Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Martin Luther on the Vocations of the Christian

View through CrossRef
Abstract A teaching of Martin Luther that has had great historical effect is his teaching on vocation. Protesting the Roman Catholic arrangement in which the clergy had callings of higher religious and moral significance than the laity, Luther taught that all Christians have callings or vocations, and that all callings are equal in moral and religious seriousness. They only differ in function. This teaching unleashed unprecedented commitment and energy to worldly work in the Western world. Paralleling his teaching on the priesthood of all believers, Luther taught that all Christians are called by God through Christ to be his beloved and forgiven children, and that they need no mediators to receive that graceful call directly. At the same time, however, Christians who receive that grace through Christ become priests to their neighbors, mediating God’s love through them to the neighbor. They do that very concretely in their vocations. Thus, Christians become conduits of God’s love received through Christ and offered to the neighbor in the various places of responsibility they have been given. For Luther, Christians do not need to cast about for places to exercise their obedience; they were given in the orders of creation into which each Christian was inevitably placed—marriage and family life, work, citizenship, and church. Each person—lay and clergy alike—is called to work in the world. In fulfilling their work gladly and conscientiously, they serve their neighbor. Plain ordinary work is transformed into a Christian vocation as the Christian exercises his faith-active-in-love. Work is no longer simply a job or occupation; it is a calling, a vocation. It is a summons from God. Vocation is also where the Spirit sanctifies the Christian’s life, not in a self-centered quest for perfection, but rather in humble service to the neighbor. While Luther thought there were some occupations that were off-limits to Christians, he accepted most worldly roles as useful to the neighbor. The Christian could be a soldier in a just war and even a hangman in a just cause. One alleged weakness of the classic Lutheran teaching on vocation, however, was that it tended to accept uncritically the roles prescribed by the world. In such teaching, the Christian willingly does what the world prescribes. However, recent Lutheran interpretations of vocation are more dynamic. For example, Gustav Wingren, in Luther on Vocation, argued not only that the orders of creation are dynamic and call for constructive change, but that in Christian vocation the two ways that God reigns in the world intersect. The Christian under the reign of God’s gospel interjects the love liberated by that gospel into one’s worldly occupation, transforming it into a genuine vocation. Love has a transformative effect. It functions critically and constructively. Lutheranism at its best has incorporated more dynamic elements into its great teaching on vocation.
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Title: Martin Luther on the Vocations of the Christian
Description:
Abstract A teaching of Martin Luther that has had great historical effect is his teaching on vocation.
Protesting the Roman Catholic arrangement in which the clergy had callings of higher religious and moral significance than the laity, Luther taught that all Christians have callings or vocations, and that all callings are equal in moral and religious seriousness.
They only differ in function.
This teaching unleashed unprecedented commitment and energy to worldly work in the Western world.
Paralleling his teaching on the priesthood of all believers, Luther taught that all Christians are called by God through Christ to be his beloved and forgiven children, and that they need no mediators to receive that graceful call directly.
At the same time, however, Christians who receive that grace through Christ become priests to their neighbors, mediating God’s love through them to the neighbor.
They do that very concretely in their vocations.
Thus, Christians become conduits of God’s love received through Christ and offered to the neighbor in the various places of responsibility they have been given.
For Luther, Christians do not need to cast about for places to exercise their obedience; they were given in the orders of creation into which each Christian was inevitably placed—marriage and family life, work, citizenship, and church.
Each person—lay and clergy alike—is called to work in the world.
In fulfilling their work gladly and conscientiously, they serve their neighbor.
Plain ordinary work is transformed into a Christian vocation as the Christian exercises his faith-active-in-love.
Work is no longer simply a job or occupation; it is a calling, a vocation.
It is a summons from God.
Vocation is also where the Spirit sanctifies the Christian’s life, not in a self-centered quest for perfection, but rather in humble service to the neighbor.
While Luther thought there were some occupations that were off-limits to Christians, he accepted most worldly roles as useful to the neighbor.
The Christian could be a soldier in a just war and even a hangman in a just cause.
One alleged weakness of the classic Lutheran teaching on vocation, however, was that it tended to accept uncritically the roles prescribed by the world.
In such teaching, the Christian willingly does what the world prescribes.
However, recent Lutheran interpretations of vocation are more dynamic.
For example, Gustav Wingren, in Luther on Vocation, argued not only that the orders of creation are dynamic and call for constructive change, but that in Christian vocation the two ways that God reigns in the world intersect.
The Christian under the reign of God’s gospel interjects the love liberated by that gospel into one’s worldly occupation, transforming it into a genuine vocation.
Love has a transformative effect.
It functions critically and constructively.
Lutheranism at its best has incorporated more dynamic elements into its great teaching on vocation.

Related Results

The Luther Renaissance
The Luther Renaissance
The Luther Renaissance is the most important international network for Luther research, as well as an ecclesial, ecumenical and cultural reform movement between 1900 and 1960 in Ge...
Johannes von Staupitz’s Influence on Martin Luther
Johannes von Staupitz’s Influence on Martin Luther
The impact of Johannes von Staupitz (c. 1468–1524) on Martin Luther can hardly be overestimated. Staupitz was elected vicar general of the reformed Augustinian Order in 1503. Betwe...
Martin Luther’s Understanding of Earlier Reformers
Martin Luther’s Understanding of Earlier Reformers
Throughout his career as a reformer, Martin Luther often framed his critiques of the institutional Church and his original doctrinal formulations with references—both implicit and ...
Martin Luther and Love
Martin Luther and Love
Abstract The questions of love’s nature and its different forms were crucial to Martin Luther from the beginning of his theological career. Already as a young mon...
Martin Luther and Ontology
Martin Luther and Ontology
Although many have interpreted Luther as “anti-metaphysical” and therefore unconcerned with the question of being, careful scrutiny of his texts shows otherwise. Trained at Erfurt ...
Martin Luther in Karl Marx
Martin Luther in Karl Marx
Abstract The topic of Luther in Marxism is vast and too diffuse to be useful to define issues and orient future research. However, the more limited topic of Luthe...
Martin Luther in Norway
Martin Luther in Norway
Until 1814, Norway was under Danish rule, and the story of Luther’s reception in Norway is included in the story of Luther’s reception in Denmark (cf. Niels Henrik Gregersen’s arti...
Martin Luther on Grace
Martin Luther on Grace
Abstract Grace is an essential element of Christian theological reflection. Primarily, the divine attribute or trait labeled “grace” refers to God’s disposition a...

Back to Top