Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Design thinking for innovation in sustainable built environments: a systematic literature review
View through CrossRef
PurposeThis systematic literature review investigates the contribution of design thinking (DT) as a process and tool to drive innovation in a sustainable built environment (SBE) and develops a new model for sustainability research integrating DT and future thinking approaches toward achieving a unified DT and foresight notion for future research and applications.Design/methodology/approachThis review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Open-access English articles published between 2000 and 2022 identified using the EBSCOhost, Emerald Insight, DOJA, JSTOR, Scopus and Taylor and Francis database searches were reviewed. The review framework deploys a previously proposed modified Ansoff matrix with an integrated innovation matrix to identify and analyze the challenges and opportunities for innovation growth in SBE. Additionally, a citation analysis was conducted to explore the impact of DT for innovation in SBE, and a proposed framework based on design by drawing on foresight theory was developed.FindingsResearch on DT for innovation in SBE faces the challenge of unanticipated impacts. According to the average number of citations per document, innovation associated with new solutions within a new context seems to become highly influential. Additionally, research gaps exist in the integration of foresight and DT into sustainability research to identify new contexts and solutions to SBE. A model of foresight design thinking (FDT) is proposed to guide future research and support the practical application of DT in sustainability.Research limitations/implicationsThis analysis was limited by the selection criteria as only certain keywords were used and English-only articles were selected. Future research should consider the use of DT for innovation in SBE using various important keywords, which would improve research findings and expand the contribution of DT to SBE.Practical implicationsThe FDT model offers a new holistic framework for the iterative process of reframing and reperception, focusing on divergent and convergent thinking with the goal of contributing to SBE practices.Social implicationsThe integrated framework of DT and foresight can contribute to the study and development of sustainable innovation and a strategic shift toward a sustainable society.Originality/valueThe integration of DT, foresight and sustainability can broaden the horizons of sustainability research by systematically addressing future challenges related to SBE, which can be translated into feasible and innovative solutions. Thus, the FDT model complements the application of DT in sustainable innovation in this research field.
Title: Design thinking for innovation in sustainable built environments: a systematic literature review
Description:
PurposeThis systematic literature review investigates the contribution of design thinking (DT) as a process and tool to drive innovation in a sustainable built environment (SBE) and develops a new model for sustainability research integrating DT and future thinking approaches toward achieving a unified DT and foresight notion for future research and applications.
Design/methodology/approachThis review was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.
Open-access English articles published between 2000 and 2022 identified using the EBSCOhost, Emerald Insight, DOJA, JSTOR, Scopus and Taylor and Francis database searches were reviewed.
The review framework deploys a previously proposed modified Ansoff matrix with an integrated innovation matrix to identify and analyze the challenges and opportunities for innovation growth in SBE.
Additionally, a citation analysis was conducted to explore the impact of DT for innovation in SBE, and a proposed framework based on design by drawing on foresight theory was developed.
FindingsResearch on DT for innovation in SBE faces the challenge of unanticipated impacts.
According to the average number of citations per document, innovation associated with new solutions within a new context seems to become highly influential.
Additionally, research gaps exist in the integration of foresight and DT into sustainability research to identify new contexts and solutions to SBE.
A model of foresight design thinking (FDT) is proposed to guide future research and support the practical application of DT in sustainability.
Research limitations/implicationsThis analysis was limited by the selection criteria as only certain keywords were used and English-only articles were selected.
Future research should consider the use of DT for innovation in SBE using various important keywords, which would improve research findings and expand the contribution of DT to SBE.
Practical implicationsThe FDT model offers a new holistic framework for the iterative process of reframing and reperception, focusing on divergent and convergent thinking with the goal of contributing to SBE practices.
Social implicationsThe integrated framework of DT and foresight can contribute to the study and development of sustainable innovation and a strategic shift toward a sustainable society.
Originality/valueThe integration of DT, foresight and sustainability can broaden the horizons of sustainability research by systematically addressing future challenges related to SBE, which can be translated into feasible and innovative solutions.
Thus, the FDT model complements the application of DT in sustainable innovation in this research field.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Social innovation : understanding selected Durban-based interior designers' perceptions of socially responsible interior design
Social innovation : understanding selected Durban-based interior designers' perceptions of socially responsible interior design
In a world with pressing social issues that require the collaboration of multiple stakeholders to solve them, this research sought to find out through the views of interior design ...
Performative Microforests
Performative Microforests
The design of office buildings can substantially improve the building, social, and ecological performance of office building projects. However, existing research on improving the p...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Design Thinking vs design thinking
Design Thinking vs design thinking
<p><b>This research offers a comparison of the different uses of design thinking and investigates how design thinking is used within business models and compares this t...
Innovation, Innovation Strategy, and Strategic Innovation
Innovation, Innovation Strategy, and Strategic Innovation
Abstract
Purpose
The purposes of this chapter are to propose definitions of innovation, product innovation, business mode...

