Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Gas relative permeability and its modeling in tight and ultra-tight porous rocks
View through CrossRef
Abstract Gas relative permeability, krg, is a key parameter to determine
gas production in unconventional reservoirs. Several theoretical
approaches were proposed to study gas relative permeability in tight and
ultra-tight porous rocks. Some models are based on a “bundle of
capillary tubes” concept. Some others were developed based upon a
combination of universal scaling laws from percolation theory and the
effective-medium approximation (EMA). Although applications from the EMA
have been successfully used to estimate single-phase permeability in
permeable media (Ghanbarian et al., 2017; Ghanbarian and Javadpour,
2017), non-universal scaling from the EMA has never been invoked to
model gas relative permeability in tight and/or ultra-tight porous
rocks. In this study, it was assumed that pore-throat sizes follow the
log-normal distribution. It was further assumed that gas transport in
shales is mainly controlled by molecular and hydraulic flow, two
mechanisms contributing in parallel. Using the EMA, effective
pore-throat radii, effective conductances, and gas relative
permeabilities were determined at various gas saturations. Comparison
with three-dimensional pore-network simulations showed that the proposed
krg model estimated gas relative permeability accurately. We also
compared our model with experimental data reported in Yassin et al.
(2016) including three Montney tight gas siltstone samples from the
Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Results showed that our model
estimated krg reasonably well, although it slightly overestimated krg.
This might be because the fitted log-normal probability density function
underestimated the probability of small pore-throat sizes. References
Ghanbarian, B., & Javadpour, F. (2017). Upscaling pore
pressure‐dependent gas permeability in shales. Journal of Geophysical
Research: Solid Earth, 122(4), 2541-2552. Ghanbarian, B., Torres-Verdin,
C., Lake, L. W., & Marder, M. P. (2017). Upscaling gas permeability in
tight-gas sandstones. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. New Orleans LA.
Yassin, M. R., Dehghanpour, H., Wood, J., & Lan, Q. (2016). A theory
for relative permeability of unconventional rocks with dual-wettability
pore network. SPE Journal, 21(06), 1970-1980.
Title: Gas relative permeability and its modeling in tight and ultra-tight porous rocks
Description:
Abstract Gas relative permeability, krg, is a key parameter to determine
gas production in unconventional reservoirs.
Several theoretical
approaches were proposed to study gas relative permeability in tight and
ultra-tight porous rocks.
Some models are based on a “bundle of
capillary tubes” concept.
Some others were developed based upon a
combination of universal scaling laws from percolation theory and the
effective-medium approximation (EMA).
Although applications from the EMA
have been successfully used to estimate single-phase permeability in
permeable media (Ghanbarian et al.
, 2017; Ghanbarian and Javadpour,
2017), non-universal scaling from the EMA has never been invoked to
model gas relative permeability in tight and/or ultra-tight porous
rocks.
In this study, it was assumed that pore-throat sizes follow the
log-normal distribution.
It was further assumed that gas transport in
shales is mainly controlled by molecular and hydraulic flow, two
mechanisms contributing in parallel.
Using the EMA, effective
pore-throat radii, effective conductances, and gas relative
permeabilities were determined at various gas saturations.
Comparison
with three-dimensional pore-network simulations showed that the proposed
krg model estimated gas relative permeability accurately.
We also
compared our model with experimental data reported in Yassin et al.
(2016) including three Montney tight gas siltstone samples from the
Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin.
Results showed that our model
estimated krg reasonably well, although it slightly overestimated krg.
This might be because the fitted log-normal probability density function
underestimated the probability of small pore-throat sizes.
References
Ghanbarian, B.
, & Javadpour, F.
(2017).
Upscaling pore
pressure‐dependent gas permeability in shales.
Journal of Geophysical
Research: Solid Earth, 122(4), 2541-2552.
Ghanbarian, B.
, Torres-Verdin,
C.
, Lake, L.
W.
, & Marder, M.
P.
(2017).
Upscaling gas permeability in
tight-gas sandstones.
AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.
New Orleans LA.
Yassin, M.
R.
, Dehghanpour, H.
, Wood, J.
, & Lan, Q.
(2016).
A theory
for relative permeability of unconventional rocks with dual-wettability
pore network.
SPE Journal, 21(06), 1970-1980.
Related Results
Permeability Prediction for Carbonates: Still a Challenge?
Permeability Prediction for Carbonates: Still a Challenge?
Abstract
Permeability estimation for a well and mapping it for a field are extremely critical and difficult tasks in hydrocarbon exploration and production. Diffe...
Study on Physical Simulation Experimental Technology of Ultra-low Permeability Large-scale Outcrop Model
Study on Physical Simulation Experimental Technology of Ultra-low Permeability Large-scale Outcrop Model
Abstract
Ultra-low permeability reserves have accounted for a very large proportion of China's proven reserves and undeveloped reserves at present, so it is very ...
Comparative Study on Stress-dependent Permeability of Ultra-low Permeability Sandstone Rock Using Different Types of Fluid Media
Comparative Study on Stress-dependent Permeability of Ultra-low Permeability Sandstone Rock Using Different Types of Fluid Media
Abstract
During the production lifecycle of a reservoir, rock permeability may change due to the increase of the effective stress which could significantly affect...
Developing a Proficient Relative Permeability Resource From Historical Data
Developing a Proficient Relative Permeability Resource From Historical Data
Abstract
Having reliable and readily accessible relative permeability information is a problem for many reservoir engineers. In the absence of laboratory measured...
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract
Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...
Effect of Reservoir Temperature and Pressure on Relative Permeability
Effect of Reservoir Temperature and Pressure on Relative Permeability
Abstract
Relative permeability is a critical parameter for evaluation of gas reservoir performances. Earlier works have indicated that relative permeabilities are ma...
Classification and Evaluation of Ultra-Low Permeability Reservoirs in the Changqing Oilfield
Classification and Evaluation of Ultra-Low Permeability Reservoirs in the Changqing Oilfield
Abstract
With the rapid development of the world economy, the exploration and development of unconventional oil and gas resources have become a new hot spot. As a...
An Investigation of Multicomponent Gas Flow in Porous Media
An Investigation of Multicomponent Gas Flow in Porous Media
Abstract
The complex gas dynamics in tight and shale reservoirs have become an important research topic in the oil and gas industry. This study proposes a steady-sta...

