Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Critical Areas to be Aware of for Efficient Floater Operations throughout the Lifecycle of the Asset
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This paper investigates the critical areas at every stage in the lifecycle of the floater that may have been overlooked by classification bodies as well as owners and operators. These areas result in compromise of safety, integrity and operational capability leading to direct costs and opportunity loss costs, from cost for revenue deferment, repairs, third party engagement and risking the reputation and integrity of the COMPANY. The findings reveal the primary cause of breach in critical areas is the lack of a check and balance mechanism that should be imposed by owners and operators of the floaters to Classification deliverables instead of completely depending on Classification Society. Certain optional certification by Classification Society should be made mandatory to avoid such failures.
Based on research and analysis of past floaters’ failures, a set of floaters’ integrity and assurance guideline should be developed and adopted by owners and operators to ensure safety, integrity and operational capability is always maintained and continuously monitored throughout the lifecycle of the Asset. Investigation on a number of case studies was conducted by collecting various data at all phases of the project (i.e. development, front end engineering, detail engineering, construction, transport and installation, hook up and commissioning, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning and demobilization & preservation).
This paper emphasizes the need for Classification Society, owners and operators to conduct mandatory internal reviews, as a form of check and balance to avoid instances of overlooked critical areas. Ensure cohesive decision making by classification society, owners and operators of floaters to circumvent instances of overlooking the identified critical areas resulting in hazardous work environment and revenue deferment that have caused operators to be accountable and owners to be responsible. The Floaters’ Integrity and Assurance Guideline should provide an accountable process for all phases of the project throughout the life cycle of the asset.
Title: Critical Areas to be Aware of for Efficient Floater Operations throughout the Lifecycle of the Asset
Description:
Abstract
This paper investigates the critical areas at every stage in the lifecycle of the floater that may have been overlooked by classification bodies as well as owners and operators.
These areas result in compromise of safety, integrity and operational capability leading to direct costs and opportunity loss costs, from cost for revenue deferment, repairs, third party engagement and risking the reputation and integrity of the COMPANY.
The findings reveal the primary cause of breach in critical areas is the lack of a check and balance mechanism that should be imposed by owners and operators of the floaters to Classification deliverables instead of completely depending on Classification Society.
Certain optional certification by Classification Society should be made mandatory to avoid such failures.
Based on research and analysis of past floaters’ failures, a set of floaters’ integrity and assurance guideline should be developed and adopted by owners and operators to ensure safety, integrity and operational capability is always maintained and continuously monitored throughout the lifecycle of the Asset.
Investigation on a number of case studies was conducted by collecting various data at all phases of the project (i.
e.
development, front end engineering, detail engineering, construction, transport and installation, hook up and commissioning, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning and demobilization & preservation).
This paper emphasizes the need for Classification Society, owners and operators to conduct mandatory internal reviews, as a form of check and balance to avoid instances of overlooked critical areas.
Ensure cohesive decision making by classification society, owners and operators of floaters to circumvent instances of overlooking the identified critical areas resulting in hazardous work environment and revenue deferment that have caused operators to be accountable and owners to be responsible.
The Floaters’ Integrity and Assurance Guideline should provide an accountable process for all phases of the project throughout the life cycle of the asset.
Related Results
Investigations on gap resonance between two non-identical floaters with effects of floater heave motion
Investigations on gap resonance between two non-identical floaters with effects of floater heave motion
In this article, a two-dimensional viscous-flow wave flume is established using the open-source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software OpenFOAM to investigate gap resonance be...
DAR, ROA dan TATO dalam memengaruhi Price Earning Ratio
DAR, ROA dan TATO dalam memengaruhi Price Earning Ratio
ABSTRAKTujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis pengaruh debt to asset ratio, return on asset dantotal asset turn over terhadap price earning ratio. Diperoleh 6 sampel perusahaan ...
Optimizing Asset Replacement Decisions Through Integrated 360° Insights
Optimizing Asset Replacement Decisions Through Integrated 360° Insights
Abstract
Objectives/Scope
Upper Zakum field is a significant offshore site where ADNOC Offshore invests heavily to bringi...
Towards the Synthesis of Product Knowledge Across the Lifecycle
Towards the Synthesis of Product Knowledge Across the Lifecycle
Product lifecycle management is an important aspect of today’s industry, as it serves to facilitate information exchange and management between most, if not all, stages of a produc...
A Two-Dimensional Approximation of a Floating Fish Farm in Waves and Current With the Effect of Snap Loads
A Two-Dimensional Approximation of a Floating Fish Farm in Waves and Current With the Effect of Snap Loads
Wave and current loads on the floater, netting and sinker tube of a floating fish farm are discussed. High flexibility of netting, floating collar and sinker tube and their structu...
Due Diligence and Valuation of Unconventional Oil & Gas Assets for Acquisition Bidding
Due Diligence and Valuation of Unconventional Oil & Gas Assets for Acquisition Bidding
Abstract
Acquisitions & Divestitures ("A&D") professionals routinely adjust the valuation parameters, on the basis of asset type being evaluated, to determin...
The Intention of Bridge Asset Management Implementation in Indonesia
The Intention of Bridge Asset Management Implementation in Indonesia
The need for effective bridge asset management in Indonesia has become crucial. Currently, the number of bridge assets in Indonesia is continuously increasing, parallel to the risi...
The Intention of Bridge Asset Management Implementation in Indonesia
The Intention of Bridge Asset Management Implementation in Indonesia
The need for effective bridge asset management in Indonesia has become crucial. Currently, the number of bridge assets in Indonesia is continuously increasing, parallel to the risi...

