Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Evolution of China’s Codification of Private International Law and Its Latest Development: Comments on China’s New PIL‑Act
View through CrossRef
Prior to the 20th century, the codification of private international law in China progressed in very slow pace, even though the earliest conflict rule already emerged in the Tang Code of 651. The promulgating of the Statute on the Application of Law on August 5, 1918 marked the birth of China’s modern private international law. Since the reform and open‑door policy was initiated in 1978, the codification of private international law in China has been entering into a stage of rapid and great improvement. A series of choice‑of‑law rules have been laid down in some domestic legislations, such as the General Principles of the Civil Law of 1986, the Maritime Act of 1992, the Civil Aviation Act of 1995, etc., and a lot of related judicial interpretations. However, the non‑systematic, incomplete, lacking conformity and unscientific provisions in the existing legislations cannot meet the practical needs. With the unremitting efforts of Chinese legislature and scholars of private international law over 20 years, the Act of the PRC on the Application of Laws in Foreign‑Related Civil Relations (PIL‑Act) was adopted on October 28, 2010. This Act contains 8 chapters and 52 articles, and reflects, both in style and in specific rules, many outstanding features, e.g. the expansion of the scope of party autonomy, habitual residence used as main connecting point in determining lex personalis, increased flexibility in application of laws. Meanwhile, there are some shortcomings in the PIL‑Act which should be improved through the judicial interpretations and subsequent legislative amendments in the future.
University of Silesia in Katowice
Title: The Evolution of China’s Codification of Private International Law and Its Latest Development: Comments on China’s New PIL‑Act
Description:
Prior to the 20th century, the codification of private international law in China progressed in very slow pace, even though the earliest conflict rule already emerged in the Tang Code of 651.
The promulgating of the Statute on the Application of Law on August 5, 1918 marked the birth of China’s modern private international law.
Since the reform and open‑door policy was initiated in 1978, the codification of private international law in China has been entering into a stage of rapid and great improvement.
A series of choice‑of‑law rules have been laid down in some domestic legislations, such as the General Principles of the Civil Law of 1986, the Maritime Act of 1992, the Civil Aviation Act of 1995, etc.
, and a lot of related judicial interpretations.
However, the non‑systematic, incomplete, lacking conformity and unscientific provisions in the existing legislations cannot meet the practical needs.
With the unremitting efforts of Chinese legislature and scholars of private international law over 20 years, the Act of the PRC on the Application of Laws in Foreign‑Related Civil Relations (PIL‑Act) was adopted on October 28, 2010.
This Act contains 8 chapters and 52 articles, and reflects, both in style and in specific rules, many outstanding features, e.
g.
the expansion of the scope of party autonomy, habitual residence used as main connecting point in determining lex personalis, increased flexibility in application of laws.
Meanwhile, there are some shortcomings in the PIL‑Act which should be improved through the judicial interpretations and subsequent legislative amendments in the future.
Related Results
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
An International Rule of Law
An International Rule of Law
The “international rule of law” is an elusive concept. Under this heading, mainly two variations are being discussed: The international rule of law “proper” and an “internationaliz...
Systematic hierarchical nature of sources of international criminal law: methodological aspects
Systematic hierarchical nature of sources of international criminal law: methodological aspects
The article considers the sources of international criminal law and notes that the system of sources of this branch is based on the principles of building a system of sources of in...
International Development Law
International Development Law
The field of law and development examines the role of law, legal institutions, and legal systems in economic, social, and political development. As a comparatively recent field eme...
INTERPRETATION OF THE SUBJECT OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN RUSSIAN DOCTRINE
INTERPRETATION OF THE SUBJECT OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN RUSSIAN DOCTRINE
Although the term "private international law" was introduced into the legal space back in the 19th century, there is no consolidated scientific definition of this legal entity in R...
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
531Human rights — Rights of women in Northern Ireland — Pregnant women and girls — Autonomy and bodily integrity — Right to respect for private and family life — Rights of persons ...

