Positive outcomes were also described from digital, educational, and patient navigation models.
Quality of life was the commonest reported primary outcome.
Facilitators and barriers were described within five overarching themes: knowledge and understanding among healthcare professionals, clinical resource, logistics and organisation, patient-specific considerations, and digital considerations.
Conclusion
A variety of evidence-based models were identified with a range of outcome measures and a plurality of described facilitators and barriers.
Future work involving patients and professionals delivering existing supportive care services is needed to investigate which models could be adopted at scale within the NHS to facilitate the standardisation of supportive care in UK cancer care.
Related Results
Care models for Individuals with Chronic Multimorbidity: Elements, Impact, Implementation Challenges and Facilitators
Care models for Individuals with Chronic Multimorbidity: Elements, Impact, Implementation Challenges and Facilitators
Abstract
Background
Patients with multiple long-term conditions requires specialized care models to manage their complex health needs. Understanding the existing care mode...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Refocusing cancer supportive care: a framework for integrated cancer care
Refocusing cancer supportive care: a framework for integrated cancer care
Abstract
Objective
Cancer supportive care comprises an integrative field of multidisciplinary services necessary for people affected by cancer to m...
A mixed method study on supportive supervision of Community Health Workers from Central India
A mixed method study on supportive supervision of Community Health Workers from Central India
Abstract
Introduction
Supportive supervision of the Community health workers (CHWs) are critical for their efficient functionin...
Well-being focused interventions for caregivers of children with developmental disabilities-a scoping review protocol
Well-being focused interventions for caregivers of children with developmental disabilities-a scoping review protocol
AbstractIntroductionChildren with developmental disabilities (DD) have complex health needs which imply that they will need assistance in many areas of their lives, a role usually ...
GP CanShare - Enhancing Cancer Management in Primary Care with integrated cancer care
GP CanShare - Enhancing Cancer Management in Primary Care with integrated cancer care
Who? Cancer impacts many peoples’ lives. The number of people living with and beyond, a cancer diagnosis is increasing significantly and they are faced with complex decisions, with...
Parental Views of Facilitators and Barriers to Research Participation: Systematic Review
Parental Views of Facilitators and Barriers to Research Participation: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESLow enrollment within pediatric research increases the cost of research, decreases generalizability, and threatens to exacerbate existing health disparitie...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...

