Javascript must be enabled to continue!
China-ASEAN Economic Ties: Balancing Growth amid Middle-Income Challenges and Opportunities
View through CrossRef
The introduction of a free trade area between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China (ACFTA) in 2012 brought China to a leading economic position in Southeast Asia (this was manifested in a significant, almost 2.2-fold, increase in the volume of trade) and turned it into a driving force of ASEAN’s economic prosperity. However, this increased economic interdependence creates challenges for both China and ASEAN: on the one hand, China seeks to make the transition from a high-income country to sustainable economic development in the ASEAN region, and on the other hand, ASEAN has concerns about excessive economic dependence on China. This situation requires a balance to be struck to avoid repeating the historical patterns seen in Japan in the 1960s and 1980s. This article examines the investment, trade and geopolitical relations between China and ASEAN in a historical retrospective of 2010-2022, assesses their economic dependence and the mechanisms of political-economic relations, identifies the factors that caused China’s rapid economic breakthrough, and outlines directions for overcoming the most modern challenges that have place in the context of this relationship through formulation of suggested frameworks. The article considers 2 research questions, for the solution of which the G/T (Grounded Theory) approach was used and a qualitative analysis of the 12 most relevant sources was carried out (limitation of their number – according to the concept of theoretical saturation), selected primarily through online databases, websites, international organizations’ data, analytical reviews, and scientific papers. RQ1: Identify the root causes of the problems faced by ASEAN middle-income countries in their engagement with China. The article identifies the following 3 main reasons through the empirical review analysis: 1) dependence of middle-income ASEAN countries on financial assistance, especially from China; 2) a noticeable decrease in unity in the ASEAN region; 3) China’s lack of recommendations on the advisory policy of economic development in the ASEAN countries. RQ2: development of recommendations for middle-income ASEAN countries to increase their ability to pave independent paths to sustainable economic development and reduce their economic dependence on China, taking into account the review of the balance of power in political relations with the United States and China. Using the qualitative analysis tool ATLAS.ti (version 24) for the G/T approach, it was concluded that to overcome the syndromes of lower-middle-income trap (LMIT) and higher-middle-income trap (HMIT), ASEAN economies should implement the following spontaneous strategies: infrastructure development, improvement of basic education and promotion of science and technology. In addition, it is important to raise awareness of political tensions between China and the US, apply the techniques of thoughtful diplomacy, fine-tuned policy formulation, and shared vision to establish a diplomatic balance between China, the US, and Japan in the context of geopolitical risk management.
Title: China-ASEAN Economic Ties: Balancing Growth amid Middle-Income Challenges and Opportunities
Description:
The introduction of a free trade area between the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and China (ACFTA) in 2012 brought China to a leading economic position in Southeast Asia (this was manifested in a significant, almost 2.
2-fold, increase in the volume of trade) and turned it into a driving force of ASEAN’s economic prosperity.
However, this increased economic interdependence creates challenges for both China and ASEAN: on the one hand, China seeks to make the transition from a high-income country to sustainable economic development in the ASEAN region, and on the other hand, ASEAN has concerns about excessive economic dependence on China.
This situation requires a balance to be struck to avoid repeating the historical patterns seen in Japan in the 1960s and 1980s.
This article examines the investment, trade and geopolitical relations between China and ASEAN in a historical retrospective of 2010-2022, assesses their economic dependence and the mechanisms of political-economic relations, identifies the factors that caused China’s rapid economic breakthrough, and outlines directions for overcoming the most modern challenges that have place in the context of this relationship through formulation of suggested frameworks.
The article considers 2 research questions, for the solution of which the G/T (Grounded Theory) approach was used and a qualitative analysis of the 12 most relevant sources was carried out (limitation of their number – according to the concept of theoretical saturation), selected primarily through online databases, websites, international organizations’ data, analytical reviews, and scientific papers.
RQ1: Identify the root causes of the problems faced by ASEAN middle-income countries in their engagement with China.
The article identifies the following 3 main reasons through the empirical review analysis: 1) dependence of middle-income ASEAN countries on financial assistance, especially from China; 2) a noticeable decrease in unity in the ASEAN region; 3) China’s lack of recommendations on the advisory policy of economic development in the ASEAN countries.
RQ2: development of recommendations for middle-income ASEAN countries to increase their ability to pave independent paths to sustainable economic development and reduce their economic dependence on China, taking into account the review of the balance of power in political relations with the United States and China.
Using the qualitative analysis tool ATLAS.
ti (version 24) for the G/T approach, it was concluded that to overcome the syndromes of lower-middle-income trap (LMIT) and higher-middle-income trap (HMIT), ASEAN economies should implement the following spontaneous strategies: infrastructure development, improvement of basic education and promotion of science and technology.
In addition, it is important to raise awareness of political tensions between China and the US, apply the techniques of thoughtful diplomacy, fine-tuned policy formulation, and shared vision to establish a diplomatic balance between China, the US, and Japan in the context of geopolitical risk management.
Related Results
Competition among China and ASEAN-5 in the US Market: A New Extension to Shift-Share Analysis
Competition among China and ASEAN-5 in the US Market: A New Extension to Shift-Share Analysis
The United States has a robust trade and investment relationship with China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). ASEAN is collectively the fourth-largest trading...
ASEAN WAY DALAM PERPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL
ASEAN WAY DALAM PERPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL
<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>ASEAN is not free from conflict among its members. For the example is...
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
Ekonomika bosanskih velikaša u 14. i 15. stoljeću
The role and significance of the Bosnian nobility in the historical currents of medieval Bosnia can be reliably traced in the 14th and 15th centuries when various socio-political f...
Russia-ASEAN Summit 2016: Improvement For The Better Strategic Partnership
Russia-ASEAN Summit 2016: Improvement For The Better Strategic Partnership
<p align="center"><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>This article tries to elaborate the impact for the cooperation between ASEAN-Russia in economic and ...
Interdependence of income between China and ASEAN‐5 countries
Interdependence of income between China and ASEAN‐5 countries
PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to empirically examine the interdependence of income between China and ASEAN‐5 countries by using the real gross domestic product (GDP). Besides ...
The Asean Charter: An Analysis
The Asean Charter: An Analysis
The adoption of the ASEAN Charter in 2007 was believed to have transformed ASEAN to become a more institutional organisation with a profound framework and inclusive principles that...
The Optimal Public Expenditure in Developing Countries
The Optimal Public Expenditure in Developing Countries
Many researchers believe that government expenditures promote economic growth at the first development stage. However, as public expenditure becomes too large, countries will suffe...
Determinants of Import in ASEAN Economic Community
Determinants of Import in ASEAN Economic Community
Introduction: Imports are an important component of economic development in developing countries, including in the ASEAN Economic Community.
Purpose: The aims of this study to an...


